Tricycle‘s Max Zahn Responds to Arthur Brooks’ Wily New York Times Op-Ed about the Dalai Lama

Last updated on: April 26, 2014 at 2:56 pm by dannyfisher

Tricycle‘s Max Zahn Responds to Arthur Brooks’ Wily New York Times Op-Ed about the Dalai Lama 2014-04-26T14:56:39-07:00 dannyfisher

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

‘His Holiness the Dalai Lama and AEI President Arthur Brooks during their discussion on ‘Happiness, Free Enterprise and Human Flourishing’ at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington DC on February 19, 2014.” Photo by Patrick G. Ryan

I had a lot of thoughts about Arthur Brooks’ recent op-ed in the pages of the New York Times about His Holiness the Dalai Lama’s recent visit to his free market think-tank the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). Fortunately, Tricycle: The Buddhist Review‘s editorial assistant Max Zahn had some too, and composed his more eloquently and helpfully than I would have been able to do with mine. It’s an awesome piece.

Here’s a snippet:

By reducing Washington politics to a series of petty conflicts between stubborn individuals, Brooks avoids outlining the contours of his own ideology. He disguises free market capitalism as a natural way of being—as the proverbial invisible hand devoid of first principles, which stands in contrast with the fraught ideological morass of Washington. In so doing, he does not have to address the concentration of wealth and influence, which inevitably rise up from an unregulated market to clog national politics. Finding himself in a less-than-robust post-recession era of capitalism that features historic levels of inequality and the steady degradation of the planet, Brooks does what many of his market-beholden counterparts on Wall Street have done: he plays dumb.

This sleight of hand should come as no surprise from an adept salesman like Brooks. The shocking kicker, though, is that Brooks appropriates the Dalai Lama and Buddhism as New Age window dressing. It’s a libertarian politics perfectly crafted for our happiness-obsessed cultural moment. Paraphrasing the Dalai Lama, Brooks celebrates his assertion that “the secret to human flourishing is the development of every individual.” To buttress the point, he quotes a statement from His Holiness at AEI’s panel, during which the monk wondered, “Where does a happy world start? From government? No. From United Nations? No. From individual.” It takes only a short inferential leap to link Buddhism and free market capitalism at the nexus of personal responsibility. Dragging Buddhism across that divide, Brooks presents a Western flavor of the religion that deemphasizes sangha and hallows self-improvement.

I recommend that you read Max’s whole post, and you can do that here.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

April 26, 2014

Ajahn Sujato: "I Think We're Doomed"

Next Post

April 26, 2014 Don't Miss Inquiring Mind's Special, Spring 2014 Issue on "War and Peace"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2015 December 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Paul tell the Philippians to rejoice in always?

Select your answer to see how you score.

God's goodness The Lord Their salvation All circumstances