Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

danpeterson

A few more lines on Lebanon

Last updated on: September 5, 2018 at 9:53 am   by Dan Peterson

A few more lines on Lebanon 2018-09-05T09:53:41-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

 

Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris (Wikimedia Commons)

 

Some additional paragraphs:

 

“Beirut’s enduring lesson for me,” writes Thomas Friedman, “was how thin is the veneer of civilization, how easily the ties that bind can unravel, how quickly a society that was known for genera­tions as the Switzerland of the Middle East can break apart into a world of strangers.[1] This too is a lesson taught by the Book of Mormon and one reason why it can be said that that volume is increasingly relevant to the situation in which mankind finds itself today. Fortunately, the Book of Mormon also teaches us the path we must take to avoid such situations as those of the Nephites, the Jaredites, and the unfortunate people of Beirut.

When the Israelis invaded Lebanon in 1982, they did so in order to put an end to Palestinian raids into the north of Israel. Yasir Arafat and his men had too many weapons there for them to feel entirely comfortable. But in the twelve months leading up to the invasion, there had only been one Israeli death inflicted by Pal­estinians operating out of Lebanon. The Israelis plainly had other things to think about, other concerns that moved them to launch the invasion when they did. It is not unreasonable to conclude that they were worried about the quasi-state that Yasir Arafat and his men had built up in Lebanon and about Arafat’s new role as a kind of statesman (based upon his new role as a Lebanese warlord), which was giving him too much international respectability for their liking.

Unfortunately, the Israelis did not understand Lebanon. Not at all. They invaded to come to the aid of the Maronite Christians of the country, who were locked in a war with the Sunni Muslims (among whom were the PLO) and with the Druze. The Israelis tended to see the Maronites as much like themselves, representa­tives of Western civilization getting no gratitude from backward Arab Muslims despite all the good they were trying to do. It seemed to the Israelis that Lebanon was, or was supposed to be, a Christian society, just as Israel was a Jewish society, and that each was afflicted with a troublesome bunch of Islamic primitives.

This view was simply not true. As Thomas Friedman puts it, the then Israeli prime minister, Menachem Begin, and other Israelis

did not notice that these “Christians” they were going to save in Lebanon were not a group of hooded monks living in a besieged monastery but, rather, a corrupt, wealthy, venal collection of mafia-like dons, who favored gold chains, strong cologne, and Mercedeses with armor plating. They were Christians like the Godfather was a Christian.[2]

It was, for a while, common to see television advertisements in which conservative Protestants appealed to their audience to donate money to help the suffering and persecuted Christians of Lebanon. There is abso­lutely no question that innocent Christians were suffering in Leba­non, but to portray the struggle there as one between virtuous followers of Jesus who wanted only to be left alone and evil anti-Christian Muslims was utterly misleading. The soulful eyes of the children shown on such advertisements were genuinely moving, but they could as easily have been the eyes of Muslim children, for there were innocent Muslims suffering there as well. The battle was not so much about faith as it was about control of insurance rackets and smug­gling and, in the end, about vengeance for past wrongs. It was the ancient Arab principle of blood vengeance come back to life. But that prin­ciple is pagan Arab, not Christian.

[1] Friedman, From Beirut to Jerusalem, 47*.*

[2] Friedman, From Beirut to Jerusalem, 137*.*

 

Posted from Paris, France

 

 

Uncategorized

Previous Post



May 25, 2018

Part of the problem to which Christ's resurrection is the solution

Next Post



May 25, 2018 "Will We Still Enjoy Pinot Noir?"


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In 1 Peter 1, what does Peter say is more valuable than gold?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Wisdom Righteousness Charity Faith

Related posts from Sic et Non

Family

Reflections on the Attempted Revolution in France

Sic et Non

Family

I came here freely, with neither garlic nor...

Sic et Non

Family

Looking at the Largest Orthodox Cathedral on Earth

Sic et Non

Family

The Iron Gates and the Lion of the...

Sic et Non

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

Which is the Greatest Commandment?

Every religious practice, doctrine, tradition, and interpretation must ultimately be measured through...

What Was the Sin of Judas?

Whenever people talk about betrayal, the name of Judas can’t help but...

Trump Is Changing the USA from Being a...

Yesterday, in front of the White House before the media, President Donald...

The Ravana We Burn, the Ravana We Worship

From the Gond communities of central India to the Brahmins of Rajasthan...

Smart people saying smart things (10.20.26)

Take time to listen to Libby Garland, Molis Augustave, Nicole Noren, Soraya...

The Abolition of Man: Appendix: The Tao

Here I continue our discussion of C. S. Lewis’s book The Abolition...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube