Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Latter-day Saint
Chick-fil-A and the Mental Health of Certain Academics and Administrators at the University of Kansas

Chick-fil-A and the Mental Health of Certain Academics and Administrators at the University of Kansas

Last updated on: September 2, 2019 at 10:57 pm by Dan Peterson

Chick-fil-A and the Mental Health of Certain Academics and Administrators at the University of Kansas 2019-09-02T22:57:11-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The three principal government slogans of Oceania in George Orwell’s dystopian novel “1984”
(Wikimedia Commons public domain image)

“University of Kansas Faculty Protest Chick-fil-A on Campus in Fear of ‘Mental Well-being'”

“Kansas University faculty wants Chick-fil-A banned from campus for fears of ‘safety,’ ‘mental well being'”

Representing the university’s administration, the interim provost at the University of Kansas, Carl Lejuez, speaks grandly of “our commitment to affirm diversity and to be a welcoming and inclusive campus,” but it isn’t especially clear that the diversity, inclusivity, and friendly welcome to which he and his fellow administrators are committed includes a diversity of ideas. (Perhaps ideas aren’t very important to higher education officials these days.)

In order to combat “hatred and intolerance,” opponents of Chick-fil-A demand that the company be marginalized and ultimately barred from campus.

Why? The company culture reflects the beliefs of its late founder, S. Truett Cathy, who was a devout Southern Baptist Christian, in that it closes on Sundays as well as on Thanksgiving and Christmas day. Its current chief operating officer, Dan T. Cathy, has continued those policies and has publicly expressed his opposition to same-sex marriage. Moreover, the WinShape Foundation, which is Chick-fil-A’s charitable arm, has made donations to such groups as the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, the Family Research Council, and the Salvation Army, which oppose gay marriage and disapprove of sexual relations between people of the same sex.

Apparently, though, Chick-fil-A does not refuse to serve gay people. So far as I’m aware, no allegations to that effect have been made. Nor does Chick-fil-A refuse to hire gay people. I don’t believe that they’ve been accused of such a thing. They appear to be fully in compliance with the law.

The offence appears to consist in the fact that the Cathys have religious and political views — entirely legal religious and political views, well within their constitutional rights to express — of which certain elite and powerful groups fiercely disapprove.

Thus, the late Thomas Menino, who was mayor of Boston at the time, announced his intention to try to block Chick-fil-A from expanding into his city, as did also at least one Chicago alderman who apparently saw Chick-fil-A’s values as a serious threat to his otherwise idyllically peaceful city. New York’s mayor Bill de Blasio — did you know that he’s a Democratic presidential candidate? — called upon New Yorkers to boycott Chick-fil-A. And the Buffalo Niagara International Airport and the San Antonio International Airport have both banned Chick-fil-A from having franchises in their hallowed halls, expressly on the basis of disdain for the religious and political views of the company’s principal owners.

Fortunately, we in the United States have a Bill of Rights that consists of ten amendments to the Constitution, the very first of which begins as follows:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

The precedent set by that opening sentence has led to the (at least until recently) widely held principle that not even Boston and New York mayors, San Antonio city councils, or Chicago aldermen have the right to use the coercive power of the government to punish the lawful exercise of religious belief.

Canada’s legal and constitutional system differs, and here’s a story from our neighbor to the north:

“Canada: 26 organisations denied funding for being pro-life”

Previous Post

September 2, 2019

"One of the chief characteristics of Deity"

Next Post

September 3, 2019 Were there Near Eastern languages in ancient America?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Abraham asked to offer as a sacrifice?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Shem Jacob Isaac Ishmael