Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

danpeterson

More silly foolishness from people who don’t understand science and mathematics

Last updated on: August 23, 2017 at 6:19 pm   by Dan Peterson

More silly foolishness from people who don’t understand science and mathematics 2017-08-23T18:19:08-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

 

A beautiful nebula

Nebula (Wikimedia Commons public domain)

 

As I noted yesterday, I’ve recently been reading work by the late Israeli-American mathematician, statistician, and historian of science Dr. Amir Aczel (d. late 2015, of cancer), who is probably most widely known for his bestselling 1997 book Fermat’s Last Theorem.

 

Here’s a passage from Amir D. Aczel, Why Science Does Not Disprove God (New York: Willam Morrow, 2014), 2-3:

 

As a science writer concentrating on mathematics, physics, and cosmology, I have marveled myriad times about what to me is one of the greatest mysteries of all: how, within the immensely hot and dense “soup of particles” that constituted our universe, a fraction of a second after the Big Bang, the quarks suddenly gathered in threes: two “ups” and a “down” to form protons and two “downs” and an “up” to form neutrons.  How was it ever possible, I have asked myself, that the charges of these quarks turned out to be exactly 2/3 for an “up” and -1/3 for a “down” — with not even the tiniest of tiny errors, so that the proton would miraculously match the opposite charge of the electron (-1) and the neutron’s charge would be precisely zero: just what is necessary to form atoms and molecules?  How did such an incredibly improbable event ever happen without some calculated act of creation?  And further, how did the masses of the elementary particles turn out to have the perfectly precise ratios needed so that our world of atoms and molecules could exist at all?  How did the forces of nature — gravity, electromagnetism, and the weak and strong nuclear forces acting inside nuclei, as well as the mysterious “dark energy” that permeates space — receive just the right strengths they need to maintain a universe that has the required stability and neither collapses onto itself nor explodes before life has had a chance to evolve?  It is hard to imagine all this happening just by chance.

 

Compare this item, from the Anglo-Australian astrophysicist Dr. Paul Davies, AM (Member of the Order of Australia), who is currently a professor at Arizona State University:

 

Scientists are slowly waking up to an inconvenient truth – the universe looks suspiciously like a fix. The issue concerns the very laws of nature themselves. For 40 years, physicists and cosmologists have been quietly collecting examples of all too convenient “coincidences” and special features in the underlying laws of the universe that seem to be necessary in order for life, and hence conscious beings, to exist. Change any one of them and the consequences would be lethal. Fred Hoyle, the distinguished cosmologist, once said it was as if “a super-intellect has monkeyed with physics.”

To see the problem, imagine playing God with the cosmos. Before you is a designer machine that lets you tinker with the basics of physics. Twiddle this knob and you make all electrons a bit lighter, twiddle that one and you make gravity a bit stronger, and so on. It happens that you need to set thirtysomething knobs to fully describe the world about us. The crucial point is that some of those metaphorical knobs must be tuned very precisely, or the universe would be sterile.

Example: neutrons are just a tad heavier than protons. If it were the other way around, atoms couldn’t exist, because all the protons in the universe would have decayed into neutrons shortly after the big bang. No protons, then no atomic nucleuses and no atoms. No atoms, no chemistry, no life. Like Baby Bear’s porridge in the story of Goldilocks, the universe seems to be just right for life.

 

Posted from San Diego, California

 

 

Uncategorized

Previous Post



August 22, 2017

On the sheer evil of the history of southern Utah

Next Post



August 23, 2017 Some Thoughts About the Temple


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In the Gospel of Luke, how does the Virgin Mary learn of her pregnancy?

Select your answer to see how you score.

From the Angel Gabriel Joseph From the wise men From Elisabeth

Related posts from Sic et Non

Family

"The Price of Faith? The Fire of Covenant!"

Sic et Non

Family

Notes toward planning my funeral

Sic et Non

Family

Two experiences with C. S. Lewis after his...

Sic et Non

Family

In praise of a former Dutch politician

Sic et Non

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

On the aesthetics of Saddam Hussein

What's up with all the gold? We've seen it before. We all...

Archaeology and the Revelation of John: A Visual...

Archaeology and the Revelation of John: A Visual Guide by David A....

The Bishops Admitted that Trump Used Them. That...

I wrote a post on Monday in which I described the humiliating...

Sunday Readings: The Call to Holiness

The readings for the Solemnity of All Saints present a powerful message...

Why Demons Hate Halloween

A lost letter from Screwtape's Desk on the perils of Halloween-- My...

What Americans Think Is Essential for a Fulfilling...

A study found that most Americans consider "having good friends" to be...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube