You could have done better!

Last updated on: April 1, 2018 at 11:54 am by Dan Peterson

You could have done better! 2018-04-01T11:54:45-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

‘The Thinker” (Le Penseur”), by Rodin, located at the Musée Rodin in Paris
(Wikimedia Commons public domain)

I sometimes receive notes from a fellow — an active Latter-day Saint, so far as I can tell — who likes to tell me that what I do, and what my associates do, is often quite poorly done. Late last year, for example, on the spur of the moment (literally so), I posted a quick fundraising appeal on Facebook that managed to bring in several thousand dollars for the Interpreter Foundation. (I’m grateful for the generosity of those who contributed, mostly in modest amounts.) This fellow’s response to the fundraising appeal, though, was to write to tell me that, while he was thinking about making a donation, he probably wouldn’t, because, well, he just isn’t very enthused about Interpreter. (And, in the end, true to his word, he gave nothing. But I’m deeply grateful that, along the way, he kept me informed about the unlikelihood of his making a contribution!)

More recently, he’s written again to tell me that he just doesn’t think very highly of many of my blog entries and of Interpreter — even though, he assures me, he loves certain other Mormon-related periodicals. He apparently bought a few copies of our Interpreter journal some time back and, after they had sat on his shelf for a while, finally decided to take a gander at one of them. His verdict? There are, he reports, “significant issues in some of the articles,” including but not necessarily limited to “weird leaps of logic.” Still, he admits, he “could be wrong.”

“Apologetics has its place,” he tells me, “but some of it feels like a cousin of conspiracy theories: building up tons of small, inconsequential fragments that lead you to believe that Mickey Mouse killed JFK.”

Well. I would simply like to respond, to this fellow and to others who might be inclined to similar expressions, that such comments are absolutely useless.

As of this week — quite without mentioning the podcasts, scripture roundtables, blog entries, books, conferences, radio broadcasts, scripture study aids, Old Testament KnowWhys, video-recorded lectures, and other things produced by the Interpreter Foundation — Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture has published roughly 325 articles by approximately 125 distinct authors.

In other words, there is no single Interpreter style or topic or method or approach.

Telling me that he finds “weird leaps of logic” and other “significant issues in some of the articles” (although he “could be wrong”) and that “some” apologetics seems silly to him, on a par with crazy conspiracy theories, is of absolutely no help at all.

What’s needed is specific allegations of poor logic, with specific references. Page numbers would be helpful. Airy dismissals of apologetics generally and vague gestures in the direction of unspecified problems serve to communicate disapproval and disdain, it’s true, but otherwise convey nothing at all, and they can’t be evaluated.

I’m reminded of a very famous passage from Theodore Roosevelt’s speech “Citizenship in a Republic,” delivered at the Paris Sorbonne on 23 April 1910:

It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.

But, frankly, I would be less put off by such a critic if he actually tried to point out how we stumble, or where we could have done better. When all he says is that he finds what we do uninteresting, silly, and/or poorly reasoned, without offering specifics, I confess that I’m disinclined to take him seriously, or to care what he has to say, or to appreciate it. I have little patience for such comments.

End of rant.

***

I had an enjoyable dinner this evening with Joseph Spencer, Ralph Hancock, Noel Reynolds, and my former student Nathan Oman — possibly Noel’s and Ralph’s former student, as well — who is visiting from Williamsburg, Virginia. Interesting conversation is one of life’s greatest pleasures.

Previous Post

March 28, 2018

"The immense legacy of Miletus"

Next Post

March 29, 2018 "Occidentosis"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What city is considered holy by Christians, Jews, and Muslims alike?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jerusalem Rome Antioch Paris