Newsweek throws red meat to the tribal faithful

Last updated on: February 7, 2016 at 3:35 pm by Dave Griffey

Newsweek throws red meat to the tribal faithful 2016-02-07T15:35:00-04:00 Dave Griffey

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

And announces that it is Right Wing Extremists who are the real threat to Americans. Of course they are. America is the third largest population in the world with 318 million Americans. Of those, only .9% are Muslim. 31% are Conservative. That means 98,580,000 Americans identify as Conservative vs. 2,862,000 who identify as Muslim.

Now, approximately 26.9% of Americans are under 20 years old, and about 9.1% are 70 years old or older. That’s about 36% who are outside of the adults who are capable of killing. I know that 19 year olds or 12 year olds or 75 year olds are capable of killing. But for the sake of arguing, let’s try to keep the numbers around those adults in America who are between 20 and 70. That’s 64% of these groups who are adults.

Now, what is an extremist? Surveys repeatedly taken of worldwide Muslims kept finding that between 10% to 16% of Muslims worldwide supported terrorism at least to some degree. That’s actually Muslims who support terrorism. That’s actually support strapping a bomb to a baby or killing a room filled with innocent civilians. I’d say that’s extreme. For the sake of arguing and charity, let’s make it 10%.

What about those Right Wingers? What is a “Right Wing Extremist”? For some liberals, of course, anyone not liberal is a Right Wing Extremist. But let’s assume not. Is it someone against the Government? Part of the KKK? Neo-Nazis? Self-proclaimed militia? Someone who doesn’t like Obama? A racist who happens to be Conservative? Do they all have to support bombing federal buildings and shooting up black churches to be extremist? I don’t know. It’s not defined. So let’s just keep the numbers relatively close. 10% of Conservatives are extremists at least capable of killing in the name of their ideals.

So that brings us back to the numbers. Based on the numbers above, approximately 181,000 adult American Muslims are extremists and either capable of, or fully supportive of, violence and killing. Compare that to around 6 million adult American conservatives who are the same. Since we’ve been assured that illegal immigration isn’t a problem regarding extremists, and the Muslim killers are always home grown, we won’t worry about the immigration issue. Just good old fashion American terrorists like Grandma used to make.

So there you go. You are more likely to get killed by an American Right Wing Extremist than a Muslim extremist. Naturally. Look at the numbers. How much more likely? Apparently quite a bit more likely. I would assume about 35% more likely, give or take. That would make sense based on population numbers. Of course I would also assume that I would be about 35% more likely to be killed in an auto accident with a Right Wing Extremist than a Muslim Extremist, or be swindled by a Right Wing Extremist than a Muslim Extremist, or 35% more likely to sit behind a Muslim extremist at a sporting event than sit behind a Right Wing Extremist at the same event. So in terms of killing, I would assume if there were 45 Americans killed by Muslims since 2002, that there have been around 1530 killed by American Right Wing extremists. Correct?

And yet, according to the Newsweek article, there were 45 people killed by Muslim extremists since 2002, and 48 killed by Right Wing Extremists. How can this be? That almost suggests that either fewer Right Wing Extremists are willing to kill, or there are far, far fewer Right Wing Extremists than we’re led to believe, or there are a crap ton more Muslim extremists, or something. Especially since the argument is we are spending too much time focused on Muslims and Islamic extremism when we should be focused on those Right Wingers. If that’s the case, then it stands to reason we’ve foiled more Islamic attacks than Right Wing attacks. At least I would think so. So something isn’t right. Somehow, when I step back and look, I’m far less convinced of the obvious bias that Newsweek is trying to get me to accept.

I admit I’m no statistician and numbers have never been my strong point. But I decided to play around with the numbers in my amateur fashion. After all, the article itself seemed to stink of hyper-left wing partisanship; bloody meat thrown to the rabid tribalists. For instance, it deftly avoids 2001 as the starting point for the casualty rate. That nicely dodges the whole 9/11 thing. But then, I couldn’t help but notice it drops the Oklahoma City Bombing in, just to remind us of what those Right Wingers are capable of. And yet, it never brings 9/11 into the equation to remind us of what those rascally Muslim extremists are capable of. Even if they argue they’re only worried about domestic terror, let’s not forget the 9/11 terrorists were here legally. And it also isn’t fair, then, to discount the possibility of immigrants legal and illegal. But let’s face it, that’s not why they mention Oklahoma and ignore 9/11. First red flag that got me to thinking.

It also tries to go through the history of right wing extremism, but without nodding to atrocities committed here or world wide by radical left wing organizations or Islamic nations through the years. That sort of ‘ignore part of the evidence and you can prove anything’ form of propaganda immediately sends up warning flares to me.

Of course the article paints a bleak picture, linking extremists with Republican leaders, racism and the GOP, Conservatives in general with their worst counterparts. That’s propaganda in the nutshell: use fact, twist facts, add lies, and mix with biases while ignoring inconvenient facts. How do you know Jews are corrupt? Find some corrupt people who happen to be Jewish and go from there. Same with Blacks. Same with Muslims. Same with Atheists. It’s a time honored approach. Not that some of the violence or evil done by Conservatives wouldn’t have a particular feel or tone about it. Sure it would. But the same goes for evil done by Christians, or Blacks, or Whites, or Muslims, or anyone. Or, dare I see, even liberals!

I’m not saying that there isn’t a story here. I’m not saying that we shouldn’t be looking at everything honestly – including violence done by Left and Right Wing extremists, and how such a small percentage of the population manages to kill almost as many as one of the largest demographic groups. But this article is not trying to look at facts. It is a little bit of raw meat thrown to the rabid wolves. In fact, anyone who takes this and immediately uses it to build any case at all should send up warning flags to the rest of us about that person’s credibility. I know I’d be hesitant to listen to such a person again. Which is why I seldom read Newsweek anymore.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

February 7, 2016

Happy Birthday Mr. Reagan

Next Post

February 7, 2016 I will wait and see

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Atheism Awesome things Bigotry for the hip American Blogging Books Catholic Catholic Teaching Catholics on the Internet Christian Persecution Christian Unity Christianity and America Christianity in the Post-Modern World Christianity in the world Culture of Death Culture of Life Current Events Decline and Fall of the Christian West Defending Liberty Fun Stuff Global Warming Good Causes Good News Gun Control Health Care History Holidays Homeschool Humor Important things Inspiring Stories Interesting Insights Interesting Stories Islam and the West Liberal "Tolerance" Liberal observations Life in a post-Christian world Memorial Movies Musings News Other Blogs Our Big Politically Correct Bother Politics Popular Culture Post Modern Values Prayers Pro Life Promoting LGBT Protecting Liberty Racism in the world today Scientism Social Observations Sports Strange Stories The Boys The Catholic Church and the Left The Decline and Fall of the American Dream The end of liberty The Faith and the Left The Faith and the Right The Family The Greatness of God The Internet The Leftist Juggernaut The LGBT Question The Media The Pope The post-liberal Left The Power of Propaganda Tributes Twilight of the American Experiment Uncategorized Uneducating Postmoderns When the Church is wrong Why learn from history when we can repeat it instead Wisdom in the Post Modern Age World Events

Select a Month August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

An angel appeared to a priest burning incense in the temple, announcing his wife would bear a son despite her old age. Who was this priest?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Simeon Eli Joseph Zechariah