Opposing Church leadership at the next General Conference

Last updated on: March 6, 2015 at 6:52 pm by Dan Peterson

Opposing Church leadership at the next General Conference 2015-03-06T18:52:43-07:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The interior of the Conference Center in Salt Lake City
(Click to enlarge.)

My friend Michael De Groote calls my attention to a plan to oppose the leadership of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints at the Church’s upcoming annual General Conference.

Calling themselves “a group of concerned members” of the Church, its organizers seek “to express feedback, opinions, dissent, or dissatisfaction about the current views, positions and teachings of the LDS Church.”

The leadership of the Church, they claim, are “insulated from hearing authentic concerns and feedback of their members.”

For the record, I think this complaint misconceived. Leaders of the Church come from the general membership — they’re not, say, a professional celibate elite — and aren’t, for the most part, very long removed from it. They live in ordinary neighborhoods, not in monasteries or convents. They have spouses, children, grandchildren, and friends. Moreover, as part of their calling, they’re almost constantly on the road, meeting with local members, leaders, and missionaries.

Of course, communication can always be improved.

But one comment from the group is, to me, very revealing: “Typically members must be in good standing and enjoy certain levels of trust with their priesthood leaders before a request for tickets [to General Conference] will be granted. As such, it is often difficult for individuals who wish to express concerns to secure Conference tickets.”

That, I think, speaks volumes.

Implicitly, the people they’re seeking to recruit for their protest are, to some substantial degree, those who aren’t in good standing in the Church and who don’t have the trust of their local Church leaders.

It’s always possible to gain admittance to General Conference if one is willing to wait in a standby line. Probably most Conference attendees do precisely that. But these folks would prefer higher numbers and easier access than that method would guarantee.

Accordingly, the group has issued a “call for action.” They’re asking members and local leaders of the Church who might have control over tickets to General Conference, or who might be able to secure them, to give them not to faithful Latter-day Saints in good standing who seek to enjoy the Conference sessions but, rather, to the group itself, for distribution to dissidents. They encourage “Latter-day Saints who wish to cast a dissenting vote but do not have access to Conference tickets . . . to request tickets” from their leaders in order to stage a protest there. They also urge dissidents unable to obtain tickets to arrive at the stand-by line early, so as to ensure that they, rather than believing Mormons who support the General Authorities, will gain access to General Conference.

To their credit, the organizers of this protest add that “Participants are to be aware that that this is a peaceful vote and not a disruption of General Conference. Participants are encouraged to dress and behave respectfully due to the sacredness and decorum of the Conference setting. Any indication of violent or malicious intent will be reported to law enforcement authorities.”

However, they also indicate that they “will remain anonymous in the attempt to prevent LDS leadership from singling out and preventing specific individuals from participation,” and in the hope of avoiding “reprisal.”

Posted from Monterey, California

Uncategorized

Previous Post

March 6, 2015

"Reflections of 'Urim': Hebrew Poetry Sheds Light on the Directors/Interpreters Mystery"

Next Post

March 6, 2015 On the tax proposal recently unveiled by Sen. Mike Lee and Sen. Marco Rubio

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did the biblical measurement of a cubit represent?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Length of forearm Length of foot Length of hand Length of leg