My brief remarks from tonight’s program

Last updated on: April 6, 2016 at 10:38 pm by Dan Peterson

My brief remarks from tonight’s program 2016-04-06T22:38:25-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

One last opportunity to run this!

Here is the introduction that I gave tonight at the beginning of the program on “Editing Out the ‘Bad Grammar’ in the Book of Mormon” that was held at Brigham Young University:

We are here tonight to mark publication of the latest products of the Book of Mormon Critical Text Project: The impressively massive and elegantly produced Parts One and Two of Volume Three (The History of the Text of the Book of Mormon: Grammatical Variation).

The central task of the Book of Mormon Critical Text Project has always been, to the extent possible, to restore the original English text of the Book of Mormon by scholarly means.

To that end, the Project has already produced

Volume One: The Original Manuscript

Volume Two (in two parts): The Printer’s Manuscript

Volume Four (in six parts): Analysis of Textual Variants

It has also produced the beautiful and very readable volume that, with others, I call “the Yale edition,” which is officially entitled The Book of Mormon: The Earliest Text and which was published by Yale University Press in 2009. I consider this book so important that, if I had my wish, at least one copy of it would be in the home of every Latter-day Saint who reads English.

I’ve described these books as beautiful and elegant, and it’s appropriate here to pay brief tribute to the excellent work of the national-award-winning typographer Jonathan Salzman, who has made them so. I take special personal pleasure in commending him because, during the time that I was privileged to be involved with them, he was also a principal contributor to the beauty and elegance of the Islamic Translation Series and the Middle Eastern Texts Initiative that I conceived and founded here at BYU.

Royal Skousen is a professor in the Department of Linguistics and English Language at BYU, where he founded the Book of Mormon Critical Text Project in 1988 and has led it ever since. He has, thus, established an entirely justified reputation as, by many light years, the leading expert on the textual history of the Book of Mormon. He has been tenacious, meticulous, and radically honest in this work, setting a scholarly standard that, in my experience, is rarely approached, in or out of the Church. And, although this is less appreciated among his Latter-day Saint audience, he is also internationally known as the founder of the analogical modeling approach to linguistics.

Royal Skousen received a bachelor’s degree from BYU in English, with a minor in mathematics, followed by a doctorate in linguistics from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He taught at the University of Texas at Austin before joining the BYU faculty. Since then, he’s served as a visiting professor at the University of California, San Diego; a Fulbright lecturer at the University of Tampere in Finland; and a research fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics in Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Royal and his wife Sirkku—an invaluable help to him who has been perfectly meet for him—have been treasured friends to me and my wife for many years now.

Stanford Carmack is an independent scholar based in Cape Cod, Massachusetts. He earned a bachelor’s degree in linguistics from Stanford University, followed by a law degree from that same institution. He also holds a Ph.D. in Hispanic Languages and Literature from the University of California, Santa Barbara, where he specialized in historical syntax. He has published articles on such topics as Georgian verb morphology and object–participle agreement in Old Spanish and Old Catalan.

Dr. Carmack is currently researching Book of Mormon syntax as it relates to Early Modern English. By my count, he has now published eight articles related to that subject in Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture, and he is a major contributor, by means of textual analysis, to the ongoing work that appears in volume 3 of the Book of Mormon critical text project—which, in a sense, we’re celebrating tonight.

I still clearly recall the first time that I heard from, or of, Stan Carmack. He contacted me on 19 March 2014—just slightly more than two years ago—about a substantial paper that he had written on, as he put it, “aspects of Early Modern English language in the Book of Mormon.” When I actually saw the paper, I was stunned. Here was a second highly qualified linguist who—independently, and coming from a somewhat different angle—was beginning to see the language of the English Book of Mormon in the same intriguing (and puzzling) way that Royal Skousen was. I passed that paper on to Royal for his opinion on it—Royal and Stan can correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think that they’d been in serious contact before that point—and . . . well, the rest, in my view, is historic.

I respect them because of their willingness to follow the data where it leads, however surprising that may be, whatever their own preconceptions might be, whatever the preconceptions of those around them, and no matter how much some may misunderstand and even caricature what they’re saying. Once again, what I’ve called the “fierce integrity” of this project deeply impresses me.

I look forward to what they have to say this evening.

Professor Skousen’s remarks will last for a total of about forty-five minutes. Midway through them, however, he will pause. Dr. Carmack will present his paper at that point. It will last for roughly thirty-five minutes. Professor Skousen will then resume his remarks, and a question-and-answer period will follow thereafter.

Brethren?

Tonight’s program was videotaped, and it will eventually be posted on a website belonging to Book of Mormon Central and on the website of the Interpreter Foundation.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

April 6, 2016

Ten quotations from the late Justice Scalia, who is missed

Next Post

April 6, 2016 BOM Mosiah 24

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Psalm is quoted by Jesus on the cross, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?"

Select your answer to see how you score.

Psalm 2 Psalm 137 Psalm 34 Psalm 22