Always Playing Defense?

Last updated on: April 8, 2019 at 11:40 am by Dan Peterson

Always Playing Defense? 2019-04-08T11:40:34-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

What a silly strategy! This fellow isn’t going to hit a home run while playing shortstop behind the pitcher. What on earth is he thinking?
(Wikimedia Commons public domain image)

I was amused a few weeks ago — perhaps bemused would be the more appropriate word — to read a pronouncement from a nonmember of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints about the gross weakness of Latter-day Saint apologetics.

He has, he says right off, never read much apologetic writing apart from C. S. Lewis and G. K. Chesterton.

I note, for the record, that neither C. S. Lewis nor G. K. Chesterton was a Latter-day Saint. So, if you take them out of consideration, what he’s saying is that he hasn’t read much Latter-day Saint apologetic work at all.

But he had just read the article by the late Davis Bitton that was recently republished in Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship — “I Don’t Have a Testimony of the History of the Church” — and he didn’t like it.

Unlike Lewis and Chesterton, he says, who offered affirmative reasons for their beliefs, Latter-day Saint apologists seem merely defensive.

This reminds me of the old witticism, “All Indians walk in single file lines. At least, the one I saw did.”

After all, it seems that he’s basing his judgment on a reading of a single essay by Davis Bitton. He himself freely volunteers that he’s read very little Latter-day Saint apologetic writing.

Davis Bitton’s essay is, admittedly, devoted to offering a defense. But to draw from that fact the sweeping conclusion that Latter-day Saint apologetic writing is wholly or even largely defensive is, quite obviously, to generalize from far too small a sample, and from one that is arguably quite unrepresentative.

It’s as if, based on watching only two minutes of the 2019 Super Bowl, someone were imagine himself an expert on football strategy. “I don’t watch much football, but I noticed that the New England Patriots played only defense, while the Los Angeles Rams were always — without exception! — on the offense. This was plainly an error on the part of the Patriots. Unless they change their game plan, they’re far less likely to score than the Rams are and they’re almost certainly going to lose. Plainly, they lack the confidence that the Rams have.”

Or imagine the same person who, based solely on his observation of the bottom half of the third inning of Game 3 in the 2018 World Series, concludes that the strategy of the Boston Red Sox (based on pitching and trying to catch baseballs and thus prevent scores) is far inferior to that of the Los Angeles Dodgers (based on hitting and seeking to score points). Plainly, the Red Sox lack confidence and will not win.

Remember, this critic himself cheerfully volunteers the fact that he knows very little about Latter-day Saint apologetics and has read almost none.

But neither the works published in Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship, nor the Interpreter Foundation’s books, nor its films (e.g., this and this), nor its other productions can reasonably be described as wholly or even predominantly “defensive.” Nor can the efforts of classic FARMS and its successor organization, the pre-2012 Maxwell Institute. Nor can my “Mormon Scholars Testify” website. Nor can the Journey of Faith films (e.g., this and this). Nor can my columns for the Deseret News and LDS Living. Nor can the work of Hugh Nibley.

Heck, just recently I’ve called specific attention to two Interpreter articles — “Revisiting ‘Sariah’ at Elephantine” and “Let There Be a Famine in the Land” — that offer positive reasons, small but not insignificant, for confidence in the historicity of the Book of Mormon. And there are many, many more.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

April 7, 2019

New Testament Notes 182-185

Next Post

April 8, 2019 And now you know the rest of the story.

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What kind of leaf did the dove bring back to Noah?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Grape leaf Olive leaf Fig leaf Palm leaf