Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

danpeterson

Thoughts on a few controversial topics related to science

Last updated on: March 20, 2019 at 1:09 pm   by Dan Peterson

Thoughts on a few controversial topics related to science 2019-03-20T13:09:15-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

 

A nebula

Public domain image from Caltech/NASA/JPL

 

The Age of the Earth

 

I’m sometimes described online as believing in a young Earth, even a literal six-day creation.

 

But youth, I suppose, is relative.  When I’m directly asked how old I believe the Earth to be, I always respond that it seems to be roughly 4.54 billion years old.

 

I hope that’s clear enough.

 

Evolution:

 

The evidence for evolution is, in my judgment, convincingly powerful.  Moreover, evolutionary theory seems to me one of the richest and most broadly applicable ideas in the history of science.

 

That said, I don’t accept the idea that evolution compels us to accept a purely purposeless, meaningless, and godless universe.  And, if the history of science is any guide, there will be plenty of twists and turns and modifications and amplifications and wrong turns and corrections in the future of evolutionary biology.

 

Intelligent Design:

 

Although I believe in God, my theistic worldview doesn’t compel or require me to accept specific propositions advanced by proponents of “Intelligent Design” or ID.   I could, for example, go instead with some form of theistic evolution.  And, in fact, that remains a possibility for me.

 

However, I find the ID movement’s ideas interesting, and worthy of consideration.  And I do think that some challenges remain for mainstream evolution and that ID theorists have been entirely within their rights to focus attention on them — e.g., the ultimate origin of terrestrial life, the emergence and encoding of complex information within plant and animal cells, the so-called “Cambrian Explosion,” etc.

 

I enjoy reading about these things.

 

So-Called “Paranormal Phenomena”:

 

I’ve recounted a particular autobiographical episode and will do so here again:

 

Many years ago, perhaps before I was married, I was in the offices of the family construction business.  My brother suddenly came out of his office and handed me two metal rods, each something like the thickness of a relatively heavy metal clothes hanger.  They were maybe 2.5 feet long (perhaps slightly more) and perfectly straight, except that roughly six inches of each were bent at a right angle.

 

He told me to hold them loosely in my hands, gripping the short portions but allowing them some “play,” and to walk slowly across the reception area.  I did so, holding them parallel in front of me.   At a certain place, they crossed.  And then, as I continued on, they fell apart again.

 

I was quite confident that I was not responsible for the movement in the rods.  So I walked across the reception area again.  And again.  And again.  Each time, the rods crossed at the same place in the room.

 

So I had the secretaries do it, too.  And a guest who came into the office while I was there.  And the mailman, when he came.

 

In each case, the rods crossed at that same location in the room.

 

Only once did this fail to occur.  That was in the case of our mechanic, Red Faler, a massive bear of a man who, I suspect, held the rods too tightly in his huge hands to allow them to move freely.

 

I asked my brother for an explanation.  He told me that there was a water pipe under the floor at the place where the rods crossed.  “Ah,” I said, “so it’s magnetism.”  No, he responded.  It was a clay pipe.

 

This seemed to me a clear case of water witching, or divining, or “dowsing.”  I had read about such things.

 

I found the experience — I find the experience — quite troubling.  It didn’t fit my worldview.  It still doesn’t.

 

I’ve mentioned this story publicly a few times, and it has drawn considerable scorn down upon me (in certain entirely predictable quarters) for my allegedly superstitious gullibility with regard to the “paranormal.”

 

But I propound no grand theory, I advocate no particular position on water witching, and I have no explanation.  I simply say that this happened to me.  I can’t deny that it did — and I think that to do so would be both dishonest and, in a very real sense, unscientific.  Since that time, I’ve read a little about water witching — not much, but enough to assure me that the statistical, scientific evidence seems powerfully arrayed against the effectiveness of the practice — and I’ve heard a few anecdotes (from people I respect) who report experiences similar to mine.  That’s where it stands.  On “dowsing,” anyhow.

 

Lately, too, I’ve been jousting a bit with my blog’s chief resident atheist ideologue on the question of telepathy.

 

He declares flatly that there is no evidence for it.  I respond that he hasn’t even looked.  He doesn’t seem to deny that.

 

Again, I have no special commitment to belief in ESP, clairvoyance, and telepathy.  I’ve always been skeptical of them, and my overall worldview will do perfectly fine without any of them.

 

As it happens, though, I read a couple of books about a decade ago that shook my attitude just a bit on that score:

 

Gary E. Schwartz, The Afterlife Experiments: Breakthrough Scientific Evidence of Life After Death (2003)

 

Elizabeth Lloyd Mayer, Extraordinary Knowing: Science, Skepticism and the Inexplicable Powers of the Human Mind (2008)

 

I went through a brief spasm of interest in the subject because of a side comment that I had read from the distinguished Anglo-American philosopher John Hick, who had briefly reported his own surprise at what he regarded as the unexpected strength of the evidence for seemingly “paranormal” mental properties.

 

I retain a skeptical but open mind on such topics.  I just don’t see closedminded dogmatism as a virtue.

 

 

Uncategorized

Previous Post



March 20, 2019

Leavening, or assimilation?

Next Post



March 20, 2019 A friendly tip for climbing the traditional Mount Sinai


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did King Nebuchadnezzar order everyone to worship?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A lion His crown A golden statue The sun

Related posts from Sic et Non

Family

Walking through History

Sic et Non

Family

Learning more about a region of which I've...

Sic et Non

Family

From Serbia's "White City," Belgrade

Sic et Non

Family

Accounts of Premortality?

Sic et Non

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

When Halloween Unmasks Married Hearts

Written by Dr. David K. Ewen from Eternal Truth Bible College Behind...

Jesus Was Not an Aristotelian

Aristotle. He’s been called the father of logic, the father of the...

Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey

Situated on the same square is Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey. ...

57th Dove Awards Honor Dolly Parton, Crown New...

On gospel music’s biggest night, the 57th annual GMA Dove Awards honored...

The First Eucharistic Controversy: Christ’s Real Presence

For Catholics, the Eucharist is the source and summit of the Christian...

What a Stop Sign Can Teach Us About...

How to Make a Decision When You Can't Hear God Main point:...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube