Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

danpeterson

New Testament Notes 21-24

Last updated on: February 6, 2019 at 9:52 pm   by Dan Peterson

New Testament Notes 21-24 2019-02-06T21:52:34-07:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

 

Image of Sea of Galilee from Wikimedia Commons

The Sea of Galilee, looking northward from Tiberias. Mount Hermon is visible in the background.    (Wikimedia Commons public domain)

 

Matthew 4:18-22

Mark 1:16-20

Luke 5:1-11

John 1:35-51

 

The accounts given by Matthew and Mark of the calling of the first disciples are quite similar, whereas the narratives of Luke and John offer rather different perspectives and details.

 

I’m struck by the fact that the disciples are said to have responded “immediately” (εὐθέως in Matthew 4:20; εὐθὺς in Mark 1:18) to the Savior’s invitation to follow him.

 

Latter-day Saints are sometimes criticized for inviting people to be baptized after only brief, simple, and incomplete lessons on the doctrines, history, and practices of the Restoration.

 

“Why don’t you tell them about the Mountain Meadows Massacre?” critics demand.  “Why haven’t you first fessed up about moon men and blood atonement and all the demands that the Church will place on their time?”

 

Well, I’m in favor of more information, rather than less, and I don’t think we have anything to hide.  (Some of the things that our critics demand that we reveal to our investigators simply aren’t true.)  But, frankly, there’s no biblical reason to believe that potential converts must be given a lengthy course of catechetical instruction prior to baptism.  There’s no evidence that Peter or James or John attended graduate courses in Christian theology prior to committing themselves to Jesus.  And I doubt very much that Peter knew, when he signed on, that his decision that day would eventually lead to his being crucified upside down in Rome.

 

They were called, and they responded to the call.  Immediately.

 

Matthew 16:17 seems to suggest that Peter’s conviction of Jesus came about through revelation rather than through careful human instruction or through research: “Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.”

 

And the account of Nathaniel’s conversion given at John 1:43-51 suggests precisely the same thing.

 

***

 

DS image from Wikimedia Commons

An 1894 photograph of Cana, in Galilee, by Daniel Shepp   (Wikimedia Commons public domain)

 

John 2:1-13

 

Just a brief note on the way, theologically, in which the gospel of John employs the miracles of of Jesus:

 

Characteristically, John uses the term σημεῖον (semeion, “sign”) to refer to the miraculous acts performed by Christ.  For example, in today’s reading, at John 2:11, the gospel is summing up the story of the miracle of changing water into wine:  “This, the first of his signs [ταύτην . . . ἀρχὴν τῶν σημείων], Jesus did at Cana in Galilee, and manifested his glory; and his disciples believed in him.”

 

Plainly, in John’s view, these acts aren’t important merely because they’re powerful, unexpected, and humanly inexplicable, but because they point to something else.  They signify something.

 

Thus, toward the end of the gospel, in 20:30-31, John summarizes what he’s written (and what he’s omitted) with this comment:

 

“And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book:  But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name.”

 

The author of John makes no pretense here of writing as a disinterested, scientific historian.  He’s trying to persuade his readers (or, mostly, in ancient times, his hearers) to accept Jesus as their Lord and Savior.  That’s not to say, of course, that his claims aren’t historically true.  It’s simply to say that historiography, as such, isn’t his primary goal.

 

 

Uncategorized

Previous Post



February 6, 2019

The Pope in Abu Dhabi

Next Post



February 7, 2019 "Can science explain everything?"


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the teaching about honoring parents?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Honor your father and mother Disobey Leave home early Ignore advice

Related posts from Sic et Non

Family

I came here freely, with neither garlic nor...

Sic et Non

Family

Looking at the Largest Orthodox Cathedral on Earth

Sic et Non

Family

The Iron Gates and the Lion of the...

Sic et Non

Family

Walking through History

Sic et Non

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

Christa Pike, Human Sacrifice

Tennessee wasn't just trying to kill Pike. It was trying to perform...

Chonda Pierce Brings Her Comedy to Mobile in...

Chonda Pierce has spent decades making audiences laugh from a stage. Now...

Our Season of Heartache: Do You Still See...

Our Season of Heartache: Do You Still See Me, Jesus? Today's topic...

The Grief of Healing: Being Found by the...

Oddly, I find that healing from grief is among grief's hardest parts....

Steph Curry, Warriors Guards: Slays Giants By God's...

  Steph Curry A Doubted Game-Changer? Steph Curry is one of the...

U.S. President Trump Keeps Looking Like a Russian...

The United States of America was largely formed by Europeans migrating here....

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube