Cyrus of Persia, the Ottoman Empire, and the Balfour Declaration

Last updated on: April 5, 2018 at 10:06 pm by Dan Peterson

Cyrus of Persia, the Ottoman Empire, and the Balfour Declaration 2018-04-05T22:06:30-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A mountain in Jordan’s Wadi Rum, where the recent film “The Martian” was filmed, along with the movie “Lawrence of Arabia.” (Much of the actual story of T. E. Lawrence — which revolves around British assistance for the “Arab Revolt” against the Ottoman Empire — occurred here.) Despite its spelling “Rum” here is actually pronounced “ramm,” and it probably derives from an Aramaic word meaning “elevated.” (Compare the Book of Mormon term “Rameumptom.”)
(Wikimedia Commons)

Nearing the conclusion of chapter six:

Despite numerous dissenting voices, the political Zionist movement began to gain momentum during the First World War, in which Great Britain defeated the Ottoman Empire and freed much of the Arab world, including Palestine, from Turkish domination. Latter-day Saints, too, tended to look upon the fall of Jerusalem into the hands of the British as “one of the steps in the foretold gathering of the Jews in the latter days, and as the beginning of the fulfillment of ancient and modern prophecy.”[1] They were undoubtedly correct to do so. In 1917, the British government issued the so-called “Balfour Declaration,” which pledged support for a Jewish national homeland in Palestine. And when, in 1920, the British began to carry out the League of Nations mandate that gave them authority to administer Palestine, they acted on the basis of that Balfour Declaration. This came in direct fulfillment of a prophecy given by Orson Hyde in 1842:

It was by political power and influence that the Jewish nation was broken down, and her subjects dispersed abroad; and I will here hazard the opinion, that by political power and influence they will be gathered and built up; and further, that England is destined in the wisdom and economy of heaven to stretch forth the arm of political power, and advance in the front ranks of this glorious enterprize.[2]

In many respects, the Balfour Declaration can be compared with the decree issued by the great Persian ruler Cyrus, in 536 B.C., which permitted a remnant of the Jews to return from Babylon and to rebuild Jerusalem. Nevertheless, however much it may have been part of the divine plan, British intervention on behalf of the Jews brought an angry and often violent response from the Arab residents in Palestine. And, in many ways, it must be admitted that the Arab response was thoroughly understandable. For the situation of Palestine in the twentieth century after Christ was not comparable in all respects with the situation in the sixth century before his birth. Some differences can be briefly alluded to here:

The Babylonian captivity, for all its trauma, lasted only half a century or thereabouts. There were undoubtedly people living in Palestine who still remembered the Jews before them being carried off into captivity, just as there were almost certainly exiles living in Babylon at the time of Cyrus’s decree who still recalled their homes in Judea. The modern diaspora, on the other hand, was nearly two thousand years old. Other people had settled in Palestine and had sent down deep roots in that land. It was, they felt, their land. They could certainly argue—and did—that whatever legal claim the Jews might once have had on the land had long since lapsed. Furthermore, the land of Palestine had never really been entirely swept clean. There were people there whose families almost certainly go back to the time before the dispersion of the Jews, whose roots were deeper still. It is highly probable that some among these actually were Jews, even if they had long forgotten the fact. How could the land not belong to those who had possessed it for two millennia?[3] Those in Palestine who still professed to be Jews were distinctly in the minority well into the twentieth century.

Cyrus was exercising his right, as ruler of the Persian Empire, to transfer people to any part of the empire that he chose or to allow them to move themselves. Palestine was an undisputed part of his empire. In the twentieth century, however, Palestine was not part of the British Empire. It had, it is true, been part of the Ottoman Empire. But the Arabs had fought alongside the British, against the Ottoman Turks, to win independence for themselves and their lands. Their sense of nationalism was riding high. They did not understand it to be the right of the British or of anybody else to grant their land to anyone, however altruistic the act might be. (It is easy, as we all know, to be generous with somebody else’s money.)

And as people of the twentieth century, they were less inclined, perhaps, than ancient people were to admit that a ruler, any ruler, has a right to transfer populations around and to grant and bestow whole countries without the consent of their inhabitants.

[1] See “Editor’s Table: The Fall of Jerusalem” in Improvement Era 21, 259-61. The quotation occurs on p. 261, where the editor says that “the Saints are glad to behold the signs of the coming day.”

[2] Orson Hyde, in The Latter-day Saints’ Millennial Star (11 March 1842), 168-69.

[3] Many Americans today probably feel much the same way about Indian and Mexican claims to parts of the United States. Even if these claims have some validity—as in many instances they undoubtedly do—it is widely felt that simply too much water has gone under the bridge. Too much time has elapsed. To give Los Angeles back to Mexico, or to give Arizona back to the Indians, evicting the non-Mexican or non-Indian populations of these places, would be to perpetrate yet another huge injustice. After a certain lapse of time, old injustices must often be allowed to continue. Or, frankly, they must be forgotten. To choose an example from the very period in which the Jewish dispersion began, we would consider it odd if the French or the English began to file damage claims against Italy based on injuries suffered under Roman occupation.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

April 5, 2018

A Slice of Life

Next Post

April 6, 2018 "Highly skewed toward fitness for life"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was healed of leprosy after washing seven times in the Jordan River?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ben-hadad Hezekiah Naaman Hazael