Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Daffey Thoughts

The Healthcare debate

Last updated on: March 29, 2017 at 10:31 am   by Dave Griffey

The Healthcare debate 2017-03-29T07:34:33-04:00 Dave Griffey

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I typically don’t wade into this one because, to be honest, I have no idea what the solution is.  The United States is unlike any other nation.  The third largest population on earth.  A wildly diverse citizenry from scores of backgrounds.  A Democratic Republic established on the cooperation of individual states for common cause. A strong emphasis on liberty and freedom.

However we fix the healthcare problem, I’m sure it won’t look like any other country’s solution.  Likewise, when the day comes that we do cease to be the nation we were, when we collapse you might say, I’m sure it won’t look like any other civilization’s collapse either. But that’s for a different post.

Healthcare.  I’m no expert.  But the problem isn’t our healthcare system itself.  We have relatively good healthcare.  So far at least, we’re where people from around the world come to be treated.  Even our good neighbors up north have been known to vacation in the US for the odd medical procedure.  So it’s not the actual healthcare that is the problem.

It’s not necessarily accessibility.  Though reports that you are guaranteed a right to treatment no matter what are greatly exaggerated.  It’s true that no hospital can turn you away in an emergency.  That doesn’t mean hospitals, or private practitioners, are obliged to take you in as a patient and set up routine treatments.  In fact, the problem there is that they are only obliged to take care of you after the emergency has happened.  And by then, it’s either too late or going to be crazy expensive.

Which leads to the problem.  The problem is the cost.  The out of pocket cost to the individual.  Obamacare really didn’t solve that as much as it transferred the problem to the government.  The out of pocket costs were still based on what quality of package you chose which, of course, was based on how much you were willing to pay.  And that’s the problem, whether it’s the private sector or the government.

By out of pocket, I mean of course the money you yourself pay out for a procedure.  Whether going to the doctor, getting a test done at an outpatient facility, going to the ER, whatever.  It also means, if you want, the premiums, or the price, that you pay to have the plan in the first place.  Plans come usually in two basic forms: plans through a company you work for, and plans you can buy on your own.

In most cases, companies that offer a plan will pay for part of the premium, while you pay for the other.  Often the premiums are a little better through a company, as is the coverage you get, since it follows the ‘bulk purchase’ philosophy of less for each unit the more you buy.  Buying individual plans outside of your employer will typically cost more for coverage that is not nearly as good.  Sometimes the cost can be close to double, or even more, the cost compared to cost through a company.   This doesn’t get into issues like pre-existing conditions, which were taken care of by the ACA.

Then you have the real kickers that have become the big issue.  The coinsurance and deductibles.  While there are still some plans out there that follow the old PPO or HMO model of copays with 100% coverage afterward, more and more are going back to the coinsurance model.  The difference is how much you will pay from your own bank account.  Copays were nice, you paid X amount up front, say $10.00 at a doctor’s office, or $50.00 at an ER.  Insurance paid everything else.

Coinsurance, on the other hand, usually has you pay a certain percentage of every procedure.  So instead of $10.00 at the doctor’s office, you pay 20% of the bill.  If the total cost of the visit is $100.00, under the copay you will pay $10.00.  If the doctor’s visit, owing to this or that test or blood work, ends up being $200.00, you still pay $10.00.  Under coinsurance, however, you would pay $20.00 in the first example, a whopping $40.00 in the second.

And when you get into hospital stays or ER visits, or certain tests like colonoscopies or X-Rays or MRIs, that can make a huge difference.  Some basic visits to the hospital can run $4000.00 to $6,000.00 just for getting a ten minute test.  Actually being admitted?  It can run into the tens of thousands.  And 20% (which is most coinsurance rates, though a minority will have 10% for the patient responsibility) will run you high amounts quickly if the total hospital stay is, say, $16,000.00.  That’s you owing $3,200.00 for the mathematically challenged.

Now, most insurance companies will have an ‘Out of Pocket Max’.  That is, you won’t have to pay more than X in a year.  Usually that is linked to the deductible amount.  The deductible?  You know what that is.  That’s how much you have to pay straight up before the coinsurance (and in some cases and plans, the coverage from copay plans as well) kicks in.  As recently as the late 90s, most deductibles were around $500.00.  Some were $200.00.  Sometimes $100.00.  On rare occasion, the really bad plans could be upwards of $1000.00.

Today, the typical deducible is around $2500.00.  $5000.00 deductibles are not unheard of.  I’ve heard some cases of $10,000.00 deductibles for catastrophic level coverage.  That is, you would have to pay $5000.00 or even $10,000.00 out of your own bank account, your own wallet so to speak, before the first brass farthing from the insurance kicked in.  And then, if you have coinsurance, the company will still only pay 80% of the remaining cost. You’ll pay the other 20%.

So, to an example.  You have a family of 4 let’s say.  You have a plan that has $3,500 per person deductible at 80/20 coinsurance.  Being a $3,500.00 deductible, you’ll likely have an out of pocket maximum of around $6,000.00 to $7,000.00 per person.  That’s how much – in each year – you’ll have to spend yourself.  Per person.  It costs you $200.00 month to have, because you get it through your employer.  It could be double or triple that for private care, but let’s keep it through your employer.  It may have an option for a free well check every year, or in some cases, will have a $10.00 copay for doctor’s visits, but everything else is coinsurance.

So right away, you’re going to pay $2,400.00/year just to have the insurance.  It’s also important to remember that this is per person.  So it’s $3,500.00 per person.  In most cases, there will be a ‘Family Maximum Out of Pocket’, usually around 2.5 to 3 times any one out of pocket maximum for individuals.  So in this case, it might be around $12,000.00 to $14,000.00 Out of Pocket maximum for a whole year for the family.

So you’re paying $2,400.00 every year just to have this.  Then, you’re going to pay for, well, everything 100% up to the first 3500.00 per person.   After that, you’ll pay 20% of everything else.  Only unless you or one of your family members ends up with open heart surgery or a brain transplant will you likely cross the Out of Pocket maximum.  You may not even breach the deductible.  It is plausible that within a given year, you don’t go past the deductibles.

So at the end of the year, if any two of your family members need any type of testing or hospital based procedure, you’re looking at up to $7,000.00 out of your own pocket.  In addition to the $2,400.00 you paid to have the coverage in the first place.   That’s almost $10,000.00 out of your own pocket.  If you end up getting coverage to kick in, you’ll be spending more.  For your average schmuck Americans, lower middle class to middle class, that could end up being 20% or more of their entire annual income (the avg. income today is $52,000/year, which would make our example approx. 19% of the average annual income).

And it all starts over the following year.  Which could mean this scenario plays out multiple times over the course of raising a family. And not because they have no insurance, but because of the insurance they have.  And with kids, you know as well as I do it’s not stretching the imagination that there will be more than one year where you easily cap off the deductibles.  And yet in all of this, that insurance company you’ve been paying hasn’t had to cough up a red cent.

That is the problem.  What other industry is there where you have to pay for a service it routinely avoids providing?  I know that insurance is based on Risk.  That is, I pay for it in the hopes of never using it.  And the company insures me in the hopes that it never has to pay.  But something went terribly wrong with this system.   Somewhere, some how, the machine broke down.  And it isn’t lack of healthcare, or lack of insurance availability.  It’s the cost that you end up paying even when you have the insurance and the fact that, in millions of cases a year, the insurance has to pay little to nothing.  That is the problem.  A problem no particular policy proposal, as far as I can tell, has solved.

Well that ended up being longer than I planned.  And I didn’t even get to my ideas of why it happened or what to do.  That will be some other time.  I just figured some numbers needed kicked around, if for nobody else than me.  That way I get the problem.  The problem is we need insurance that won’t cause a vast number of Americans to go bankrupt if they end up using it.  And simply moving it from the private sector to the government or back won’t solve the problem.  A middle class family stuck with multiple years of $10,000.00 in out of pocket expenses is equally bad off whether private plan or ACA.

Current Events

Musings

Current Events

Previous Post



March 28, 2017

Wrong about Moore

Next Post



March 29, 2017 Covering the Bathroom Bill


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Atheism Awesome things Bigotry for the hip American Blogging Books Catholic Catholic Teaching Catholics on the Internet Christian Persecution Christian Unity Christianity and America Christianity in the Post-Modern World Christianity in the world Culture of Death Culture of Life Current Events Decline and Fall of the Christian West Defending Liberty Fun Stuff Global Warming Good Causes Good News Gun Control Health Care History Holidays Homeschool Humor Important things Inspiring Stories Interesting Insights Interesting Stories Islam and the West Liberal "Tolerance" Liberal observations Life in a post-Christian world Memorial Movies Musings News Other Blogs Our Big Politically Correct Bother Politics Popular Culture Post Modern Values Prayers Pro Life Promoting LGBT Protecting Liberty Racism in the world today Scientism Social Observations Sports Strange Stories The Boys The Catholic Church and the Left The Decline and Fall of the American Dream The end of liberty The Faith and the Left The Faith and the Right The Family The Greatness of God The Internet The Leftist Juggernaut The LGBT Question The Media The Pope The post-liberal Left The Power of Propaganda Tributes Twilight of the American Experiment Uncategorized Uneducating Postmoderns When the Church is wrong Why learn from history when we can repeat it instead Wisdom in the Post Modern Age World Events

Select a Month August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who saw the vision of the valley of dry bones?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ezekiel Jeremiah Daniel Isaiah

Related posts from Daffey Thoughts

Catholic

If the Confederacy was the same as Nazi...

Daffey Thoughts

Catholic

Exploiting racism cheapens racism

Daffey Thoughts

Catholic

Hysteria and lunacy

Daffey Thoughts

Catholic

Charlottesville: A Minority Opinion

Daffey Thoughts

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Creation, Preservation, and Teleology in Catholic Theology

As I write this, it is very early Monday morning. Like millions...

The Parable Of The Sower And The Word...

One of Christ’s most famous parables is that of the sower who...

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube