Honoring a historic breakthrough in the study of Internet Anti-Mormonism

Last updated on: April 21, 2016 at 1:00 pm by Dan Peterson

Honoring a historic breakthrough in the study of Internet Anti-Mormonism 2016-04-21T13:00:24-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Two Russian scientists collecting anti-Mormon spoors in Novaya Zemlya
(Wikimedia Commons)

Many years ago, when we had far less data than we have now, a pioneering student of apostasy in the Internet Age formulated what has come to be called, in his honor, Novak’s Rule. It runs essentially as follows:

When you become an apostate, expect your IQ to drop by about eighty points. In other words, God strikes you stupid.

Now, as formulated, the Rule is obviously too simple. As with all illnesses, the incidence of Novak’s Disease is unpredictable. Just as not every smoker contracts lung cancer, not all sedentary red-meat addicts develop coronary problems, and not everybody exposed to the flu becomes sick, many apostates – probably, in fact, a considerable majority of them — continue to show signs of relatively normal mental function.

Moreover, one might accuse the formulator of Novak’s Rule of invoking a “God of the Gaps” argument: There is no evidence that it’s actually God, whether directly or indirectly, who lowers certain apostate IQs. It’s entirely possible that an entirely naturalistic explanation will be found for the phenomenon. Just as, now that we understand the mechanism behind lunar eclipses and the origin of meteors, we no longer call upon supernatural forces to explain them, the discernible trajectory of post-Newtonian science suggests that Novak’s Disease, as well, should first be explained in ordinary, natural terms. (This would reflect the helpful principle called “methodological naturalism.”) Only when and if such natural analysis proves inadequate to the task should supernatural agents be hypothesized. (This advice reflects yet another important rule: William of Ockham’s.)

But there is a more fundamental objection to Novak’s Rule, and I think it’s a legitimate one: No direct measurements of post-apostasy IQs have been taken, such that they might be compared to pre-apostasy IQs in the same test subjects.

Strictly speaking, therefore, we don’t know that apostate IQs have actually dropped from their previous (believing) levels. Further, human experimentation is notoriously difficult, fraught with both legal and ethical challenges – and this is so even before we confront the often irrationally belligerent objects of our research themselves. (Fortunately, they needn’t be tranquilized, wrestled to the ground, and tagged for observation. Most of them have already clearly tagged themselves.)

All we’re left with, as matters currently stand, is inference from the public, outward behavior of a statistically significant number of apostates.

But this seems to be enough.

I was forcibly reminded of Novak’s Rule this morning, as I browsed a few anti-Mormon threads on various sites – threads that happen to focus, as they frequently do, on y’r humble and obdt servant. Many such threads are devoted to the ever-fascinating topic of my remarkable insignificance. (I’m reminded of one of Yogi Berra’s famous comments: “Nobody goes there any more. It’s too crowded.”) But others take me to task for the various screamingly stupid and bloodcurdlingly offensive things that I say and do many times throughout each typical day.

It’s not merely that they routinely rip things out of context, often omitting materially relevant statements and facts without ellipses, and that they grievously, tendentiously, maliciously, but still perhaps unconsciously distort the meaning of what’s left. They also commit errors of logic — particularly, non sequiturs and fallacies of poisoning the well — that would make an unprincipled sophist blush.

For all that it might be made more rigorous and precise, the formulator of Novak’s Rule remains an honored trailblazer in the study of the intriguing phenomenon called “Internet Anti-Mormonism.” The Rule has proven its value.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

April 21, 2016

"Professor David Holland, Associate Professor of North American Religious History"

Next Post

April 21, 2016 "How should Muslim parents and teachers talk to children about Donald Trump?"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the primary conflict resolution method in Biblical times?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Sword fight Elder council Public debate Lottery