On the other hand Ms. Clinton

Last updated on: July 22, 2016 at 8:12 am by Dave Griffey

On the other hand Ms. Clinton 2016-07-21T20:20:52-04:00 Dave Griffey

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Please don’t insult my intelligence with this idea that Trump has somehow ended the “Party of Lincoln.” If we set aside the leftist puritanism that seeks to drape racism over anyone and everyone who lived more than ten years ago, the idea that the Democrats had some abiding respect for the GOP up until now has got to be one of the biggest stretches of word-drool I’ve ever heard.

What got me interested in politics in the first place was the 1980 election of Ronald Reagan. From casual conversation to actual political punditry, the consensus was clear: We were doomed. Reagan, like the GOP and American Conservatives in general, was a warmongering, right wing, Big Brother, corporate junkie who was just itching to nuke the world. In fact, the general opinion among young people was that we better get lucky quick, since because of Reagan our days were numbered.

The fact that America would elect someone so dedicated to nuking the world piqued my interest. I was only in 8th grade, and certainly didn’t mind the idea of indulging myself due to our inevitable doom, but I couldn’t get past this idea that America had made such a horrible mistake. If we were such a great country – and even by 1980, the general consensus still was that we were a great country – how could we do such a thing? How could we let people like Reagan and conservatives, who were universally portrayed as stupid, racists, sexists, bigots, warmongers, military machine advocates and idiots (except for William F. Buckley, Jr.) take control? From there I began my long journey toward an eventual focus on political science.

Through the 80s and beyond, the GOP often was compared to Nazis, the KKK, mocked as morons, dolts, idiots. Sometimes this even happened on the floor of Congress. They were Frank Burns and Archie Bunker. They were general General Sline, prepared to nuke the world for the American way. They were Big Brother, invading our bedrooms and imposing their values and trying to ‘legislate morality’. From sitcoms to movies to SNL to daytime talk shows to pop music to news editorials and magazines to college textbooks, the overwhelming witness was one of a party barely two steps away from parades down the streets of Nuremberg, but without the brains.

From Bork to Quayle, from Bush to Bush, from Limbaugh to FOX, anyone remotely associated with conservatism and the GOP was immediately lumped into the same category. As the legacy of America increasingly became one of genocide, imperialism, racism, bigotry, intolerance, religious zealotry and puritanism, the conservative attempt to hold to the country’s heritage only added fuel to the fire. By the Clinton years, when President Clinton had no problem taking an entire swath of the nation, portraying them as hicks and hayseeds with their confederate flags and shotguns in the truck, it was apparent that we were talking about a movement seen by the Left with all the affection that McCarthy once held for American Communists.

And that was the official takes that we heard from Democrats, political leaders, media personnel, entertainers and academics. I’m not talking about what was said on the street. Before the internet, you didn’t have a chance to hear what someone in Zimbabwe or Kamchatka Krai has to say on an issue as easily as today, but you still heard what people had to say. Especially among the younger generations, Boomers and the subsequent age groups, the attacks on Reagan, Nancy, Bush, Quayle, Gingrich, the GOP, Limbaugh, Conservatives and Conservative Christians (including, as it was assumed, Pope John Paul II), was as bad as anything I’ve heard about Obama.

In 1988 I was in college. Ronald Reagan came to speak at The Ohio State University. Though being a Democrat and liberal agnostic, I was influenced by my WWII generation parents who felt you could disagree with a politician and still respect him. A friend of mine – more liberal than I was – went with me to hear what he had to say. Hardly any security compared to today. We sat to his right, about 150 feet away in the arena. Behind us was a section of young men, probably in their late 20s to early 30s. Fellows who would have been in middle school in the late 60s. The things they said out loud about Reagan – about Nancy Reagan as well – still sends shivers down my spine. Both my friend and I were stunned. The idea that our modern discourse is the result of talk radio or cable news or Facebook is as wrong as you can get. I think it’s generational. It certainly isn’t confined to one side, nor did it suggest that Democrats in government, media or on the street held the GOP and conservatives in the highest regards.

The party that tacitly allowed SNL, Bill Maher, Comedy Central and Wanda Sykes to run down and dirty propaganda for it without getting it own hands dirty, that is acts shocked at Trump’s manners and vulgarity (at least he has the guts to say it himself), now wants to convince me that it is saddened by what Trump has done to the GOP for reasons that I can’t grasp. Ms. Clinton, don’t act as if this is some party that you and the liberal Democrats admired except for a few unfortunate disagreements with which you respectfully disagreed. Acting that way, and suggesting Trump has done damage to this vaunted political party, would be like Jack Chick saying ‘Look what Pope Francis has done to the Body of Christ.’ Nope. Chick at least is consistent and doesn’t pretend like he had regard for Catholicism before Pope Francis. Perhaps Hillary Clinton and the Democratic representatives could learn a few points from Chick when it comes to honesty. If nothing else, at least Chick doesn’t act like I’m too stupid to remember what he said about the Church five years ago. It would be nice if the Democrats and Hillary Clinton could do the same.

Politics

Social Observations

Previous Post

July 22, 2016

Don McClarey touches on the subject I posted about earlier

Next Post

July 22, 2016 I tried to watch the Trump speech

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Atheism Awesome things Bigotry for the hip American Blogging Books Catholic Catholic Teaching Catholics on the Internet Christian Persecution Christian Unity Christianity and America Christianity in the Post-Modern World Christianity in the world Culture of Death Culture of Life Current Events Decline and Fall of the Christian West Defending Liberty Fun Stuff Global Warming Good Causes Good News Gun Control Health Care History Holidays Homeschool Humor Important things Inspiring Stories Interesting Insights Interesting Stories Islam and the West Liberal "Tolerance" Liberal observations Life in a post-Christian world Memorial Movies Musings News Other Blogs Our Big Politically Correct Bother Politics Popular Culture Post Modern Values Prayers Pro Life Promoting LGBT Protecting Liberty Racism in the world today Scientism Social Observations Sports Strange Stories The Boys The Catholic Church and the Left The Decline and Fall of the American Dream The end of liberty The Faith and the Left The Faith and the Right The Family The Greatness of God The Internet The Leftist Juggernaut The LGBT Question The Media The Pope The post-liberal Left The Power of Propaganda Tributes Twilight of the American Experiment Uncategorized Uneducating Postmoderns When the Church is wrong Why learn from history when we can repeat it instead Wisdom in the Post Modern Age World Events

Select a Month August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How tall was Goliath according to the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

About 6 feet 5 inches About 10 feet 5 inches About 8 feet About 9 feet 9 inches