Taking gun violence seriously

Last updated on: June 4, 2016 at 8:02 am by Dave Griffey

Taking gun violence seriously 2016-06-04T08:02:00-04:00 Dave Griffey

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Or not. Mark is part of that movement that seems to have no particular interest in solving the question of violence in America. That isn’t always the case. There are fair minded people who acknowledge the role that mental health, our cultural breakdown, our current attitudes and even educational philosophy might have in violence who are willing to call for examining gun violence.

They will propose certain ideas that are worth listening to. Likewise, I am at times bothered that the NRA and other gun rights advocates seem to close their ears to any limitations or restrictions or even common sense appeals to rethink the current approach to gun merchandising and distribution. Nobody is ever always right, and it’s worth considering that, say, keeping guns out of the hands of terror suspects, or mandatory schooling upon the purchase of a gun, are worth kicking around. After all, to get a hunting license you have to take courses in gun and hunting safety. Why not guns in general? Maybe not. But it’s OK to have the debate.

The problem with Mark’s approach of screaming 33,000 killed, 33,000 killed!, 33k Killed! is that it conflates the data. It ignores the details and doesn’t take into account the various categories within the number, nor the context in which it all happens. Within that number are suicides, crime on crime violence, drugs, age, demographics of various sorts – a lot to process. There are also more killed than that who are killed by other means. And what of the terrorist numbers Mark references? Is Mark suggesting that there are far more Muslims bent on killing than there are Americans? What does that say about the religion of peace if almost 1/4 of their population is about terrorism? If not, if there are fewer Muslims causing so much death, then Mark’s comparison seems to make little sense (they would then be quite efficient at killing to achieve such numbers with so few).

But what about other victims of violence who didn’t have the good fortune of being shot? The most chilling example of ignoring the others came in 2014 when six college people were slain in California by a single deranged killer. In the tragic killings, 3 of the victims were shot, and 3 were stabbed to death. If ever something demonstrated that there are those trying to solve the problem of violence in America versus only wanting to exploit violence to advance agendas, it was that. Even on the news round tables, some tried to mention the three killed by stabbing, only to be swiped away in favor of focusing on Gun Control.

In the comboxes it was worse. Even on Marks blog, to bring up the three stabbed was to be accused of changing the subject or bringing up irrelevant points to dodge the important topic of gun violence. Since when was mentioning three murdered people a dodge? That, as much as anything, screamed foul and suggested we are looking at a movement more concerned about controlling gun ownership than necessarily solving the problem of violence in America.

As I’ve said, most gun owners I know have no problem looking to see what might help curb gun violence, as long as we look at the actual violence, culture, facts, and keep it real. Most are, however, highly suspicious of Gun Control Advocates, up to and including President Obama. After all, Obama promised that the Healthcare Reform legislation would not infringe upon religious conscience regarding abortifacients and contraception. I think those who are suspicious of his claims of honoring gun rights are right, and sensible, to be suspicious. Fool me once after all.

Nonetheless, it is arguments like Mark’s that go a long way toward keeping the problems alive, and ignoring opportunities to look at the larger picture of violence in America. Why? Why the preference for avoiding reasonable debate when we do have a violence problem in our society? I can only guess.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 4, 2016

An interesting question about the Atomic Bombs and the biblical Flood narrative

Next Post

June 4, 2016 Muhammad Ali has died

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Atheism Awesome things Bigotry for the hip American Blogging Books Catholic Catholic Teaching Catholics on the Internet Christian Persecution Christian Unity Christianity and America Christianity in the Post-Modern World Christianity in the world Culture of Death Culture of Life Current Events Decline and Fall of the Christian West Defending Liberty Fun Stuff Global Warming Good Causes Good News Gun Control Health Care History Holidays Homeschool Humor Important things Inspiring Stories Interesting Insights Interesting Stories Islam and the West Liberal "Tolerance" Liberal observations Life in a post-Christian world Memorial Movies Musings News Other Blogs Our Big Politically Correct Bother Politics Popular Culture Post Modern Values Prayers Pro Life Promoting LGBT Protecting Liberty Racism in the world today Scientism Social Observations Sports Strange Stories The Boys The Catholic Church and the Left The Decline and Fall of the American Dream The end of liberty The Faith and the Left The Faith and the Right The Family The Greatness of God The Internet The Leftist Juggernaut The LGBT Question The Media The Pope The post-liberal Left The Power of Propaganda Tributes Twilight of the American Experiment Uncategorized Uneducating Postmoderns When the Church is wrong Why learn from history when we can repeat it instead Wisdom in the Post Modern Age World Events

Select a Month August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who interpreted Nebuchadnezzar's dream of a statue?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Daniel Joseph Ezekiel Abraham