Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Latter-day Saint
Elder Ballard’s supposed anti-Catholic bigotry

Elder Ballard’s supposed anti-Catholic bigotry

Last updated on: October 24, 2015 at 1:01 pm by Dan Peterson

Elder Ballard’s supposed anti-Catholic bigotry 2015-10-24T13:01:49-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

My beloved teacher, Father Georges Anawati OP (1905-1994), with Pope Saint John Paul II
(Click to enlarge; click again to enlarge further.)

You may or may not have noticed the very recent tempest — there’s always a tempest, but its focus constantly changes — concerning a brief, passing, unscripted remark made during February 2014 by Elder M. Russell Ballard of the Council of Twelve in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Referring to Catholics, he remarked before a local group of Latter-day Saints that “they don’t know who God is. They don’t know who the Savior is; nor do they know who the Holy Ghost is.”

For a critical reaction to his remark that isn’t rendered basically unreadable by deep and unreasoning hostility — the same can’t be said, unfortunately, for all of the comments posted in response — see Jana Riess’s blogged reply here.

Elder Ballard is being pilloried in certain predictable quarters as a bigot, an out-of-touch throwback to the supposedly bad old days of Mormonism, full of hate, and so forth. He’s portrayed as having “denounced” Catholicism. Even more moderate quarters, though, have expressed regret. And some have voiced the confident hope that a more-univeralist, less exclusive Church is on the horizon, and that that glorious dawn will arrive once the current generation finally exits the scene.

To the last, I’ll simply say, in passing, that a non-exclusivist Mormonism would be unrecognizable as Mormonism. Joseph Smith’s claim of Restoration would be both pointless and incomprehensible without the implication of an apostasy. Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery’s reception of Aaronic and Melchizedek priesthood authority would be redundant if other claims to such authority were deemed valid.

Instead, I would like to very briefly address the regret that some commenters have voiced. (I know that little can be done to win over those who want to portray Elder Ballard as a hateful anti-Catholic bigot, which I’m entirely confident that he’s not. But perhaps I can help a little bit even there, if somebody is willing to listen.)

The critics should perhaps dial it back a bit, and consider the principle of charity in reading others.

Elder Ballard was presumably speaking more or less off the cuff, as Latter-day Saint speakers and especially Latter-day Saint leaders commonly do on such occasions. Had he been speaking from a carefully prepared text, he might have nuanced his remark more, or differently. He can certainly clarify it and/or defend himself, if he chooses to do so. (Perhaps he already has, and I’ve missed it.) But what he said doesn’t seem to me untrue (from a standard-issue, mainstream Mormon viewpoint) nor even remotely novel.

Some have purported to summarize what Elder Ballard said by representing him as declaring that Catholics don’t know God.

Well, in an important respect, that’s certainly true: They don’t. None of us does. Not fully. Not adequately. Not as completely as, someday, we hope to know him. “For now we see through a glass, darkly,” wrote even the great Apostle Paul at 1 Corinthians 13:12, “but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.”

But Elder Ballard wasn’t referring to that. He was plainly suggesting that Latter-day Saints know who God is in a way that Catholics don’t.

Please notice, though, the way in which I formulated that: I spoke of knowing who God is, not of knowing God. There is, to my mind, a clear significant difference between the two modes of expression. And it’s significant that Elder Ballard, too, used the first, not the second.

Lots and lots of stories tell of princes in disguise, and similar things. Clearly, it’s possible to know a person and not to know who that person is — at least, not fully. There are, for example, accounts of kids going door to door singing Christmas carols in Princeton, New Jersey. At one house, the long-haired old man who answers the door tells them to wait for just a minute, goes and fetches his violin, and then accompanies them on several carols. Did all of them realize that he was named Albert Einstein, and that he was among the greatest scientific thinkers in history? Did the people who went to that nightclub on Colorado Boulevard in Pasadena and heard the guy playing the drums there know that the drummer, Richard Feynman, was a professor at Caltech, a Nobel laureate in physics, and one of the foremost authorities in the world on quantum theory? The peasant girl might know her young suitor very well and love him dearly, but she may not realize that he’s the heir to the throne.

Elder Ballard seemed to be saying, simply, that Catholics are theologically wrong about God in several respects. That they misunderstand precisely who he is.

There’s nothing whatever new in this. Catholics and Mormons disagree about the nature of the Godhead in dramatic ways. Mormons believe God to be embodied. Catholics don’t. Catholics believe in Nicene ontological trinitarianism. Mormons don’t. Mormons believe humanity to be genetically related to God, as it were, in a very literal way that Catholics don’t. Catholic theologians often speak of God as the Unmoved Mover; Mormons don’t. And so forth.

Catholicism is precisely as far from Mormonism on such points as Mormonism is from Catholicism, and it would be disingenuous to pretend otherwise.

I suspect that Elder Ballard didn’t mean a whole lot more than that in the two sentences that have so inflamed some critics.

Jana Riess, speaking up against what she sees as a rather total devaluation of Catholicism by Elder Ballard — a devaluation that I simply don’t see in his comments — tells of how much certain Catholic music has meant to her, as well as certain other things Catholic, including the writing of Thomas Merton.

I don’t take a back seat to her in that regard. I hope that my respect for Catholicism has been evident over the years, here on this blog, in various newspaper columns, in other things I’ve written, and in many public lectures and firesides that I’ve delivered.

I read Thomas Merton while still in high school.

I’ve met with very high Catholic leaders at the Vatican and elsewhere — one of them even invited me and some friends, as his guests, to attend a function with Pope John Paul II at the Roman Basilica of St. Paul Outside-the-Walls — and I respect them enormously.

In September 2006, while I was on a lecture tour in Australia and New Zealand that was focused on Islam, Pope Benedict XVI gave a lecture at the University of Regensburg, in Germany. Some of his remarks struck both Muslim and non-Muslim observers as bigoted toward Islam, and an international controversy ensued. I soon found myself being asked to respond to him both in lectures and during several radio interviews. Unlike Elder Ballard’s comment, the Pope’s speech was written out, and I managed to find a copy of the German original online. And, although I’m both a Mormon and an Islamicist, I was perfectly happy and willing to defend him, on multiple occasions in both countries, against what I regarded as gross and inflammatory misinterpretations.

I, too, love much Catholic music. (Singing Schubert’s Mass in G with a choir in Cairo, for example, remains, for my wife and for me, one of the musical — and spiritual — high points of our lives; I’ve written about it several times.)

I studied one-on-one for several months with Father Georges Anawati at the Institut Dominicain d’Etudes Orientales in Cairo, and, like most everyone else who knew him, loved him.

One of my sons is named after St. Thomas Aquinas.

I’ve drawn considerably from Catholic liberation theologians for my thinking about Mormonism and social trinitarianism (some of which will shortly appear in Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture).

I don’t consider it even remotely “bigoted” or “hateful” or “denunciatory” to acknowledge that, from the standpoint of Mormonism, Catholicism gets some things quite wrong about “who God is,” “who the Savior is,” and “who the Holy Ghost is.” And I fully expect that informed, believing Catholics will sometimes do us the credit of frankly saying precisely the same thing about Latter-day Saints.

Posted from San Francisco, California

Uncategorized

Previous Post

October 24, 2015

New Testament 276

Next Post

October 24, 2015 Esse quam videri

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "If anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

John Peter Paul James