Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Latter-day Saint
What about the Book of Mormon?

What about the Book of Mormon?

Last updated on: October 13, 2017 at 2:02 pm by Dan Peterson

What about the Book of Mormon? 2017-10-13T14:02:06-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The marquee at the Eugene O’Neill Theater on Broadway in New York City
(Wikimedia Commons public domain)

Another passage from a manuscript in progress:

What kind of a book did Joseph Smith produce?

Bernard DeVoto, a literary critic from the mid-twentieth century, denounced it as “a yeasty fermentation, formless, aimless, and inconceivably absurd.”[1] But this is precisely what the Book of Mormon is not.[2] Hugh Nibley, almost certainly to be considered the leading modern student of the Book of Mormon, is much more accurate when he remarks that, “If any modern man, however great his genius, composed the Book of Mormon, it must of necessity swarm with the uncouth, monstrous, impossible, contradictory, and absurd. But it does not.”[3] Perhaps, like an outspoken later critic of the book, Bernard DeVoto had never actually read it.[4] As the Catholic sociologist Thomas F. O’Dea once remarked, “the Book of Mormon has not been universally considered by its critics as one of those books that must be read in order to have an opinion of it.”[5]

Cultural historian Terryl Givens cites an interesting article from the nineteenth century Baptist publication, the Religious Herald:

The April 9 issue for 1840 has an editorial under the heading “The Mormons”: “A correspondent requests information as to the peculiar tenets of this modern sect. We have never seen a copy of the book of Mormon, nor any abstract of their creed upon which we could fully rely, as a fair exposition of their opinions.” This frank admission does not, however, preclude a summary verdict: “The book of Mormon is a bungling and stupid production. . . . It contains some trite, moral maxims, but the phraseology . . . frequently violates every principle and rule of grammar. We have no hesitation in saying the whole system is erroneous . . .”[6]

George Cannon of Liverpool read the book through twice and concluded that “A bad man could not have written it and a good man would be afraid to. It is from God.” Or, as an alternative version of his reaction phrases it, “No wicked man could write such a book as this; and no good man would write it, unless it were true and he were commanded of God to do so.”[7]

The physician Willard Richards had a similar reaction. Opening the book at random, without any idea of its overall structure and contents, before he had even read half a page, he declared that “God or the devil has had a hand in that book, for man never wrote it.” He read the book through twice over a period of about ten days, and was baptized by Brigham Young on 31 December 1836, at Kirtland, Ohio.[8]

Parley Pratt:

I read all day; eating was a burden, I had no desire for food; sleep was a burden when the night came, for I preferred reading to sleep.

As I read, the spirit of the Lord was upon me, and I knew and comprehended that the Book was true, as plainly and manifestly as a man comprehends and knows that he exists. My joy was now full.[9]

George Cannon’s son, the extremely intelligent George Q. Cannon (who would later go on to edit newspapers, found a major publishing company, impress Charles Dickens, and serve as both a territorial delegate to Congress and a counselor to four presidents of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints), served for nearly four years (1850-1854) as a missionary in the Sandwich or Hawaiian Islands when he was in his early twenties. Hawaii was not yet the tourist and resort paradise that it would later become. Most of Cannon’s mission was spent on the island of Maui, where, at first, he was often alone among people whose language, customs, and culture were utterly alien to him. “For the first year after I left home,” he later recalled,

I could scarcely think about it without my feelings getting the better of me. . . . Their very food was foreign to me and unlike anything I had ever before seen or tasted. I was much of the time separated from my companions, the Elders. Until I mastered the language and commenced preaching and baptizing the people, I was indeed a stranger among them. Before I commenced holding regular meetings, I had plenty of time for meditation, and to review all the events of my short life, and to think of the beloved home from which I was so far separated. It was then that I found the value of the Book of Mormon. It was a book which I always loved. But I learned there to appreciate it as I had never done before. If I felt inclined to be lonely, to be low spirited or home-sick, I had only to turn to its sacred pages to receive consolation, new strength and a rich outpouring of the Spirit. Scarcely a page that did not contain encouragement for such as I was. . . . No man can read it, partake of its spirit and obey its teachings, without being filled with a deep love for the souls of men and a burning to zeal to do all in his power to save them.[10]

[1] Bernard DeVoto, “The Centennial of Mormonism,” American Mercury 19/5 (January 1930): 5. [Check original.]

[2] An excellent short summary of the Book of Mormon is Hugh Nibley, “The Mormon View of the Book of Mormon,” in Hugh Nibley, The Prophetic Book of Mormon, edited by John W. Welch (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book and FARMS, 1989), 259-264. A shorter version of Professor Nibley’s article was first published in the multilingual journal Concilium: Theology in the Age of Renewal 30 (New York: Paulist Press, 1968), 170-173; in the British version of the same publication, Concilium: An International Review of Theology 10 (December 1967): 82-83; and in the French, Portuguese, and German equivalents.

[3] Nibley, “New Approaches to Book of Mormon Study,” 116.

[4] Sterling McMurrin claimed that he was unable “to take the Book of Mormon seriously as an authentic record, considering the claims of its coming from an angel and being translated by a miracle.” He explained that it “has a confused theology.” He also acknowledged that he had “never read the entire Book of Mormon.” See L. Jackson Newell, ed., Matters of Conscience: Conversations with Sterling M. McMurrin on Philosophy, Education, and Religion (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1996), 114.

[5] Thomas F. O’Dea, The Mormons (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1957), 26.

[6] Cited in Terryl L. Givens, The Viper on the Hearth: Mormons, Myths, and the Construction of Heresy (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), 86.

[7] See Davis Bitton, George Q. Cannon: A Biography (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1999), 34; also 478 note 5.

[8] See Black, Stories from the Early Saints, 66.

[9] Parley P. Pratt, Autobiography of Parley P. Pratt. (Find original.]

[10] Cannon, My First Mission, 58, 59. [See original.]

Posted from St. George, Utah

Uncategorized

Previous Post

October 13, 2017

Joseph Smith: A diamond, perhaps, but very much "in the rough"

Next Post

October 14, 2017 It's No Longer the Southern Utah That I Knew as a Child

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Zion" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Holy Place Promised Land Fortress City of God