Oops he did it again

Last updated on: February 15, 2016 at 10:58 am by Dave Griffey

Oops he did it again 2016-02-15T10:58:00-04:00 Dave Griffey

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Mark Shea once again indulges in the time honored game of Catholic Word Play. You see, here is the problem. From 2008 through 2012, Mark and many others on the Catholic Internet made the case very clear: voting for the lesser of two evils was basically just giving into Satan. Especially in presidential elections where our votes don’t count anyway. Sure, you could vote for the lesser of two evils. After all, Pope Benedict said so in clear terms, and the US Bishops said so as well.

And yet, Mark also made it clear, especially on his now defunct blog, that doing so was nothing less than dancing with Satan. It was compromising the purer faith and potentially jeopardizing your soul. Those who tried to argue for Romney or McCain were subject to a blistering assault from Mark, and many of his readers, with the accusation that they were putting tribalist loyalties above their very salvation. If Mark’s public writings made it clear he had little good to say about voting for the lesser evil, his blog posts drove the point home in no uncertain terms.

In fact, by the end Mark was saying there was no real justification in his mind for voting for the lesser of two evils for either party:

“So here’s the deal: I see no proportionate good in supporting candidates from either party who support grave evil. I do, however, see a proportionate good in refraining from voting should no candidate appear on the ballot who does not advocate grave evil.” (National Catholic Register, 2011)

But now, Mark is stuck allowing liberal Catholics a clean conscience even if they cast a vote for one of America’s most pro-culture of death politicians, Bernie Sanders.

“The Church’s intellectual and moral tradition on such questions is not geared toward telling you what to think, but how to think: how to navigate the varying prudential decisions that must be made in order to cast a vote with a reasonably quiet conscience. And that means different Catholics will arrive at different conclusions in good faith.” (National Catholic Register, 2016)

Note the difference in tone. True, technically nothing has changed. Mark says the same thing, sort of. But the emphasis now is clearly on the acceptability of voting for the lesser of two evils in good faith, under certain conditions, rather than insisting there is really only one way for the serious Catholic to vote.

How do we reconcile such an apparent disconnect in only four years? Easy. Mark demonstrates how a talented writer can play at words in order to make sure that when he said Red was the best color four years ago, he clearly meant Blue was entirely acceptable. Mark has discovered an out. He now says you still can’t vote for the lesser of two evils. That’s voting for evil. Just like he said. But if you vote to limit evil then it is just fine. The first, which he accuses conservatives of, is clearly cynical and wrong.

That is the lesson of the story … if you interpret it correctly

But the second, wanting to limit evil, is quite acceptable. Righteous. Beautiful. Therefore those who will support Bernie because they believe they will limit the evil of conservatism and the GOP, have no issues. They are limiting evil. It’s not like those right wingers of the past who voted for the least evil Romney in order to limit the assaults on religious liberty, abortion and gay marriage or anything. That was cynical. That was tribalism. That was putting party politics above the Church. That really was voting for the lesser of two evils, not voting to limit evil.

See the obvious difference? No? Well, neither do I. Because there isn’t one. Not in the real world of day to day living. Most who vote in such a way will likely feel they are doing it because ‘this fellow will do less damage and evil than that fellow over there.’ That’s all. That’s what they meant with supporting Romney. That’s what those who will vote for Bernie will probably mean. And, at the end of the day, that’s what the Bishops say. But Mark, who made it clear the jaws of Hell potentially yawn before those who would take the lower road of voting for the lesser evils in 2011, now has to scramble to justify why doing the same thing for a Democratic candidate he clearly admires, despite the candidate’s vibrant track record for the culture of death, is actually hunky-dory.

If you want to know when to pull the ripcord on someone, consistency is a good thing to watch. At least consistency or the willingness to admit change, since people, as Nate points out in the comments, do change. Do they say what was true four years ago is still true today? Do they admit they have changed and see it differently? Or do they seem to be saying it’s all different, but was really always true as long as you interpret it correctly? When following shepherds, make sure they plot a straight course for the sheepfold every time, or admit this time it will be different. If it looks like a different sheepfold than last time, and yet the shepherd insists it’s all the same, you might want to jump ship and find a new shepherd.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

February 15, 2016

Ross Douthat

Next Post

February 15, 2016 Hint

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Atheism Awesome things Bigotry for the hip American Blogging Books Catholic Catholic Teaching Catholics on the Internet Christian Persecution Christian Unity Christianity and America Christianity in the Post-Modern World Christianity in the world Culture of Death Culture of Life Current Events Decline and Fall of the Christian West Defending Liberty Fun Stuff Global Warming Good Causes Good News Gun Control Health Care History Holidays Homeschool Humor Important things Inspiring Stories Interesting Insights Interesting Stories Islam and the West Liberal "Tolerance" Liberal observations Life in a post-Christian world Memorial Movies Musings News Other Blogs Our Big Politically Correct Bother Politics Popular Culture Post Modern Values Prayers Pro Life Promoting LGBT Protecting Liberty Racism in the world today Scientism Social Observations Sports Strange Stories The Boys The Catholic Church and the Left The Decline and Fall of the American Dream The end of liberty The Faith and the Left The Faith and the Right The Family The Greatness of God The Internet The Leftist Juggernaut The LGBT Question The Media The Pope The post-liberal Left The Power of Propaganda Tributes Twilight of the American Experiment Uncategorized Uneducating Postmoderns When the Church is wrong Why learn from history when we can repeat it instead Wisdom in the Post Modern Age World Events

Select a Month August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Jesus do for Lazarus in Bethany?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Fed him Raised him from the dead Turned him invisible Healed his blindness