Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

danpeterson

Did random chance demand the existence of a stellar system suited to life?

Last updated on: April 10, 2018 at 11:57 am   by Dan Peterson

Did random chance demand the existence of a stellar system suited to life? 2018-04-10T11:57:53-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

 

Earth from Space

A composite NASA (public domain) image of Earth

 

From Gerald L. Schroeder’s God According to God: A Scientist Discovers We’ve Been Wrong About God All Along (New York: HarperOne, 2009):

 

If the strong nuclear force were a bit more or less forceful, if electromagnetic forces varied by a few percent, if there were four or two spatial dimensions instead of the three within which we reside (length, width, height), the stability of the physical world would be gone.  Without the Pauli exclusion principle that teaches that no two particles can occupy identical positions at the same time, and the quantized electron orbits, stable atoms could not form.  There’d be no predictable chemistry or chemical reactions, no life.  Nuclear chaos would be the order of the day.  (55-56)

 

Did random chance demand that there be one or even many well-suited stellar systems in our universe?  The answer is not at all obvious.  Recall the one case out of  10700 for getting a Shakespearean sonnet by chance.  Compare the magnitude of that number with the number of stars in the visible universe: approximately 1022.  Now, 1022 is a huge number, but it pales when contrasted with 10700.   Obviously getting sonnets and evolving life are two very different concepts.  But both are measures of chance producing a desired arrangement.  With the sonnet-writing monkey trials, there are 26 variables (the letters of the alphabet) that had to align in 500 distinctive ways.  In our universe to win the lottery for life there are 1022 options, 1022 stars in the visible universe, each offering its own unique environment.  Around how many of those stars will there be planets with conditions favorable to life?  If there are, for example, 15 parameters essential for producing a planet or moon with a life-nurturing climate, and only 3 or 4 percent of the total cosmic range of each of those 15 variables places it within a domain fit for life, then the likelihood of life arising by chance in our universe becomes marginal.  (56-57)

 

***

 

Here’s a curious item.  Not quite Book-of-Mormon-related, really, but curious nonetheless.  And it even involves “sunstones”:

 

“Viking seafarers may have navigated with legendary crystals”

 

***

 

Some additional science news from various fields, chosen because it interested me and might interest you:

 

“Could Higgs Bosons and Primordial Black Holes Explain Dark Matter?”

 

“Spear Point Study Offers New Explanation of How Early Humans Settled North America”

 

“Why Neanderthals Had Faces That Were So Different From Ours”

 

“Are the Milky Way’s borders expanding?  Observing similar galaxies could provide clues to our own rate of inflation.”

 

An item on the human element in science:

 

“Why the Nobel Prize might need a makeover: An astrophysicist whose dreams were dashed by dust discusses the award’s downsides in a new book”

 

And, sometimes, the more you look at something the less certain you are about it:

 

“Scientists Still Can’t Decide How to Define a Tree: We think we know what trees are, but even at the level of genetics, it’s difficult to find what separates them from other plants.”

 

 

Uncategorized

argument from design

design

design argument

fine-tuning

intelligent design

Previous Post



April 4, 2018

The Rise of Zionism

Next Post



April 4, 2018 Martin Harris, the Careful Investigator


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

According to Jesus, what defiles a person?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Clothing Food eaten What comes out of the heart Money

Related posts from Sic et Non

Family

This Wednesday, at 4 PM, Utah time

Sic et Non

Family

What if Wallace had prevailed, rather than Darwin?

Sic et Non

Family

Living the Good Life!

Sic et Non

Family

"Water, water everywhere, nor any drop to drink"

Sic et Non

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

16 Spiritual Touchstones for a More Grounded Life

  After decades of spiritual study, here are 16 principles I try...

Catholic Evangelization: Sharing Your Faith Every Day

Welcome back to the Graceful Awakening mini-series called, “From Faith to Mission.” ...

The Pillar of the Boatmen: the Ancient Monument...

The Pillar of the Boatmen is a Romano-Gaulish sculpture that dates from...

Westminster Abbey-- Part One

In one sense walking into Westminster Abbey is like walking down the...

'Super Scam Me' Exposes AI Jon Bon Jovi...

Leslie Pickett believed she was in a relationship with Jon Bon Jovi....

The Brazilian Remake of Kendricks' 'Flywheel' Opens in...

“Flywheel,” the story that launched the Kendrick Brothers’ filmmaking career is getting...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube