Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

danpeterson

A victory for religious liberty, and for liberty in general

Last updated on: September 5, 2018 at 9:53 am   by Dan Peterson

A victory for religious liberty, and for liberty in general 2018-09-05T09:53:36-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

 

SCOTUS Bldg. in twilight

The Supreme Court Building in Washington DC   (Wikimedia Commons)

 

I was very pleased by the Supreme Court’s 7-2 decision yesterday in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.  Here are some worthwhile initial commentaries written in response to the decision:

 

“Broad Enough to Matter”

 

“Masterpiece Cakeshop Ruling Is a Win for Religious Freedom, But . . . “

 

“In Masterpiece Cakeshop, Justice Kennedy Strikes a Blow for the Dignity of the Faithful”

 

“Christian Baker 1, Officious Bureaucrats 0”

 

“What Does the Masterpiece Cakeshop Decision Say About the Free Speech Claim?:  Four Justices opined on this issue, with Justices Thomas and Gorsuch saying that requiring bakers to make cakes for same-sex weddings is an unconstitutional speech compulsion, and Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor saying the opposite.”

 

“The Court’s Religious Discrimination Reasoning in the Masterpiece Cakeshop Case:  Why did the Court find that Colorado acted based on hostility to religion — and thus violated the Free Exercise Clause — and not just based on hostility to sexual orientation discrimination?”

 

***

 

In honor of the Supreme Court’s decision, here are some quotations from John Stuart Mill’s great essay On Liberty:

 

“If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.”

 

“Society can and does execute its own mandates: and if it issues wrong mandates instead of right, or any mandates at all in things with it ought not to meddle, it practices a social tyranny more formidable than many kinds of political oppression, since, though not usually upheld by such extreme penalties, it leaves fewer means of escape, penetrating much more deeply into the details of life, and enslaving the soul itself.”

 

“A state which dwarfs its men, in order that they may be more docile instruments in its hands even for beneficial purposes–will find that with small men no great thing can really be accomplished.”

 

“The object of this Essay is to assert one very simple principle, as entitled to govern absolutely the dealings of society with the individual in the way of compulsion and control, whether the means used be physical force in the form of legal penalties, or the moral coercion of public opinion. That principle is, that the sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self-protection. That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant. He cannot rightfully be compelled to do or forbear because it will be better for him to do so, because it will make him happier, because, in the opinions of others, to do so would be wise, or even right. These are good reasons for remonstrating with him, or reasoning with him, or persuading him, or entreating him, but not for compelling him, or visiting him with any evil, in case he do otherwise. To justify that, the conduct from which it is desired to deter him must be calculated to produce evil to someone else. The only part of the conduct of any one, for which he is amenable to society, is that which concerns others. In the part which merely concerns himself, his independence is, of right, absolute. Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign.”

 

 

Uncategorized

Previous Post



June 4, 2018

Three Nobel laureates on science and God

Next Post



June 5, 2018 Introducing Joseph Wilford Booth


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In the Parable of the Good Samaritan, who is the true neighbor?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Samaritan The Levite The priest The robber

Related posts from Sic et Non

Family

I came here freely, with neither garlic nor...

Sic et Non

Family

Looking at the Largest Orthodox Cathedral on Earth

Sic et Non

Family

The Iron Gates and the Lion of the...

Sic et Non

Family

Walking through History

Sic et Non

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

Chapter 10, Elena: Progress

Open and Relational Theology & Social Psychology About this series: This series...

Christa Pike, Human Sacrifice

Tennessee wasn't just trying to kill Pike. It was trying to perform...

Chonda Pierce Brings Her Comedy to Mobile in...

Chonda Pierce has spent decades making audiences laugh from a stage. Now...

Our Season of Heartache: Do You Still See...

Our Season of Heartache: Do You Still See Me, Jesus? Today's topic...

The Grief of Healing: Being Found by the...

Oddly, I find that healing from grief is among grief's hardest parts....

Steph Curry, Warriors Guards: Slays Giants By God's...

  Steph Curry A Doubted Game-Changer? Steph Curry is one of the...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube