Self-refuting materialism?

Last updated on: September 5, 2018 at 9:53 am by Dan Peterson

Self-refuting materialism? 2018-09-05T09:53:25-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Magdalen Tower, from High Street
Magdalen College, Oxford, where C. S. Lewis spent much of his academic career, was founded in 1458.
(Wikimedia Commons public domain image)

On Wednesday, I posted a quotation from G. K. Chesterton’s classic 1908 book Orthodoxy:

“Rebelling against everything?”

In my opinion, the point that he was making there is akin to an argument later made by C. S. Lewis and then by Thomas Nagel.

In 2012, Nagel, an eminent professor of philosophy at New York University — perhaps most widely known for his famous 1970s article “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?” — published Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False with Oxford University Press.

In it, Nagel voiced support for various scholars (e.g., Michael Behe, David Berlinski, and Steve Meyer) associated with the so-called Intelligent Design movement. But that was scarcely the most significant aspect of his book.

In a review of Mind and Cosmos for the New York Review of Books (7 February 2013) titled “Awaiting a New Darwin,” the evolutionary geneticist H. Allen Orr, Shirley Cox Kearns Professor of Biology at the University of Rochester, sympathetically summarized part of Nagel’s thesis as follows:

“Consciousness is the most conspicuous obstacle to a comprehensive naturalism that relies only on the resources of physical science. The existence of consciousness seems to imply that the physical description of the universe, in spite of its richness and explanatory power, is only part of the truth, and that the natural order is far less austere than it would be if physics and chemistry accounted for everything.”

As Nagel himself puts it in Mind and Cosmos,

“Evolutionary naturalism provides an account of our capacities that undermines their reliability, and in doing so undermines itself.”

C. S. Lewis had made a similar point decades earlier in his book Miracles, contending that a strict materialism refutes itself:

“If my mental processes are determined wholly by the motions of atoms in my brain, I have no reason to suppose that my beliefs are true . . . and hence I have no reason for supposing my brain to be composed of atoms. . . .

“A theory which explained everything else in the whole universe but which made it impossible to believe that our thinking was valid would be utterly out of court. For that theory would itself have been reached by thinking, and if thinking is not valid that theory would, of course, be demolished. It would have destroyed its own credentials. It would be an argument which proved that no argument was sound — a proof that there are no such things as proofs.”

Lewis’s argument was easy for some to ignore, if not so easy to refute, because, of course, he was a very vocal Christian theist and apologist. Thomas Nagel presents a different sort of challenge, however, and he is not so casually to be dismissed. He is an atheist.

Posted from Newport Beach, California

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 5, 2018

Three more quotations from the great G. K. Chesterton

Next Post

July 6, 2018 Once more on women and the priesthood

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What occupation did Peter, Andrew, James, and John have before following Jesus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Tax collectors Fishermen Politicians Scribes