Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Latter-day Saint
“Nothing comes from nothing. Nothing ever could.”

“Nothing comes from nothing. Nothing ever could.”

Last updated on: January 17, 2018 at 1:43 pm by Dan Peterson

“Nothing comes from nothing. Nothing ever could.” 2018-01-17T13:43:12-07:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The classic spiral Whirlpool Galaxy (M51), with the smaller yellowish galaxy NGC 5195 drifting behind it in the upper right of this Hubble satellite image. (Wikimedia Commons public domain)

Lawrence Krauss is a physicist at Arizona State University — and a very vocal atheist who believes that the universe came out of “nothing” (or, at least, could have done so) without the aid of a divine creator (e.g., in his A Universe from Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing [2012]).

Amir Aczel (1950-2015) was an Israeli-born American mathematician and historian of mathematics — author of, among numerous other books, Fermat’s Last Theorem: Unlocking the Secret of an Ancient Mathematical Problem (1997); Entanglement: The Greatest Mystery in Physics (2002); Present at the Creation: The Story of CERN and the Large Hadron Collider (2010); and A Strange Wilderness: The Lives of the Great Mathematicians (2011).

In his book Why Science Does Not Disprove God (New York: William Morrow HarperCollins, 2014), Dr. Aczel takes aim at Professor Krauss with regard to what he sees as Krauss’s sloppy — even cheating — definition of “nothingness”:

In set theory, the foundational structure of mathematics, there is one basic concept called the empty set, also known as the null set. The empty set is that which contains no elements at all. This is as close as the human mind can come to understanding nothingness. Pure nothingness is defined as the contents of the empty set. This unique set contains nothing at all: no space, no time, no directions, no elements, no forces, no substance, no ideas, no notions, no rules. Nothing!

If you want to get a feel for this kind of complete and unqualified emptiness, draw a circle as a “something” — it contains a piece of space: it is a something, not a nothing. Now, shrink this circle slowly until it becomes a single point. Once the point is the only thing left, erase it. Now you have emptiness: not a piece of paper — that is gone, too, along with the space, directions such as up and down and left and right, and any elements whatsoever.

Such complete emptiness means nothingness — no space and no points and no directions. From such a complete emptiness, no universe can ever arise. It is here that Krauss and others go wrong. Pure emptiness is something so deeply devoid of any entity that nothing can come out of it. In the Vilenkin model, on which Krauss’s universe-from-nothing theory is based, a preexisting quantum foam must exist. And yet the mathematical empty set is far emptier than the quantum foam: it stands for complete and unqualified emptiness. It is a “nothing,” while the quantum foam is, of course, a “something,” leaving open the big question of how the universe and its particles of matter were ever created. (225-226)

By the way, does anybody out there recognize the source of the title of this blog entry?

***

There’s a whole lot out there that we don’t know and haven’t even seen:

“Voyage into the dark sector: A hidden world of particles awaits.”

***

A note on science and public policy:

“How Free Markets Neutralize Junk Science”

***

I can’t say that I’m particularly surprised:

“The New Age of Astrology: In a stressful, data-driven era, many young people find comfort and insight in the zodiac—even if they don’t exactly believe in it.”

For a society marked by the rise of the religious “nones,” particularly among Millennials and younger members of Gen X, there is inevitably a hunger for meaning and for guidance. Astrology offers both, but without commitments, without moral demands (especially as regards sexual behavior), and without the sometimes irksome demands of belonging to a community.

In my view, advocates of traditional religion — among whom, for my purposes here, I classify myself and other believing Latter-day Saints — should pay attention to such phenomena as this. They offer openings, ways of appealing to an audience for whom the usual approaches have lost appeal.

***

This article seems closely related:

“Using the Internet May Prompt Religious ‘Tinkering’ Rather than Belief in Only One Religion”

Uncategorized

Previous Post

January 16, 2018

Star Stuff

Next Post

January 17, 2018 Regarding Jihad

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which king of Judah destroyed Nehushtan, the bronze serpent?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Josiah Hezekiah Uzziah Manasseh