Why I called him “it”

Last updated on: January 19, 2019 at 11:52 pm by Dan Peterson

Why I called him “it” 2019-01-19T23:52:25-07:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A view of the Grand Canyon (Wikimedia Commons public domain)
Is the Grand Canyon about medieval Indian history, perhaps, or contemporary Russian cinema?

A while ago, in two or three responses to comments on my blog, I referred to my blog’s most prolific atheist respondent in the third . . . um, third “person,” as “it.” (For the same reason, I’ve once or twice referred to him as a “meat unit” or a “cell colony.”)

The context, as I recall, was a discussion of the nature of consciousness, which he, in truly reductionist-materialist fashion insists on understanding — if, given his viewpoint, understanding is the appropriate word — as a function, pure and simple, of electrochemical brain states.

A small handful of my critics huffed and puffed for a day or two in righteous indignation at my use of the word it, until they found some new reason (what it was I can’t now recall) to lament my meanspirited viciousness. (One might think, at this point, that the flat fact that I breathe would be enough.) They couldn’t believe how vicious and demeaning I was being toward the poor fellow.

But I was just having some good clean fun while attempting to make a fairly serious (and, to me, fairly obvious) point. (At least one other commenter on my blog picked up the it for a short while.) I bear the fellow no ill will. He is, after all, a pretty likeable guy on the whole and, while I sometimes find him a bit exasperating, he’s always been civil and he’s sometimes even amusing — a trait that I value quite highly.

My point was simply this:

If “thinking” or “consciousness” is simply a physical process, if the brain secretes “thought” in a way not fundamentally unlike the liver’s secretion of bile, if “reasoning” is the product merely of physical processes that follow from prior physical processes, if it’s really nothing more than a train of biochemical events, then I wonder what value or relevance or significance it has. Is a mere chemical process really “about” anything? Can neurochemical events in an astronomer’s brain really be said to be “about” Mars or Proxima Centauri? Is oxidation — rusting — “about” anything? Do we ever utter or write sentences like “The iron rusted about the sea water”? Does anybody imagine that soil erosion is “about” anything else? Is it ever about, say, what caused the decline of the Roman Empire, or about whether Bach is a greater composer than Mozart, or about the interpretation of Shakespeare’s Hamlet? Is human digestion, another physical/chemical process, “about” the appreciation of paintings by Botticelli or the application of sp = sqrt [ (n1 – 1) * s12 + (n2 – 1) * s22 ] / (n1 + n2 – 2) ]?

And if there is, arguably, no real “thinking” going on in humans, but merely electrochemical processes that are determined and, in principle, thoroughly predictable from previous electrochemical states, what sense does it really make to speak of a “personality” or a “person”?

Hence, the “it.”

There are other possible entailments and implications, but those are for another day.

problem of consciousness

reductionism

scientism

spirit

Previous Post

January 15, 2019

CNN: "Move over, Vatican -- there's a new church in town!"

Next Post

January 15, 2019 Replying to a Critic of Islam (Part One)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who preached the first Christian sermon on Pentecost in Acts?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Philip Peter Paul James