Some preliminary notes on fine-tuning and the “four fundamental forces”

Last updated on: April 18, 2019 at 12:30 am by Dan Peterson

Some preliminary notes on fine-tuning and the “four fundamental forces” 2019-04-18T00:30:45-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Not quite the way things really are (Wikimedia Commons)

I’m trying to get these things clear in my mind for a long-term project, so here is a first sketch. Comments and corrections welcome. This isn’t exactly my field of specialization:

The term Big Bang was coined by the great English astronomer and astrophysicist Sir Fred Hoyle. “These theories,” he said during a BBC radio broadcast in 1949, “were based on the hypothesis that all the matter in the universe was created in one big bang at a particular time in the remote past.”

It has been claimed that Hoyle meant Big Bang to be dismissive. He himself proposed and favored the “steady state” model, a cosmological theory that was still in vogue (at least popularly) when I was in high school but that has since fallen just about completely out of favor. However, Hoyle denied that he intended the term pejoratively. He simply wanted to emphasize the difference between the “steady state” theory and the concept of a “big bang.”

According to the Big Bang cosmological model, the universe has not always existed in its current state but, rather, began at a specific time in the finite past — currently estimated at — from a primordial state of inconceivable density and temperature.

Unsurprisingly, given its designation as a “Big Bang,” we tend to imagine this primeval event an explosion. And, in our experience, explosions are extremely chaotic phenomena. Explosions neither create order nor preserve it. Explosions destroy order.

Plainly, then, it’s severely mistaken to think of the Big Bang as an explosion, because out of it came astonishing order, complex and mathematically expressible natural laws, an organized cosmos rather than a disorganized chaos, a habitable universe, a home for intelligent life.

It might be more appropriate to think of the “Big Bang” as an “expansion event.” It manifested inconceivable energy, like an explosion, but, quite unlike an explosion, it did so in a manner that can be argued to have been fine-tuned, controlled, even directed.

Here are four examples of apparent “fine-tuning,” involving the four fundamental forces or fundamental interactions known to physics — called “fundamental” because they cannot be reduced to more basic interactions:

The Strong Nuclear Force: The strong nuclear force holds most ordinary matter together, forming quarks into hadron particles such as protons and neutrons, and binding neutrons and protons to create atomic nuclei. At a distance of 10−15 m (1 femtometer), the strong force is approximately 137 times as strong as electromagnetism, a million times as strong as the weak interaction, and 1038 times as strong as gravitation. If it were slightly more powerful, there would be no hydrogen, an essential element of life. If it were slightly weaker, hydrogen would be the sole element in the universe.
The Weak Nuclear Force: Also known as the “weak interaction” or “weak force,” the weak nuclear force is the mechanism of interaction between subatomic particles that is responsible for the radioactive decay of atoms. If it were slightly different, either there would be insufficient helium to generate heavy elements in stars, or else stars would burn out too quickly and, as a result, supernova explosions could not scatter heavy elements across the universe.
The Electromagnetic Force: The electromagnetic force, or Lorentz force, accounts for the interaction between both moving and stationary charged particles. It’s called the electromagnetic force because it includes both electric force and the magnetic force, which were formerly thought to be distinct; it turns out that magnetic forces and electric forces are actually the same fundamental force. If it were slightly stronger or weaker, atomic bonds could not form — which would mean that molecules could not form.
The Gravitational Constant: In Newtonian terms, the gravitational constant (G) is the proportionality constant connecting the gravitational force between two bodies with the product of their masses and the inverse square of the distance between them. If its value were slightly larger, stars would become too hot and would burn out too quickly. If it were smaller, stars would never burn at all and heavy elements would not be produced.

Uncategorized

big bang

electromagnetic force

fine-tuning

fundamental forces

gravitational constant

Previous Post

April 16, 2019

Where things stand regarding the "Witnesses" film project

Next Post

April 16, 2019 An Easter sermon from more than sixteen centuries ago

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who asked Jesus, "What is truth?"

Select your answer to see how you score.

Herod Pilate Nicodemus Caiaphas