Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

danpeterson

William of Ockham and the Multiverse

Last updated on: April 22, 2019 at 8:20 pm   by Dan Peterson

William of Ockham and the Multiverse 2019-04-22T20:20:50-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

 

Nobody can copyright a galaxy

A very close 2005 NASA public domain look at the nucleus of the galaxy NGC 5033.

 

First, some practically-useful science stuff:

 

“Skipping breakfast tied to higher risk of heart-related death, study finds”

 

“You’re not getting enough sleep—and it’s killing you: A neuroscientist captivates the audience at TED 2019.”

 

***

 

This is entertaining:

 

“Why English Is One of the Weirdest Languages”

 

And, speaking of communication, here’s an item out of BYU:

 

“Study reveals birds’ surprising sound source: The best place for a bird’s voice box is low in the airway, researchers find”

 

***

 

I offer here two quotations from Alan Lightman, The Accidental Universe: The World You Thought You Knew.  Lightman, an American physicist and writer, has served on the faculties of both Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).   He is currently a “professor of the practice of the humanities” at MIT.  He doesn’t seem to be a fan of “intelligent design” or of the use of apparent cosmic fine-tuning in support of theistic belief:

 

Intelligent Design is an answer to fine-tuning that does not appeal to most scientists. The multiverse offers another explanation. 

If there are zillions of different universes with different properties—for example, some with nuclear forces much stronger than in our universe and some with nuclear forces much weaker—then some of those universes will allow the emergence of life and some will not. 

Some of those universes will be dead, lifeless hulks of matter and energy, and some will permit the emergence of cells, plants and animals, minds. 

From the huge range of possible universes predicted by the theories, the fraction of universes with life is undoubtedly small. But that doesn’t matter. 

We live in one of the universes that permits life because otherwise we wouldn’t be here to ponder the question.

 

Our universe is what it is simply because we are here. 

The situation can be likened to that of a group of intelligent fish who one day begin wondering why their world is completely filled with water. 

Many of the fish, the theorists, hope to prove that the cosmos necessarily has to be filled with water. For years, they put their minds to the task but can never quite seem to prove their assertion. 

Then a wizened group of fish postulates that maybe they are fooling themselves. Maybe, they suggest, there are many other worlds, some of them completely dry, some wet, and everything in between.

 

I can’t help but think, in this context, of the English Franciscan friar, scholastic philosopher, and theologian William of Ockham (ca. 1287-1347) and his famous “law of parsimony,” generally known as Occam’s razor or Ockham’s razor.  Boiled down to its essence, it holds that simpler solutions are more likely to be correct than complex ones, that one should, on balance, select the answer or explanation or hypothesis that requires the fewest assumptions.

 

Curiously, Ockham’s razor can’t be found in its familiar form in any of William’s writings.  But there are expressions of a similar sentiment.  For instance, in his theological treatise on the Sentences of Peter Lombard he writes Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate (“Plurality must never be posited without necessity”).

 

“Zillions” of universes seem pretty plural — to me, at least.

 

One famous later formulation of Ockham’s razor that doesn’t precisely occur in any of his preserved texts seems especially apropos here:

 

Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem

“Entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity.”

 

And, again, to posit the existence of “zillions” of universes in order to escape potential theistic implications of cosmic fine-tuning seems to me a pretty impressive example of multiplying entities.

 

 

Uncategorized

Previous Post



April 22, 2019

Some notes on Herzliya

Next Post



April 22, 2019 New Testament Notes 242-245


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian denomination is known for circuit riders and revival meetings in America?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Presbyterian Episcopalian Catholic Methodist

Related posts from Sic et Non

Family

Learning more about a region of which I've...

Sic et Non

Family

From Serbia's "White City," Belgrade

Sic et Non

Family

Accounts of Premortality?

Sic et Non

Family

King St. Stephen of Hungary

Sic et Non

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

Swimfan: Forgotten Aughts Pleasures

This is a recovery effort. In 2002, My Big Fat Greek Wedding...

Top Three Anti-Catholic Lies About Catholicism

  This is my initial transcript for the video, "THE 3 WORST...

Pope Leo Celebrates Mass for Nurses & Docs...

I don't have any idea how he did it, but Pope Leo...

The Sermon on the Mount, Part I: Matthew...

The Sermon on the Mount, Part I (Matthew 4:12-5:12) St. Matthew moves...

What's up from Crossway

What's up from Crossway: Reviewing some of their latest A few weeks...

Janie Learns the Way of the Cross: A...

Teaching children about Jesus' Passion can be challenging. Many parents and educators...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube