Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Latter-day Saint
“New Mormon church-owned skyscraper brings high hopes to Salt Lake City”

“New Mormon church-owned skyscraper brings high hopes to Salt Lake City”

Last updated on: September 23, 2016 at 1:53 pm by Dan Peterson

“New Mormon church-owned skyscraper brings high hopes to Salt Lake City” 2016-09-23T13:53:16-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The southern end of Kinnereth or the Sea of Galilee (Wikimedia Commons)

http://www.sltrib.com/news/4386439-155/new-mormon-church-owned-skyscraper-brings-high

The howls of outrage have already commenced, many of them (if not most of them) coming from people who don’t contribute to the Church.

This is a misuse of tithing money, they say. (Actually, it probably doesn’t involve tithing money at all.)

The more rhetorically powerful objection, though, is this: The money should have been given to the poor! Jesus wouldn’t have invested in a high-rise (or in a shopping mall)! Think of the good that these funds could have done among the starving in Africa!

While the wisdom of any particular investment can always be questioned until it actually pays off — stock-pickers on television business shows typically recommend different stocks and fault the recommendations of their onscreen colleagues — objecting to investment in principle strikes me as, very often, unreflective, superficial, and economically misguided. And that’s to the extent that it’s not largely motivated by reflexive anti-Mormon animus that hates everything the Church says, teaches, and does.

A few quick observations:

*

The fundamental issue, it seems to me, is whether the Church should spend all of its income immediately or save and invest some of it. Once it’s decided that, as a matter of responsible stewardship, the Church should save and invest some of its income — as a prudent means, for instance, of preparing for sudden needs, creating a reserve against the inevitable economic downturns that will adversely affect income from tithing and other sources, and growing Church funds for future use — it’s only a question of which investment vehicles to choose. (Recalling, too, that diversification is one of the prime rules of investing.) And there’s no obvious moral superiority, in my judgment, of bank savings accounts or bonds or stocks over real estate.

*

Investing isn’t the same as consuming. Saving (in whatever form, whether it be stocks or bonds or less liquid forms such as real estate) isn’t the same thing as spending.

Those complaining about the Church’s investment at City Creek or in this high-rise building frequently seem to miss the distinction between, say, spending money on a Lamborghini and putting the same amount into a mutual fund. But, again, a mutual fund is really no different, in a fundamental economic sense, than a bond or a rental property. And, whereas money spent on a vacation or on a fancy dinner at Spagos is genuinely gone, money that’s been invested isn’t gone at all. It’s just been saved in a particular form.

At Luke 15:11-32, it’s the Prodigal Son who blows through his inheritance and winds up penniless, destitute, and despairing. Granted, his elder brother eventually comes in for condemnation. But not because that elder brother worked hard and faithfully. And the Prodigal Son’s reckless spending is never commended.

*

Contrary to the assumptions or implications of some critics, it doesn’t appear to be true that Jesus and his apostles gave away all of their money instantly. (Nor is it clear, for that matter, where their money came from.) The gospel of John reports that Judas was in charge of their money bag or box (γλωσσόκομον), which means that they kept a reserve of cash for expenses.

*

Speaking of Judas, John’s gospel portrays him (at 12:1-6) in a way that, viewed in the light of current criticisms of the Church over the City Creek Mall and, now, this high-rise building, is quite striking:

Then Jesus six days before the passover came to Bethany, where Lazarus was which had been dead, whom he raised from the dead.

There they made him a supper; and Martha served: but Lazarus was one of them that sat at the table with him.

Then took Mary a pound of ointment of spikenard, very costly, and anointed the feet of Jesus, and wiped his feet with her hair: and the house was filled with the odour of the ointment.

Then saith one of his disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon’s son, which should betray him,

Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence, and given to the poor?

This he said, not that he cared for the poor; but because he was a thief, and had the bag, and bare what was put therein.

And John 13:27-30 is also interesting in this regard:

And after the sop Satan entered into him. Then said Jesus unto him, That thou doest, do quickly.

Now no man at the table knew for what intent he spake this unto him.

For some of them thought, because Judas had the bag, that Jesus had said unto him, Buy those things that we have need of against the feast; or, that he should give something to the poor.

He then having received the sop went immediately out: and it was night.

It depicts Judas as having enough money for the group that he could give charity from it, and also plainly implies that the money could conceivably be used to buy food for a “feast.”

*

Did Jesus and his disciples “invest” their financial reserves? The New Testament doesn’t say that they did or that they didn’t. But probably not. There were, after all, no banks in the modern sense of the term, and no stock market or bond funds. But would they have had a principled objection to such investment? I see no particular evidence that they would have. And such passages as Matthew 25:14-30 (i.e., the Parable of the Talents) might seem to argue for investing.

*

The Church has a real interest in keeping the downtown area around its headquarters and around Temple Square and the Conference Center and the Church museums clean and attractive, both out of respect to the sacredness and historical significance of some of those places and out of a desire to provide a welcoming and impressive venue for the many tourists and others who come to the area every year. (Temple Square typically draws between three and five million visitors annually, which is more than all five of Utah’s National Parks — Zion, Bryce, Canyonlands, Arches, and Capitol Reef — combined.)

Inner cities in many American metropolitan centers have been seriously decaying for at least two or three generations, even despite massive outlays of federal “urban renewal” funds. Downtown Salt Lake City is not decaying. That’s a good thing.

*

The Church is sometimes derided as a net drain on Utah’s economy, because the tithes of Church members are often used to fund chapels and temples and missionaries in far distant places. It’s ironic, in this and similar cases, to see it derided for massive contributions to Utah’s economy. This building, for example, represents a major investment that employed large numbers of construction workers, that will provide jobs for a sizable group of ongoing employees, and that will (and probably already has) attract tenants (some from out of state) who will pay well for the privilege of acquiring space at this excellent facility at this excellent address.

*

I suspect that the “city set on a hill” at Matthew 5:14 is an allusion to the hilltop town of Sepphoris in the Galilee. It was a booming new area during Jesus’ lifetime, still being constructed, and it was within walking distance of Nazareth. The town of Nazareth itself was too small, probably, to sustain a “builder” (tekton) like Joseph. (There’s little wood in Palestine; he almost certainly wasn’t a carpenter.) But Sepphoris offered plenty of employment, and the young Jesus may well have walked over with him and helped. References in the New Testament to corner stones and to building houses on rock rather than sand and so forth suggest some possible background, on the part of Jesus, with stonemasonry. Which would mean that Jesus was, with his father and before his ministry, something like a modern building contractor, and that he may well have been involved with the construction of what were, by the standards of his day and place, some rather luxurious buildings.

*

The common image of Peter and the other apostles as penniless Galilean peasants is very likely wrong. The sons of Zebedee, for example, seem to have owned several boats and perhaps to have employed others in their fishing enterprise. Moreover, fishing at Capernaum wasn’t merely a subsistence-level activity; it was an export business, shipping dried fish from nearby Magdala to Tiberias and, via the Wadi Hammam, up to Nazareth and even beyond. And the ruins at Capernaum that are commonly identified as those of Peter’s house — an identification that I find plausible — seem to suggest that, by the standards of his time and place, he was reasonably successful, perhaps of the Galilean Jewish “middle class.”

The romanticizing of early Christian poverty appears to have little basis in actual historical fact.

*

I, for one, am glad that the Church is administered by good people who, in many cases, have considerable business experience and financial savvy. That reassures me that what they do is likely to be competent, as well as well-intentioned — and that, thereby, it will maximize the good, over the long term, that the Church can do. The Lord’s admonition at Matthew 10:16 (admittedly, to our ears, rather strangely expressed) is not only to be “harmless as doves” but “wise as serpents.”

Uncategorized

Previous Post

September 23, 2016

"Muslim. Black. Women."

Next Post

September 23, 2016 "Assessing the Joseph Smith Papyri: An Introduction to the Historiography of their Acquisitions, Translations, and Interpretations"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In 1 Peter 1, what does Peter say is more valuable than gold?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Wisdom Righteousness Charity Faith