Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Danielle Kingstrom

Classification Confusion: Labels are Meant to Divide

Last updated on: July 21, 2019 at 7:32 pm   by Danielle Kingstrom

Classification Confusion: Labels are Meant to Divide 2019-07-21T19:32:33-06:00 Danielle Kingstrom

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Photo by Marija Zaric on Unsplash

The classification confusion that is permeating our society is creating a general identity crisis for all. Labels are meant to divide and so long as we cling to our categories, so long as we justify the use of labels, we will never bear witness to the kind of equality that resembles Kingdom unity.

Whether you identify as black, brown, or white—it’s just a label.
Whether you call yourself “antiracist”, a “recovering racist” or call someone else a “racist”—it’s still just a label.

Liberal, Progressive, or Conservative; Democrat, Republican, Independent, Libertarian, or even Anarchist—all still labels.

Man, woman, or other—another label. Heterosexual or pansexual; he, she, or they—just labels.

People will argue for their labels. People will say that labels matter. That we need labels to discern, to categorize, to judge, to identify. Sure. We need to identify objects. We need to categorize ideas.

But the truth is, no matter what label we affix to our names, or to our identities, we are all people first. Humans, to be exact. Humans that, for the majority of my audience, also believe in God. Even some will call themselves “believers” in order to distinguish themselves from others.

An even deeper truth is that we use these labels as a way to stay disconnected.

We use labels to judge others not in a discerning matter, not in a way to categorize, but so that we can demonize and dehumanize other people. Labels are exclusionary by definition. And whether we are willing to admit that or not, we use labels to exclude, intentionally. But how often do we use labels to include? I would argue not nearly as much as we do so to demonstrate why we are better-than others.

There’s a great fear that grows when one sees a potential to understand the other. Understanding another requires a connection. If we become comfortable staying disconnected, that means actual connection seems uncomfortable. That which is new to us will feel like an invasion. How odd is it that we find more comfort in disconnection than connection?

Does it have anything to do with how we use the terms “label” and “identity”? Perhaps.

Definitions

According to Merriam-Webster’s definition, the term label means:

Further searches provide the following definitions:

Not only is the term “label” exclusionary, it is also typically applied to persons or things inaccurately.

But most of us don’t use the term in the negative when we apply it to ourselves, and those who understand the inaccurate and restrictive nature of the term simply opt for a synonym of the word. Such as: identify, identity, and align.

If you flip through the pages of Roget’s International Thesaurus, like I did, you will happen upon some curious variations of the terms identify and identity.

We use these terms every day in a variety of applications. We use them to indicate, characterize, mark, recognize, distinguish, order, name, classify, pigeonhole, sort, group, grade, and even to order in a chain of being, as in a domain realm or kingdom. We also use the terms identity and identify to divide.

So, essentially, depending upon what we are addressing, we interchangeably use the same word to mean many, many different things. Is it any wonder we are seeing our society struggle to communicate?

I know that many would say that this is how our lexicon works. I understand that. And I won’t argue against that.

What I want to focus on is why labels, identifications, and identities are problematic and divisive.

Identity in Christ

The one identity that I believe matters more than anything is the one that makes us all One. The human identity—the one identity that we all share, that which defines out sameness, our homogeneity. The only one that God called not good, but very good. Genesis 1:27, 31:

So God created [hu]mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them…
God saw all that he had made, and it was very good.

God establishes for us, the standard of what is very good—humankind, people. People are good. Which means, for me at least, that we were created to be good, inherently good. God is the Great Gardener that plants the seed of the goodness in each of us. We all grow under the same sun. We are all watered by God’s great rains. We breath the same air. We bleed the same red blood. We are all covered in flesh. We have two eyes, two ears, and one mouth. This is what unifies us. This is what correlates us to one another. This is how we are equal. We are equally very good.

God also made a startling realization. God, in God’s perfect wholeness, created but one man, so Genesis proclaims. But that was “not good”. Genesis 2:18:

The Lord God said, ‘It is not good for the man to be alone.’

Thus, from the rib of the man, woman was created.

Now, we could quibble on and on about the interpretation of Genesis and whether or not one is taking the reading literally. That is not my concern. The point I wish to highlight is that what was deemed “not good” was being alone. What God deemed “very good,” people.

God established the only categorization, label, or identification that was worthy of being recognized. If we are a people that are attempting to be more like God—to be more Christ-like, to be more like Jesus—then we should see that the only way we really need to identify ourselves is the way in which God already identified us. As very good, as God’s children.

God provided the only chain of being that was necessary for this domain realm. Our being is stratified by Kingdom nomenclature. Yet we still grasp for the sorting of social hierarchies and race divisions. We yearn for the status we feel from the definitions of the powers and principalities that work to divide us and confuse us.

Paul reminds us that nothing can separate us from the love of God— Romans 8:35,37-39:

Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall trouble or hardship or persecution or famine or nakedness or danger or sword?
…No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, neither in height or depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Yet, we work so hard to separate ourselves from the love of God—the love of God that is in all of us. That’s the inherent goodness, that’s what makes us “very good”. God’s love. When we search for ways to distinguish ourselves from other people, we are effectively looking for ways to separate ourselves from God and God’s love.

God shows us how we are all connected and we seek ways to disconnect from all.

Labels insist that we draw a line, a distinction. We draw a line between the congruity of humanity. We draw a line between very good and good enough to be aligned on my side. God provided the no-difference definition for humanity and humanity demanded that we differentiate.

The nomenclature of the Kingdom states that we are to be known as God’s children. Why do we reject such sameness? What is it that is so alluring about distinguishing ourselves from one another? Who benefits from such divisions and such simplistic ways of sorting and grading humans?

My conclusion leads me to believe that, while we find value in categorizing ourselves, we also create a deficit for humanity. We create more problems, essentially.

We brand each other with labels such as: racist, anti-choice, anti-life, bigot, homophobe, Islamaphobe, xenophobe, sexist, etc. We do this so that we can let others know what we believe certain people should be known as.

The dishonest part of it all is that we do so without ever really knowing who they are. We do so without ever really connecting with them. We do this to remain disconnected, because, let’s be honest, who wants any kind of a connection with a racist, right? But if you truly believe that the labels you are willing to attach to collectives are true, why aren’t you doing anything to stop the assignment of labels? Is it because if we had no one to label, we would have no one to blame?

 

 

 Recorded Conversations has debuted. Subscribe and stay up to date on all of the conversations.

 

Uncategorized

brand

Categorization

Characterization

distinction

distinguish

Division

Identify

identity

know

labels

mark

order

place

recognize

Separation

to be known as

About Danielle Kingstrom

Danielle Kingstrom is a writer, podcaster, and leg-warmer aficionado. She is the host of "Recorded Conversations", a podcast dedicated to compassionately considering all perspectives while engaging in connected dialogues about societal issues. Current work includes an upcoming book, "Enfleshed: Making Monogamous Relationships Real". You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post



July 18, 2019

Life Sucks: Stop Comparing Suffering!

Next Post



July 23, 2019 Self-Emptying: Erotic Kenosis and Monogamous Relationships


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Authentic Connection Ego Love Self Suffering Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the primary light source in Biblical times?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Bonfire Candle Torch Oil lamp

Related posts from Danielle Kingstrom

Progressive Christian

Are We Sacrificing Liberty & Freedom for the...

Danielle Kingstrom

Progressive Christian

Is Fear the Great Motivator?

Danielle Kingstrom

Progressive Christian

Do Christians Make an Idol out of Jesus?

Danielle Kingstrom

Progressive Christian

Hey Girl, Can I Tell You Something?

Danielle Kingstrom

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Why Christians Have a Sacred Duty to Vote:...

The Bible offers strong support for the sacred duty to vote. Here...

What Being a Modern-Day Apostle Means to Me

In my last column, I discussed the ins and outs of modern-day...

Did Ancient China Once Worship the God of...

Across human history, a common thread weaves through the origins of the...

Love Your Neighbor – Including Earth-Kin: Lev. 19,...

God’s command to love your neighbor means acting in an ethical and...

Lead a Church Study of “Jesus and Lao...

Guest writer Jack Thomas (The Irreverent Reverend) reflects on leading his church...

Principles for Understanding the Apostolic Ministry Today

Whenever people discover that my formal ministry title is "apostle," as in...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube