Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

danpeterson

Adolf Hitler and Charles Darwin

Last updated on: September 5, 2018 at 9:52 am   by Dan Peterson

Adolf Hitler and Charles Darwin 2018-09-05T09:52:56-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

 

Mr. Darwin, looking glum

Charles Darwin, in 1881
(Wikimedia Commons public domain image)

 

The most recent iteration of the bi-weekly column that Bill Hamblin and I write for the Deseret News was published on 20 July 2018.  Titled “Was Hitler Religious?” and following Richard Weikart’s book Hitler’s Religion: The Twisted Beliefs that Drove the Third Reich (Regnery History, 2016), we set forth the claim that Hitler was neither an atheist nor a Christian but, almost certainly, a pantheist who deified Nature and who derived his ethical views from what is commonly referred to as “social Darwinism.”

 

A few of our critics have claimed in response that, in that column, Dr. Hamblin and I were blaming Charles Darwin for the Nazi Holocaust.  We are, they suggest, at war with BYU’s geology and biology faculty.

 

However, if we had wanted to make such an accusation, we would have made it.

 

A word, first of all, about Dr. Hamblin’s background, which would make him — if he were such — a very unlikely crusader against Darwinism or evolution or a very ancient Earth:  He is a son of the longtime BYU geology professor W. Kenneth Hamblin (d. 2009; Ph.D., University of Michigan), who specialized in the study of the tectonic geomorphology of the Colorado Plateau and the Grand Canyon and who was, among other things, the author or co-author of such books as Exploring the Planets: An Introduction to Planetary Geology, which went through at least twelve editions; Earth’s Dynamic Systems, which was published in at least ten editions; Recognition of Ancient Sedimentary Environments; Anatomy of the Grand Canyon; Beyond the Visible Landscape: Aerial Panoramas of Utah’s Geology; and Cambrian Sandstones of Northern Michigan.  I’ve never heard either of the Drs. Hamblin express any sentiment against evolution.  Quite the contrary, in fact.

 

Nor, for that matter, am I myself an avowed enemy of evolution.

 

These critics need to read more carefully and respond with few jerks of the knee, and perhaps they need to know a bit more about English intellectual history and/or the history of science and philosophy.

 

The term social Darwinism wasn’t coined by Charles Darwin (d. 1882), and Mr. Darwin didn’t advocate the doctrine known under that rubric.  (It must be admitted, however, that his half-cousin Sir Francis Galton [d. 1911], heavily influenced by the publication of Darwin’s Origin of Species in 1859, was an early and energetic proponent of eugenics.)  Rather, it was the English philosopher, biologist, and sociologist Herbert Spencer (d. 1903), who is little read today but who was extremely popular during his lifetime, who elaborated what came to be known as “social Darwinism” — and who, along the way, also coined the phrase survival of the fittest, which is often falsely attributed to Darwin.

 

So Dr. Hamblin and I weren’t blaming Charles Darwin for the horrors of Nazism.  We weren’t even blaming Herbert Spencer, who, I’m confident, would have been horrified by the Third Reich.  Darwinism, as such, isn’t responsible for Hitler and the Holocaust.  Nor, even, is social Darwinism.  But social Darwinism is, quite indisputably, an extrapolation from Darwinism, and, to a significant degree, Nazi racial ideology was an extrapolation from social Darwinism.  Does Darwinism entail social Darwinism?  No.  Does social Darwinism entail Nazism?  No, it does not.  But the blend of a social Darwinist ethic and a program of eugenics can, very plainly, be toxic.

 

Posted from New York City

 

 

Uncategorized

Previous Post



July 30, 2018

"Is Faith Compatible with Reason?"

Next Post



July 30, 2018 “Muslim Identity” (Part 9)


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Jesus" name mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Anointed one God saves Messiah Savior

Related posts from Sic et Non

Family

One of My Weirder Days (Not Today)

Sic et Non

Family

Reflections on the Attempted Revolution in France

Sic et Non

Family

I came here freely, with neither garlic nor...

Sic et Non

Family

Looking at the Largest Orthodox Cathedral on Earth

Sic et Non

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

Tennessee: Don't Shoot Christa Pike or Anyone Else

Tennessee: Don't Shoot Christa Pike or Anyone Else Tennessee tried to kill...

One of My Weirder Days (Not Today)

  The newest episode of Becoming Brigham went up on Monday morning....

Meet Catholic Fantasy Writer Gen Ponce- 60th Interview

As of this article, I have now reached 60 interviews in my...

The Dating Recession: Why 70% of Singles Aren't...

If you’re single and dating feels unusually hard right now, you’re not...

The Great Matter: Walking the Zen Way

(This talk was delivered by Dharma Holder Mo Myokan Weinhardt at the...

Netflix Narnia Update

The official trailer for the Netflix Narnia movie has been released.  Director...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube