Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Latter-day Saint
In the wake of the Senate vote on witnesses (II)

In the wake of the Senate vote on witnesses (II)

Last updated on: February 1, 2020 at 11:47 pm by Dan Peterson

In the wake of the Senate vote on witnesses (II) 2020-02-01T23:47:52-07:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The United States Capitol at Washington DC (Wikimedia Commons public domain photo)

In a previous post, I wrote briefly about William F. Buckley’s role in putting together a unified and rather successful American conservative movement out of very disparate elements. He was certainly not the only person involved — Robert Taft, Barry Goldwater, Ronald Reagan, and others played vital parts — but he illustrates the important service that a public intellectual can play. (The great Milton Friedman also played a crucial part.)

Donald Trump has done a very great deal to destroy that coalition. Or, perhaps better, he has contributed mightily to exposing and exacerbating the fissures within it.

Historically, Mr. Trump has not been a pillar of the Republican Party. Not remotely. He registered as a Republican in 1987. In 1999, he changed his affiliation to the Independence Party of New York. In August 2001, he became a Democrat. In September 2009, he registered again as a Republican. In December 2011, he became an independent. In April 2012, he registered again as a Republican. In a July 2015 interview, he explained that he has a broad range of political positions and said that “I identify with some things as a Democrat.”

He has never been involved with the American conservative movement, neither (to point out the obvious) as one of its intellectual leaders nor as a leader or foot soldier. Curiously, though, certain factions within what I once thought was the conservative movement now appear to see absolute loyalty to the person of Mr. Donald J. Trump as the sine qua non, the one indispensable requirement, in order to be a True Conservative.

“Falwell, Jeffress Ask Trump If They Can Sit At His Right And Left Hands When He Goes Into Glory”

If you’ve been following the impeachment news out of Washington DC — I’ve been trying not to do so, but it’s almost inescapable — you’ll know that Senator Mitt Romney of Utah was one of two Senate Republicans to vote in favor of calling witnesses in the Senate portion of the process:

“Senate rejects Dems’ and Romney’s demands to have Bolton testify at trial: Senate schedules final vote on verdict for Wednesday”

I myself fully expect, and have always expected, that the Senate will acquit Mr. Trump. And I’m not sure — although I heartily wish that he would just go away, and although I believe that he very much deserves censure — that he should be convicted. On the matter of Senate witnesses, I believe that good and reasonable people can differ. So does Senator Mike Lee of Utah, who voted against calling them, while Senator Romney voted for calling them. In a tweet following the vote, Senator Lee praised Senator Romney for taking a stand on the question of witnesses, even though it differed from his own:

“We have disagreed about a lot in this trial. But he has my respect for the thoughtfulness, integrity, and guts he has shown throughout this process. Utah and the Senate are lucky to have him.”

But Senator Romney is now being punished for his stance:

“CPAC uninvites Mitt Romney after his impeachment witness vote”

“Twitter Critics Mock CPAC For ‘Formally Not Inviting’ Mitt Romney After Witness Vote: One suggests the Conservative Political Action Conference might want to fill his imagined empty seat with a white supremacist.”

In this context, I think of the way that John Bolton has recently been criticized: Mr. Bolton has long been a respected figure on the political right. No more, though:

“Trump rages at Bolton, says former adviser would have caused ‘World War Six’: The president’s latest attack on his ex-national security adviser comes as the Senate is weighing calling him as a witness.”

“Fox News Suddenly Has It Out for John Bolton, Ex-Fox Contributor: With Bolton’s new book threatening the president’s streamlined impeachment acquittal, Sean Hannity and Lou Dobbs—Bolton’s onetime coworkers—are on the attack.”

“Rand Paul calls on President Trump to remove John Bolton’s security clearance”

While Trump-loyalists like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity ride high, long-time conservative thought-leaders like William Kristol, George Will, and the late Charles Krauthammer are vilified because of their lack of fealty to the Dear Leader:

“Trump: George Will Is an ‘Overrated Fool’”

“Donald Trump unloads on ‘loser’ Bill Kristol amid reports of possible third-party candidacy”

“Bill Kristol on ‘renegade Jew’ label: ‘That’s something new'”

“Charles Krauthammer: The Intellectual Conservative Who Loved Bibi, but Loathed Trump: Krauthammer wrote often about how he saw Israel as a beacon of freedom and U.S. President Donald Trump as a threat to democracy”

“Donald Trump Goes After ‘Overrated Clown’ Charles Krauthammer”

Beyond the obvious fact that Donald Trump is an abusive person who values loyalty to himself higher than almost anything else, I can’t help but see this as reflecting a split between populism and real, principled conservatism. It may not be coincidental — and I know that this will sound damnably elitist when I say it — that, while Kristol, Krauthammer, and Will have Ivy League doctorates (from Harvard, Harvard, and Princeton, respectively), neither Hannity nor Limbaugh (both of whom are mass media performing stars, in somewhat the same way that Mr. Trump was) has a college degree.

But the class and educational differences are of, at most, tertiary significance to me. I care very, very much, however, about the fact that major intellectual leaders of the conservative movement, people who have been dedicated advocates and explicators of conservative thought over decades, are being demonized and marginalized in the service of a morally challenged man whose commitments to constitutionalism, limited government, free markets, and the rule of law are, if they’re genuine at all, of only recent vintage.

“Trump: “I Could Stand In the Middle Of Fifth Avenue And Shoot Somebody And I Wouldn’t Lose Any Voters””

“Poll: 62% of Trump supporters say nothing he could do would change opinion”

This reminds me all too much of the Nazi Führerprinzip. In religious terms, it seems to me flatly idolatrous. It is servile. It is fundamentally unconservative and radically un-American, unworthy of the free citizens of a republic.

To be continued.

Previous Post

February 1, 2020

In the wake of the Senate vote on witnesses (I)

Next Post

February 1, 2020 Brigham Young on the life to come

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: King Josiah found the Book of the Law hidden in the temple during repairs.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE