Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

danpeterson

Continuing with the Middle Eastern Texts Initiative

Last updated on: September 5, 2018 at 9:52 am   by Dan Peterson

Continuing with the Middle Eastern Texts Initiative 2018-09-05T09:52:54-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

 

METI Chittick

We adopted a uniform cover desiign for each series within BYU’s Middle Eastern Texts Initiative.

 

We published another book by Averroës or Ibn Rushd — Averroës is a Latin corruption of a Hebrew corruption of his original Arabic name — when we issued the Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s De anima.  It appeared in a dual-language edition, with the original Arabic facing a translation by Alfred L. Ivry, who was, at the time, a professor in the Skirball Department of Hebrew and Judaic Studies and the Department of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies at New York University.

 

This is a slightly modified form of the summary that I believe I wrote for the book:

 

Averroës (AD 1126-1198), the greatest Aristotelian of the Islamic philosophical tradition, composed some thirty-eight commentaries on the “First Teacher’s” corpus, including three separate treatments of De Anima(“On the Soul”): the works commonly referred to as the Short, Middle, and Long Commentaries. The Middle Commentary—actually Averroës’s last writing on the text—remains one of his most refined and politically discreet treatments of Aristotle, offering modern readers Averroës’s final statement on the material intellect and conjunction as well as an accessible historical window on Aristotle’s work as it was interpreted and transmitted in the medieval period.

In the fourteenth-century Inferno of Dante Alighieri’s Divine Comedy, Averroës, described as the man “who made the Great Commentary,” appears along with other non-Christian Greek and Muslim thinkers and the great countercrusade sultan Saladin (Salah al-Din), in Limbo, the highest circle of Hell.  It was the best that Dante could do for him (and for such other figures as Plato and Aristotle and Homer and Dante’s own hero, the Roman poet Virgil), since he lacked Christian baptism.

 

With Mulla Sadra’s The Elixir of the Gnostics, which featured both the original Arabic text and, on the facing page, an English translation by William Chittick, of Stony Brook University in the State University of New York system, we moved to a very different thinker..

 

Here’s the summary text that (I believe) I wrote for it back in 2013:

 

Sadr al-Din Muhammad Shirazi (1572-1640), more commonly called Mulla Sadra, was one of the grand scholars of later-period Islamic philosophy and has grown to become one of the best-known Muslim philosophers. Iksir al-’arifin, or Elixir of the Gnostics, is unique among Sadra’s writings in that it reworks and amplifies an earlier Persian work, the Jawidan-nama (Book of the Everlasting) by Afdal al-Din Kashani, or Baba Afdal.

The underlying theme of Sadra’s amplification is emblematic of Muslim philosophy: the importance of self-knowledge in an individual’s journey of “Origin and Return,” the soul’s origins with God and its eventual return to Him. Everything, Sadra says, is on such a path, gradually disengaging from the material world and returning to a transcendent essence—all leading to a final fruition in which everything in the universe returns to God and finds permanent happiness. Philosophy, Sadra argues, is the most direct means to self-knowledge—and thus the best tool for navigating this journey.

 

Uncategorized

Previous Post



August 7, 2018

(Part of) the Price We Would Pay

Next Post



August 7, 2018 "Galactic Archaeology"


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the correct order of 'these three' that remain, as mentioned in 1 Corinthians 13?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Faith, hope, love Love, faith, hope Hope, faith, love Faith, love, hope

Related posts from Sic et Non

Family

I came here freely, with neither garlic nor...

Sic et Non

Family

Looking at the Largest Orthodox Cathedral on Earth

Sic et Non

Family

The Iron Gates and the Lion of the...

Sic et Non

Family

Walking through History

Sic et Non

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

When to Use AI and When Not To

Drawing on my new book with Trevor Sutton, "Irreplaceable: Humanity, Vocation, and...

Crabs in a Bucket: Why Evangelicalism Won’t Let...

There’s an old saying about crabs in a bucket. You don’t need...

Chapter 10, Elena: Progress

Open and Relational Theology & Social Psychology About this series: This series...

How Should We ‘Use’ Early Christians?

In his prefatory letter to the king of France in his Institutes...

Christa Pike, Human Sacrifice

Tennessee wasn't just trying to kill Pike. It was trying to perform...

Chonda Pierce Brings Her Comedy to Mobile in...

Chonda Pierce has spent decades making audiences laugh from a stage. Now...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube