Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Latter-day Saint
A simple argument for the historicity of Jesus as a miracle-worker

A simple argument for the historicity of Jesus as a miracle-worker

Last updated on: April 27, 2020 at 4:53 pm by Dan Peterson

A simple argument for the historicity of Jesus as a miracle-worker 2020-04-27T16:53:52-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The cover of “In God’s Image and Likeness 2,” which is available for purchase.

The article below went up on the website of the Interpreter Foundation earlier today:

In God’s Image and Likeness 2: Enoch, Noah, and the Tower of Babel: Genesis 11: The Tower of Babel

Part of our book chapter reprint series, this article originally appeared in In God’s Image and Likeness 2: Enoch, Noah, and the Tower of Babel (2014) by Jeffrey M. Bradshaw and David J. Larsen.

Abstract: This chapter on the Tower of Babel employs language artfully to express and undermine human pretensions to power. In exploring the Mesopotamian background of the story and the counterpoint between the tower and the temple, we see its relevance for the world today. The section describing the confounding of language takes both the language of scripture and the scholarship of modern linguistics seriously. The chapter ends with a bridge to what comes next: the story of Abraham.

***

A couple of days ago, I was listening to a lecture by the eminent British New Testament scholar N. T. Wright, for whom I have enormous respect. Along the way, he briefly made an argument about Jesus as a worker of miracles that I myself should have thought of before, but had not. (He credited it to the late Anglo-American theologian and philosopher Colin Brown.) The argument is very simple, and goes as follows:

Step 1: The New Testament’s synoptic gospels all report that the critics of Jesus accused him of working miracles by demonic power:

“But the Pharisees said, He casteth out devils through the prince of the devils.” (Matthew 9:34)

“But when the Pharisees heard it, they said, This fellow doth not cast out devils, but by Beelzebub the prince of the devils.” (Matthew 12:24)

“And the scribes which came down from Jerusalem said, He hath Beelzebub, and by the prince of the devils casteth he out devils.” (Mark 3:22)

“But some of them said, He casteth out devils through Beelzebub the chief of the devils.” (Luke 11:15)

Step 2: It is extremely unlikely that early Christians would have invented such a grave allegation against their revered Messiah. (Jews of the first and second centuries took demons seriously.)

Step 3: It seems probable, therefore, that the allegation of working miracles through the power of the devil must really have been leveled against Jesus.

Step 4: But what occasion would his critics have had to level such an allegation against him if he had not at least seemed to be performing miracles?

Step 5: Accordingly, it seems likely that the historical Jesus really did perform seeming miracles. (Which is to say that he wasn’t simply a wise teacher, charismatic rabbi, or homespun philosopher to whom miracles were subsequently attributed in a process of gradual mythologizing.)

Previous Post

April 26, 2020

"He found himself standing next to his own body."

Next Post

April 27, 2020 "Abductive Reasoning"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which disciple was known as "the beloved"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

John Andrew Peter Matthew