“Most scientists now reject the idea that the first Americans came by land”

Last updated on: November 8, 2017 at 12:02 pm by Dan Peterson

“Most scientists now reject the idea that the first Americans came by land” 2017-11-08T12:02:37-07:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A McDonald’s restaurant in Clovis, New Mexico, in 2010 (Wikimedia Commons photo by j2003af)

When I was growing up in California, critics of the Book of Mormon quite commonly opposed it to the theory that the first Americans had arrived from Asia via a prehistoric land bridge, now submerged, located at the Bering Straits.

It was, supposedly, an either/or. If the Book of Mormon is true, so the reasoning went, it must account for the origin of every Amerindian before Columbus. On the other hand, went the corollary, if the Bering Straits theory is true the Book of Mormon must be false.

I’ve long since seen through that false dichotomy. I can’t remember exactly when I abandoned it. Perhaps well before I hit my twenties.

So recent news about the current state of the science on Amerindian origins isn’t, in my judgment, of direct relevance to the question of the historical authenticity, or the historicity, of the Book of Mormon:

“Most scientists now reject the idea that the first Americans came by land: Researchers embrace the kelp highway hypothesis in ‘a dramatic intellectual turnabout.'”

(Thanks to Noel Reynolds for bringing the article above to my notice.)

But it is relevant to another matter:

During my childhood, the Bering land bridge was — so far as I was aware, in any case — unassailable scientific orthodoxy. To doubt that the ancestors of all Amerindians arrived in the New World by crossing it was to reject science itself and to withdraw into irrational obscurantism. But now it turns out that, like so many other bits of science that I once knew, it’s not true. Or, anyway, not the whole truth. (I also “knew,” when I was quite young, that electrons were very much like small planets orbiting the nuclei of atoms, that ulcers were caused by stress, that eggs were bad for you, and that the steady-state theory of cosmology was a viable alternative to the Big Bang.)

The point of this post is not to cast doubt upon science — which is a very human enterprise but also a remarkably successful, valuable, intriguing, and admirable one. It’s simply to remind us all that we need to be humble and provisional, even when we think we have it all figured out. And, of course, I simply find the subject interesting.

***

Which naturally leads to a curious item that’s been making the rounds a bit and that was sent to me just a few days ago:

“Here is what DNA scientists claim about Cherokees descent and it’s not what you think!”

My immediate reaction to it was skeptical. I thought that I had encountered it before, although the date on this particular article is quite recent. In any event, as I tend to do in such matters, I passed it on for comment from my friend Dr. Ugo Perego, a Latter-day Saint geneticist (and a bishop) in Rome. Here’s the relevant portion of his reply:

“The title is highly misleading as there are no ‘scientists’ involved with the described study. The man behind the initial claim is Donald Yates, ‘principal investigator’ of the not-so-popular DNA Consultant commercial company. Dr. Yates is the only one with a PhD in his staff, with a doctorate in Classical Studies. The claims made are not supported by mainstream scientific publications and no one is really taking the conclusions or DNA Consultants seriously.”

Uncategorized

Previous Post

November 8, 2017

"A mere impostor . . . would have broken down."

Next Post

November 8, 2017 The New Hale Centre Theatre, in Sandy, Utah

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Mordecai refused to bow down to Haman.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE