Joseph Smith as Fraud

Last updated on: October 19, 2017 at 3:48 pm by Dan Peterson

Joseph Smith as Fraud 2017-10-19T15:48:58-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Philadelphia Pennsylvania Temple (Wikimedia Commons public domain)

Notes from a manuscript:

Drawing on principles enunciated by the great German scholar Friedrich Blass, Hugh Nibley has argued that, in examining the authorship of a document whose authenticity is in dispute, the initial presumption should always be that the document is what it claims to be. Lightly assuming the existence of a genius forger is, for a number of reasons, not a sound scholarly method.[1] Yet, of course, that is precisely what is most commonly done in the case of Joseph Smith, the Book of Mormon, and the other documents that he gave to the world.

It was long felt that Joseph Smith concocted the Book of Mormon, for example, out of a deliberate desire to deceive. Perhaps (rather foolishly, considering the way his life actually turned out) Joseph thought that the scheme was a good way to make money. As Hugh Nibley remarks, Joseph is assumed to be “a forger who at one moment is so clever and adroit as to imitate the archaic poetry of the desert to perfection and supply us with genuine Egyptian names, and yet so incredibly stupid as to think that the best way to fool people and get money out of them is to write an exceedingly difficult historical epic of six hundred pages.”[2] Nonetheless, and despite its credibility problems, this remains a popular view in many circles.[3] Still, more recently, a few have suggested a kinder, gentler version of the thesis that he was a conscious deceiver. They contend that, perhaps, he wrote the Book of Mormon as a pia fraus, a well-intended deception, a “pious fraud.”[4] For instance, a Lutheran pastor wrote a book in 1980 in which he argued that Joseph designed, by means of his Book of Mormon, to combat the heresy of deism, to reconcile sectarian factions, and to defend the existence of God.[5] There have also been discussions, to which we shall return below, about whether or not Joseph acted alone in creating the Book of Mormon and, indeed, Mormonism in general. Many have believed that he must have had allies and co-conspirators.

With regard to the notion that Joseph might have been sincere but mistaken, many theories have been proposed. It has been suggested, for instance, that Joseph was an epileptic—as if that, even if it were true, would really explain anything. It has also been proposed that he was paranoid, or psychologically dissociative. For reasons that will partially but clearly appear below, such explanations simply will not account for the facts. It seems, therefore, that, as Hugh Nibley has insisted, “Joseph Smith was either telling the truth or he was a criminal—not just a fool—and no sentimental compromises will settle anything.”[6] Finally, though, some, particularly among fundamentalist Protestants, have contended that he was demonic.[7] Such charges are, by nature, more difficult to deal with, since they can accept virtually all evidence but, by turning it on its head, effectively dismiss it. Again, though, as we shall see, the overall tenor of Joseph Smith’s story and the content of the works he produced seems to rule them out.

[1] See Hugh Nibley, “New Approaches to Book of Mormon Study,” in Hugh Nibley, The Prophetic Book of Mormon (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book and FARMS, 1989), 55-57; also Friedrich Blass, “Hermeneutik und Kritik,” in Iwan von Müller, ed., Handbuch der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft, vol. 1, Einleitende und Hilfs-Disziplinen (Munich: Beck, 1886), 127-272 (especially 268-271). [See Blass.]

[2] Nibley, “New Approaches to Book of Mormon Study,” 59.

[3] Insert source from Barnes and Noble.

[4] The notion, and the phrase, are borrowed from Ovid, Metamorphoses, 9:711.

[5] Robert N. Hullinger, Mormon Answer to Skepticism: Why Joseph Smith Wrote the Book of Mormon (St. Louis: Clayton Publishing House, 1980); reissued in revised form as Robert N. Hullinger, Joseph Smith’s Response to Skepticism (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1992).

[6] Nibley, “New Approaches to Book of Mormon Study,” 65.

[7] See Louis C. Midgley, “Who Really Wrote the Book of Mormon? The Critics and Their Theories,” in Noel B. Reynolds, ed., Book of Mormon Authorship Revisited: The Evidence for Ancient Origins (Provo: FARMS, 1997), 101-139, for a chronicle and analysis of several basic responses to the Book of Mormon.

***

By the way, an extraordinarily — but characteristically — vicious new column has appeared in the Deseret News:

“Love and the divine fellowship”

The malignant narcissism of its author is almost overpowering.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

October 19, 2017

Under the floor of heaven

Next Post

October 20, 2017 Early Islam as a kind of "superclan"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which book follows Proverbs in the Old Testament?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ecclesiastes Psalms Isaiah Song of Solomon