Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

danpeterson

A few more thoughts on “scientism”

Last updated on: September 5, 2018 at 9:52 am   by Dan Peterson

A few more thoughts on “scientism” 2018-09-05T09:52:48-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

 

Is Rembrandt a greater artist than Vermeer? Let's count the atoms!

This scientist — note his white coat, which confers unquestionable authority on him — is either weighing the literary quality of Shakespeare’s “King Lear” or using spectral analysis to determine right and wrong in a moral quandary. Hung up on an ethical question? Ask a scientist to count it for you!
(Wikimedia Commons public domain image)

 

Unorganized notes from another as yet incomplete manuscript:

 

C. S. Lewis: “Let us suppose a race of people whose peculiar mental limitation compels them to regard a painting as something made up of little coloured dots which have been put together like a mosaic. Studying the brushwork of a great painting, through their magnifying glasses, they discover more and more complicated relations between the dots, and sort these relations out, with great toil, into certain regularities.  Their labour will not be in vain.  These regularities will in fact “work”: they will cover most of the facts.”[1]  But, of course, a very great deal will have been missed.

 

As has often been observed, “Science now functions in society rather as the Church did in the Middle Ages.”[2]

 

As the trenchant social critic Wendell Berry has observed,

 

This religification or evangelizing of science, in defiance of scientific principles, is now commonplace and is widely accepted or tolerated by people who are not scientists.  We really seem to have conceded to scientists, to the extent of their own regrettable willingness to occupy it, the place once occupied by the prophets and priests of religion.  This can have happened only because of a general abdication of our responsibility to be critical and, above all, self-critical.[3]

Religion . . . should not attempt to dispute what science has actually proved; and science should not claim to know what it does not know; it should not confuse theory and knowledge, and it should disavow any claim on what is empirically unknowable.[4]

In shallow water one may not risk much by postulating the existence of an as yet invisible stepping stone just beneath the surface.  But if the water is deep and swift, one should not start across if some of the stepping stones are hypothetical.[5]

Consilience, at any rate, shows us a man’s mind leaping with exuberant confidence from one merely conjectural stepping stone to another, oblivious of the rushing waters.[6]

 

[1] C. S. Lewis, Miracles: A Preliminary Study (New York: HarperSanFrancisco, 2001), 154-155.

[2] Stephen Edelglass, Georg Maier, Hans Gebert, and John Davy, The Marriage of Sense and Thought, 16.  [See this]

[3] Wendell Berry, Life is a Miracle: An Essay against Modern Superstition (Washington DC: Counterpoint, 2001), 19.

[4] Wendell Berry, Life is a Miracle: An Essay against Modern Superstition (Washington DC: Counterpoint, 2001), 98.

[5] Wendell Berry, Life is a Miracle: An Essay against Modern Superstition (Washington DC: Counterpoint, 2001), 37.

[6] Wendell Berry, Life is a Miracle: An Essay against Modern Superstition (Washington DC: Counterpoint, 2001), 38.

 

 

Uncategorized

science

science and religion

scientism

Previous Post



August 20, 2018

Some items on the character of Joseph Smith

Next Post



August 20, 2018 Education Week, Religious Liberty, and More


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Proverbs say about "a soft answer"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

It brings riches It brings rain It makes a fool wise It turns away wrath

Related posts from Sic et Non

Family

A case of twin near-death experiences?

Sic et Non

Family

Toward a "Post-Materialist Science"?

Sic et Non

Family

A great American thinker on dogmatic scientific orthodoxy

Sic et Non

Family

Of Spheres, Spirals, Spindles, and the Divine

Sic et Non

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

57th Dove Awards Honor Dolly Parton, Crown New...

On gospel music’s biggest night, the 57th annual GMA Dove Awards honored...

The First Eucharistic Controversy: Christ’s Real Presence

For Catholics, the Eucharist is the source and summit of the Christian...

What a Stop Sign Can Teach Us About...

How to Make a Decision When You Can't Hear God Main point:...

Archdiocese Hosts Military Marriage Retreat in Germany

RASTATT, Germany — The transient military lifestyle, with its frequent deployments and...

Minted in God's Image

Nearly every morning, I make the drive to Detroit with my high-school-age...

The Real AI Story Is Adoption Without Trust

Artificial intelligence has crossed a political threshold. It is no longer a...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube