“Focusing on the essentials in the biblical story of creation”

Last updated on: January 4, 2018 at 10:40 am by Dan Peterson

“Focusing on the essentials in the biblical story of creation” 2018-01-04T10:40:20-07:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Although once thought to be a rare actual photograph of the Big Bang, this image is now widely believed to be a forgery on account of the stars in the background. Stars hadn’t yet formed at the time of the Big Bang. (Wikimedia Commons public domain)

My very first angry, mean-spirited, ad hominem attack-column for 2018 has now appeared in the Deseret News:

“Focusing on the essentials in the biblical story of creation”

Just this morning, alas, I found a passage that would have fit perfectly into my column (had there been space in the column in which to fit it!). It comes from David Wilkinson, God, Time and Stephen Hawking: An Exploration Into Origins (London: Monarch Books, 2001). Rev. Dr. Wilkinson is speaking about the “Big Bang.” First, a preliminary historical note:

This term was coined by one of the most vehement critics of the Big Bang, Sir Fred Hoyle, as a term of derision dropped into a radio broadcast for a theory that he described as being about as elegant as a party girl jumping out of a cake! (45-46)

Here’s the passage I would like to have incorporated into my column:

The expansion was so rapid and so violent that it is helpful to think of it in terms of an explosion — the Big Bang. However, we must be careful of the term, as an explosion suggests the sense of something that creates destruction and disorder. It also suggests ‘bits’ flying out into something, which we will see is not the case. A better picture may be the blooming of a flower, that is something that gives rise to order and beauty. (47)

Incidentally, Rev. Dr. Wilkinson is a British theologian — he holds a Ph.D. in systematic theology — affiliated with St. John’s College at the University of Durham. So what does he know? He also happens to have earned a Ph.D. in theoretical astrophysics, focusing on the study of star formation and the chemical evolution of galaxies, and he is a Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Another incidental comment:

Among the most (unintentionally) amusing aspects of god is Not Great, the best-selling New Atheist screed written by the late Christopher Hitchens, was its treatment of Sir Fred Hoyle (d. 2001), whom Hitchens wrote off as “an ex-agnostic who became infatuated with the idea of ‘design’” (65). There can be little doubt that, had Hitchens realized the truth about Hoyle, Hoyle would — like all of the other atheist writers and scientists cited in the book — have been both “distinguished” and “brilliant.” Others certainly thought he was.

He was, for instance, elected to the Royal Society of London (1957), the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (1964), the United States National Academy of Sciences (1969), the Royal Irish Academy (1977), and the American Philosophical Society (1980). His many honors include the United Nations Kalinga Prize and the Gold Medal of the Royal Astronomical Society in 1968, the Bruce Medal from the Astronomical Society of the Pacific in 1970, a knighthood in 1972, the Royal Medal of the Royal Society in 1974, the Dag Hammarskjöld Gold Medal, the Karl Schwarzchild Medal of the Astronomische Gesellschaft of Germany in 1992, the Balzan Prize in 1994, and the Crafoord Prize from the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences in 1997.

Martin Rees, Astronomer Royal of England as well as professor of cosmology and astrophysics and master of Trinity College at the University of Cambridge, paid tribute to him at his death in 2001, saying,

Hoyle’s enduring insights into stars, nucleosynthesis, and the large-scale universe rank among the greatest achievements of 20th-century astrophysics. Moreover, his theories were unfailingly stimulating, even when they proved transient. He will be remembered with fond gratitude not only by colleagues and students, but by a much wider community who knew him through his talks and writings.

Sir Fred Hoyle seems an unlikely ignoramus.

But Hitchens’s error is even deeper and more painful than that. He seems to have imagined that Hoyle’s derisive rejection of Big Bang cosmology (and his advocacy of the now-defunct rival “Steady State” theory) was resulted from Hoyle’s supposed desire to defend a theistic notion of creation. But Hoyle hated what he mocked as the “Big Bang” precisely because, as an atheist, he thought it came too close to the biblical doctrine of divine creation (“Let there be light!”).

After all, one of the originators of the Big Bang theory was the great Belgian mathematician, physicist, and (ugh!) Catholic priest Father Georges Lemaître. And, in 1951, no less a figure than Pope Pius XII had commented on the theory as follows,

Thus, with that concreteness which is characteristic of physical proofs, it [science] has confirmed the contingency of the universe and also the well-founded deduction as to the epoch when the cosmos came forth from the hands of the Creator. Hence, creation took place in time. Therefore, there is a Creator. (cited at Wilkinson, 25)

Uncategorized

Previous Post

January 3, 2018

Tributes to President Monson, the last living witness to a great revelation

Next Post

January 4, 2018 The Qur’an, on Hell (Plus a Note on Dating)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I went uninvited before the king, risking death, saying 'If I perish, I perish.' Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ruth Esther Deborah Vashti