Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Latter-day Saint
On the supposed obligation to “validate” the experiences of critics

On the supposed obligation to “validate” the experiences of critics

Last updated on: September 9, 2017 at 8:44 pm by Dan Peterson

On the supposed obligation to “validate” the experiences of critics 2017-09-09T20:44:30-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Philadelphia Pennsylvania Temple (Wikimedia Commons public domain)

I’m delighted that we’re rapidly approaching the debut of the Lee Groberg film Joseph Smith: American Prophet, which is a substantial revision of the 1999 PBS film, also directed by Lee Groberg, titled American Prophet: The Story of Joseph Smith:

https://vimeo.com/226371146/3599537230

Happily, those who have created this new film were able to retain the original’s narration by the late great Gregory Peck.

***

Here’s a new blog entry from Matt Roper, formerly a colleague of mine at FARMS and the Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship, and now affiliated with Book of Mormon Central:

“What is the significance of chiasmus in the Book of Mormon?”

It offers a number of worthwhile links to articles that you might want to explore.

***

The invaluable Robert Boylan calls our attention to this helpful item regarding one of the most controversial aspects of the life of Joseph Smith:

“Q&A: Joseph Smith’s Polygamy: Separating Fact from Fiction”

***

I was busy deleting some old computer files and came across a curious item. I’m not quite sure where it came from, nor who wrote it nor when, but it’s addressed to me:

If you want to know if Mormonism is hurtful – listen to the critics. Validate their experiences, don’t diminish them. Don’t blame their trauma on their faithlessness.

Invalidating people who are really struggling with religious issues tends to increase their self doubt and hopelessness. They feel broken and alone for not fitting in with the indoctrination.

I would recommend that you Dan Peterson recuse yourself from any such conversations in the future. Your own talk shows that you have the smell of blood on your hands if not the stain.

Speak to struggling members leaving the JW or Christian Science or other faiths also being disrupted by the Google age. Mormon bitter apostates are no less traumatized.

I suppose that I’ll respond to it here, since I can’t recall whether or not I responded directly to its author and since it expresses sentiments that I’ve encountered more than once. (I won’t bother with the hyperbolic claim that I have blood on my hands, nor with the unreasonable demand that I should never again enter into discussions of the merits or demerits of my church and faith.)

First of all, yes, it’s important to respond to earnest and suffering people with as much charity and sympathetic understanding as one can muster. That, I think, goes without saying for any serious disciple of Christ and, for that matter, for any reasonably decent person.

Having said that, I don’t think that listening to critics is the only thing that one must do in determining whether Mormonism is “hurtful.” Don’t the voices of those who seem to be satisfied with their Church membership count, as well? And don’t we need to try to sort truth from falsehood? Might some sociological and statistical and other data not be useful?

At the height of a messy and angry divorce between two people who have been one’s good friends, it would seem to me to be unfair and unwise simply to take at face value the complaints or allegations of one spouse about the other.

Talk of “validating,” and of not “invalidating,” the experiences of people who claim to have been hurt seems to me a reasonable request if it signifies taking them seriously and responding empathetically. If, however, it means that one must believe everything such people say and grant its complete accuracy without question, then it strikes me as a form of emotional blackmail and as remarkably cavalier and indifferent toward truth.

To take a dramatic parallel: There are, of course, genuine rapes. And rape is a terrible crime. Moreover, rape victims have often, historically, been treated with cold and wounding skepticism. I should hardly need to say that such responses are horribly wrong. On the other hand, not every allegation of rape is true — and those who are accused of the offense are also entitled to a fair hearing and to justice.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

September 9, 2017

"Brights" and . . . Dims?

Next Post

September 10, 2017 "It's a good thing God does things I wouldn't"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the primary legal document in Biblical times?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Scroll Contract Tablet Land deed