Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Latter-day Saint
Why I intend to vote for Evan McMullin tomorrow

Why I intend to vote for Evan McMullin tomorrow

Last updated on: November 7, 2016 at 11:36 am by Dan Peterson

Why I intend to vote for Evan McMullin tomorrow 2016-11-07T11:36:38-07:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Evan McMullin, speaking in Provo, Utah (Wikimedia Commons)

First of all, let’s stipulate that Hillary Clinton is a terrible candidate. If she had any charisma, if she weren’t so obviously cynical and corrupt (though see here), she would be light years ahead of the Republican nominee. And, yes, she’s very liberal. More so, I think, than her husband, who was always something of a pragmatist.

I’ve been a libertarian-leaning conservative since I was old enough to hold political views. It astonishes me that I now view the likely election of Mrs. Clinton with resigned indifference. But I do.

And that’s because the Republican Party nominated Mr. Donald J. Trump, a man whom I regard as utterly unfit for the presidency. Not merely because he’s crass, vulgar, unprincipled, and immoral, but because he’s ignorant and thoughtless, because he’s not a conservative but an authoritarian populist demagogue, because he proposes massive government intervention in free markets, because he’s appealed quite consciously (in my judgment) to an angry strand of “alt-right” zealots who reek of xenophobia and white nationalism and religious bigotry, because he’s advocated war crimes, because he’s shown utterly no interest in limited-government constitutionalism, because he’s expressed admiration for thugs such as Vladimir Putin and the rulers of Beijing and the Kims of North Korea, because he’s idly toyed with the idea of destroying our treaty-relationships with long-term allies and even with the use of nuclear weapons, because his attacks on other Republicans and conservatives have gravely damaged both the Party and the conservative movement, because he shows a blithe indifference to nuclear proliferation, and because I strongly suspect that he’s psychologically unstable. His weird late-night tweets, his obsessive pursuit of revenge against any and all criticism, even when it’s from little people like the family of a slain Muslim soldier or a former beauty queen, his continual threats of lawsuits, his juvenile personal insults (“Crooked Hillary,” “Little Marco Rubio,” “Lying Ted,” and on and on and on and on) suggest to me a curiously adolescent narcissism. I think he would be easily manipulated by clever operators such as Mr. Putin.

I cannot vote for Donald Trump.

When people tell me that he’s a brilliant businessman, I want to know where the evidence for that claim might be. I’ve seen nothing. Various examinations of his wealth have indicated that, given the amount of money he inherited from his father, he would have more today had he simply put his inheritance in the bank. That demonstrates no financial genius.

Others tell me that the Supreme Court is the real issue. This is the one argument for Trump that has ever impressed me even slightly. But it doesn’t impress me very much. Why not? Because I don’t take him seriously on the subject. 1) First of all, the most he did was to indicate that, should he acquire the White House, he would nominate people “like” those on a list provided to him by the Heritage Foundation. That’s not very strong. 2) When, prior to this presidential campaign, did he ever — ever — demonstrate any real commitment to a conservative position on any significant public issue? (Until remarkably recently, he was a pro-choice Democrat and a contributor to the Clintons.) 3) When has he ever demonstrated any actual commitment to keeping promises? (Ask his wives.) 4) What reason do we have to believe that he would expend significant political capital on an inevitably bruising battle (think of previous instances, such as Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas) to put a conservative justice on the Court? 5) How can we take him seriously on this matter when, by repeatedly attacking the very Republican senators whom he would need in order to confirm his hypothetical conservative nominees — including some senators who are currently fighting for reelection — he’s shown no seriousness himself?

When people tell me (and, lately, scream at me) that, although Trump is bad, Hillary is much worse, I simply don’t see it. Clinton and Trump are just bad in different but overlapping ways. (I like the formulation of the conservative humorist P. J. O’Rourke, who announced many months ago that he was planning to vote for Mrs. Clinton. Why? Because, he said, at least she would be bad “within normal parameters.”)

I honestly can’t choose between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. So I won’t.

I considered simply not voting for the presidency. But that was unsatisfying.

So I’ve turned to voting third party.

I won’t go through all the options, but I’ll mention my serious thought about voting for Gary Johnson. I regard Johnson as something of a flake, and, on some issues (e.g., religious liberty), not much of a libertarian. Still, I would be happy to see the Libertarian Party rise in importance. I believe in a strongly competitive political culture, and I think that Utah is the worse for not having, in most races, vigorous opposition to Republican rule. Any party or politician will grow complacent without continual challenges. But I would be delighted, in Utah, to have the two dominant parties be the Republicans and the Libertarians. That way, the Republicans would be continually drawn rightward, toward free-market solutions and smaller government, rather than in the opposite direction. (I left the Republican Party on the night that Donald Trump accepted the Party’s nomination in Cleveland; currently, I’m an independent, but I’ve flirted with the idea, despite my reservations about portions of its typical platform, of joining the Libertarian Party should the Republicans fail to de-tox themselves after November.)

So I almost decided to vote for Gary Johnson.

In the end, though, I’ve decided to vote for Evan McMullin.

I do so not because he’s a fellow Mormon — I’ve voted mostly for non-Mormons all of my life — but because he has an actual chance (perhaps receding a bit now, but still a possibility) of taking Utah’s six electoral votes. That is a statement that I would dearly love my adopted state to make. While Evangelical Protestants have fallen all over themselves in their eager haste to abandon their principles in support of Mr. Trump, Latter-day Saints have drawn international attention for their reluctance to do so. That has greatly pleased me. And even if, as seems likely, Trump takes Utah, the combined non-Trump vote here will still probably outnumber his supporters. If that’s the outcome, it will be a weaker statement than I would have liked, but I’ll still take it and take pleasure in it.

Some say that we haven’t vetted Evan McMullin, that we know too little about him to elect him president. What leadership experience has he had? Well, who cares? The odds of his actually being elected are microscopic. Besides, there are several people on my block that I would prefer to see as president — seriously, there are — instead of Donald J. Trump and Hillary Rodham Clinton. We know a lot about Clinton and Trump and, personally, the more I know about them, the less I like them. I would support an intelligent person from my neighborhood, someone who knew he or she needed help from competent advisors and who took the job seriously and really wanted to serve, over either of the two major-party nominees. In a heartbeat.

Beyond voting for Evan McMullin, I intend to cast my ballot for Senator Mike Lee, whom I’ve respected over the years for many reasons, including his principled stand against the Republican presidential nominee. (For the record, although I’m more conservative/libertarian than he was, I also liked and admired former Senator Bob Bennett, a very good man.) I’ll also vote for Jason Chaffetz, with whom I generally agree (despite my disappointment at his support for Trump, muted and reluctant as it has been). I’m sorry that I can’t vote for Mia Love, who is evidently in a tight race for reelection. But I don’t live in her district. On the whole, in this distressing and even repulsive election year, it’s urgently important that we conservatives make every effort to maintain Republican control of the House and the Senate. (The odds of the former are good. The chances of the latter are much poorer, alas, in substantial part owing to the self-absorbed and divisive campaign waged by the Republican Party’s horrible presidential nominee.)

I’m grateful to live in a country where we have the opportunity to choose our leaders. I will not break fellowship or cut off friendships with those who view this election differently than I do. While I cannot support Hillary Clinton, I know many good people — members of my church and non-members — who do. I also understand those, including life-long Republicans, who find Donald Trump so toxic that they’re supporting Mrs. Clinton in order to block him from the presidency. I sympathize. And, while I cannot support Donald Trump, I understand those who find Hillary Clinton so objectionable that they’re holding their noses to support Mr. Trump. (I confess to having a much more difficult time understanding those who supported Trump from the start, when there were good alternatives among the Republican candidates.) I hope that our common bonds as citizens of the United States (and, in many cases, as fellow-citizens of the Church and Kingdom of God) will withstand the stresses and strains created by the political passions of this supremely ugly election.

Finally, a word to my fellow Latter-day Saints on “throwing one’s vote away” on a third-party candidate. Some have suggested to me that it’s essentially immoral to do so.

Joseph Smith wouldn’t have agreed.

When none of the leading candidates for the 1844 presidential race — a group that included the titans Henry Clay and John C. Calhoun, as well as the lesser figure, Martin Van Buren, who eventually won — proved satisfactory, Joseph himself launched a campaign for the White House. Did he have any realistic chance of winning? No. He didn’t. The chances of his reaching the White House were extremely low. (And, as it happened, he was martyred before the election took place.)

Andrew Sargent helpfully reminds me of a statement — directly relevant to “throwing votes away” on third-party candidates who probably won’t win — that has been attributed to Joseph Smith himself, although it may actually come from John Taylor or someone else high in Church leadership in Joseph’s day. Certainly its sentiments are consistent with Joseph’s actual undertaking of an independent presidential bid:

“One great reason that we have for pursuing our present course is, that at every election we have been made a political target for the demagogues in the country to shoot their loathsome arrows at. . . . We refuse any longer to be thus bedaubed for either party. We withdraw. Under existing circumstances, we have no other alternative; and if we can accomplish our object, well: if not, we shall have the satisfaction of knowing that we have acted conscientiously, and have used our best judgment. And if we have to throw away our votes, we had better do so upon a worthy rather than an unworthy individual, who might make use of the weapon we put in his hand to destroy us.” (From B. H. Roberts, ed., History of the Church, 2:208-209)

May God bless America.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

November 7, 2016

"World's Heaviest Earthworm Found, Then Killed"

Next Post

November 7, 2016 Thoughts for an ugly time in America

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Jesus do before He fed the crowd?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Washed His hands Dug a hole Gave thanks and broke the bread Called down fire