Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

danpeterson

“The Angel of Fredericksburg”

Last updated on: September 5, 2018 at 9:53 am   by Dan Peterson

“The Angel of Fredericksburg” 2018-09-05T09:53:36-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

 

At the Sunken Road

Confederate troops commanded by Generals Cobb and Kershaw fire at attacking Union soldiers from behind a stone wall during the Battle of Fredericksburg.
(Wikimedia Commons public domain)

 

My wife and I spent a substantial portion of our day yesterday visiting the Civil War battlefield at Fredericksburg, perhaps the bloodiest single area, taken as a whole, of the entire conflict (and, thus, in the domestic history of the United States).  There’s plenty of reason for sorrow in the history there, at the cruelties that humans have visited upon one another and, sometimes, at our sheer stupidity.

 

There are, however, some stories out of Fredericksburg that offer some comfort and encouragement.  Most prominent among them, perhaps, is the story of Richard Rowland Kirkland, who was, at the time, serving as a sergeant in the Second South Carolina Volunteer Infantry.

 

Kirkland had already fought at the First Battle of Bull Run (or, in Confederate parlance, the First Battle of Manassas), as well as at Savage’s Station, Maryland Heights, and Antietam.

 

On 13 December 1862, the Second South Carolina Volunteer took up a position behind the stone wall that lined the Sunken Road at the base of Marye’s Heights, near Fredericksburg.  In the action that followed, they inflicted heavy casualties on the Union troops charging against them.  On the morning of December 14, it became apparent that over 8,000 Union soldiers had been shot before that stone wall at Marye’s Heights. Many of those remaining on the battlefield were still alive, but they were suffering terribly (and some very audibly) from their wounds and from thirst.

 

By far the most important source regarding Kirkland’s alleged actions that day is Confederate general J. B. Kershaw of South Carolina, Kirkland’s commanding officer during the battle.  His account appears in a letter that he wrote on 2 January 1880 to the Charleston News and Courier, which is titled “Richard Kirkland, the humane hero of Fredericksburg.”

 

De Weldon does Kirkland

A 1965 statue of Richard Rowland Kirkland at Fredericksburg by the Austrian-American sculptor Felix de Weldon  (Wikimedia Commons public domain)

 

According to General Kershaw, Sergeant Kirkland approached him and said, very emotionally, “General, I can’t stand this.”  When the general asked him what he meant, he replied: “All day I have heard those poor people crying for water and I can stand it no longer. I come to ask permission to go and give them water.”

 

Kershaw responded, “Kirkland, don’t you know that you would get a bullet through your head the moment you stepped over the wall?”

 

After some back and forth between the two, General Kershaw overcame his reluctance and permitted Sergeant Kirkland to go.

 

Armed with all of the water-filled canteens he could carry, the young Confederate soldier crossed the wall and, under a shower of bullets, provided water to the nearest victim he could reach, helped him into a more comfortable position, and left him a canteen.  At this point, his purpose now being understood, the Union troops withheld their fire, and for an hour and a half, he went from from wounded man to wounded man while his comrades filled canteens for him.  (According to General Kershaw, they were prevented from actually joining him out on the battlefield by orders against their crossing the line.)

 

Richard Rowland Kirkland went on to fight at Chancellorsville and then at Gettysburg where, according to his commanding officer, General Kershaw, he was promoted (for “conspicuous gallantry”) to the rank of lieutenant.  On 20 September 1863, he was fatally shot during the Battle of Chickamauga.  He was just twenty years old.  It is said that his last words were “I’m done for . . . Save yourselves, and please tell my Pa I died right.”

 

“I doubt not,” wrote General Kershaw, “that he wears now a bright crown bestowed by Him who promises that a cup of cold water given in the right spirit shall not lose its reward.”

 

In hearing the legendary story of Sergeant Kirkland, one naturally thinks of the remarkable story of Desmond Doss, recently told in Mel Gibson’s remarkable film Hacksaw Ridge.

 

It must be said, however, that some have cast serious doubt upon General Kershaw’s story of Richard Rowland Kirkland, which only appeared nearly three decades after the Battle of Fredericksburg.  See, for example, “Is the Richard Kirkland Story True?”  (However, see, too, the often rather spirited comments that follow Michael Schaffner’s critique.)

 

Whatever one may think of the specific details regarding Sergeant Kirkland at Fredericksburg, J. B. Kershaw’s letter speaks very powerfully to what, amidst all the evils and sorrows of this fallen world, we desire to be and what we hope and wish to be ultimately true.

 

Posted from Richmond, Virginia

 

P.S.  In the context of this discussion of such folks as Desmond Doss and Richard Kirkland, I need to pass on an important communication from one of my anonymous email correspondents.  This particular writer participates on a predominantly ex-Mormon atheistic message board belonging to a certain “Dr. Shades.”  For reasons best known to the secretive fellow, he often likes to share his deepest thoughts with me and to express his feelings about . . . well, about me.  (He’s done so frequently for a number of years now.)  Thus far this week, he’s offered two comments.  One of them, alas, contains language that I don’t permit on this blog.  The other, though, is marginally acceptable, and I think his insights deserve to be shared.  Here’s his message:  “pimpin plumper.  garrulous gobbler.  lyin lardass.”

 

 

Uncategorized

Previous Post



June 6, 2018

The conversion of Paul Claudel

Next Post



June 7, 2018 Once more, Joseph Wilford Booth


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What animal was most often sacrificed for a sin offering in the Old Testament?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A goat A bird A lamb A bull

Related posts from Sic et Non

Family

Looking at the Largest Orthodox Cathedral on Earth

Sic et Non

Family

The Iron Gates and the Lion of the...

Sic et Non

Family

Walking through History

Sic et Non

Family

Learning more about a region of which I've...

Sic et Non

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

Everything: Learning Hip Hop Theomusicology from Lauryn Hill

"My hold things; they have not distinguished between the hold and unhold,...

Monday Miscellany, 10/19/26

The limits of indoctrination.  Techs think AI will cure cancer, so smoking...

'You Can See Everything': A Film Without a...

If you're looking to find the hero in the strange and riveting...

Westminister Abbey-- Part Two

One can get either depressed or impressed by walking around on the...

Theodore Dwight Weld: Evangelical Poster Boy to Drop...

Last time I discussed the spiritual crisis that engulfed Angelina Grimké in...

Jesus and the Law of Moses: An Interview...

It is my pleasure to interview Paul Sloan on his recent book,...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube