Gender Nineteen Eighty-Fouria

Last updated on: July 12, 2019 at 2:43 pm by Dan Peterson

Gender Nineteen Eighty-Fouria 2019-07-12T14:43:51-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Let’s make Orwell fiction again.
(Public domain mage from Wikimedia Commons)

I have to admit that I resonated with this story just a little bit because of my own quite unexpected 2012-2013 experience with nasty campus politics. But it raises far more important issues than that, and I hope very much that you will read it:

“Gender Dissenter Gets Fired: Dr. Allan Josephson discusses academic freedom, child welfare, gender ideology, and the price he has paid for his principles.”

We’re living through a distinctly weird time, and, in my judgment, a very dangerous and frightening one. (See “A Lawsuit to Protect Academic Freedom in a Surprising State.”) The thought police are out in force, and many ideas, especially but not only those connected with gender issues, have essentially been declared “crimethink,” to use an appropriately Orwellian term.

Some of it may seem ridiculous and perhaps a bit irritating, as illustrated by a recent article (“Let Us Have Our Boyhoods and Girlhoods”) by Michael Brendan Dougherty that begins with these words:

Writing in the New York Times, tech writer Farhad Manjoo says that we ought to eliminate “gendered” pronouns. Manjoo wants to eighty-six “he” and “she”; “him” and “her.” Our techie isn’t for some of the newly proposed pronouns like “ze,” because studies have shown people don’t know what or who ze is. Perhaps ze should be left to gender nonconforming people. That’s ze truth.

Manjoo’s truth is that he wants us to use “they” as a singular pronoun. “It’s flexible, inclusive, unobtrusive and obviates the risk of inadvertent misgendering.” Manjoo personally wants to be referred to as “they.”

Well, here goes.

Only two types of people object to Farhad’s proposal, they (Manjoo) writes. They (the types) are the grammarians and “the plainly intolerant.” They (Manjoo) has two children, a boy and a girl. They (Manjoo) says they (Manjoo) has been watching them (their’s children) grow up and adapt themselves (their’s children) to roles prescribed by their (all of the above) society. This horrifies them.

By “them” I mean them (Manjoo).

Okay, I can’t do this anymore.

One of the two principal purposes of Orwell’s Newspeak is to make unorthodox thoughts literally impossible. “Orthodoxy,” says the Newspeak lexicographer Syme in 1984, “means not thinking — not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness.”

Right now, most of us still laugh at nonsense like that espoused by Farhad Manjoo. “There are,” Orwell once quipped, “some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them.” But this sort of thing is beginning to have a measurable impact in the real world:

“The High School Fighting to Save Women’s Sports: As athletic conferences embrace radical new policies, female athletes lose opportunities to compete fairly.”

It’s an appropriate time, I think, to quote again a passage from the Anglo-French writer and historian Hilaire Belloc (1870-1953) that I’ve cited here at least once before. Belloc died nearly seven decades ago. What would he think were he to look in on us now?

The Barbarian hopes — and that is the mark of him — that he can have his cake and eat it too. He will consume what civilization has slowly produced after generations of selection and effort, but he will not be at pains to replace such goods, nor indeed has he a comprehension of the virtue that has brought them into being. Discipline seems to him irrational, on which account he is ever marvelling that civilization should have offended him with priests and soldiers. . . . In a word, the Barbarian is discoverable everywhere in this, that he cannot make: that he can befog and destroy but that he cannot sustain; and of every Barbarian in the decline or peril of every civilization exactly that has been true.

We sit by and watch the barbarian. We tolerate him in the long stretches of peace, we are not afraid. We are tickled by his irreverence; his comic inversion of our old certitudes and our fixed creed refreshes us; we laugh. But as we laugh we are watched by large and awful faces from beyond, and on these faces there are no smiles.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 12, 2019

Hugh Nibley and the Heartland

Next Post

July 12, 2019 I'm sincerely worried, and I hope that this will stop.

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "We ought to obey God rather than men"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Paul James Peter John