Modern Atheism as bigotry

Last updated on: September 3, 2012 at 5:30 pm by Dave Griffey

Modern Atheism as bigotry 2012-09-03T17:30:00-04:00 Dave Griffey

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’ve said it before, and I’ll maintain it until things change: modern atheism is more a personality disorder than an intellectual phenomenon. Time and again, modern atheists and their chosen celebrities speak the language of bigotry, using time honored tactics used, not to examine evidence and reach conclusions, but to attack and destroy things that one already has deemed to be attack-worthy. Since the basic goal of modern atheism is the eradication of religion from the planet, and the suppression of the free exercise of religion in the meantime, I have little sympathy for it. Even when one breaks ranks and attempts to show some level of intellectual honesty and tolerance for other (religious) beliefs, the overwhelming response from fellow atheists suggests that tolerance and a willingness to live alongside religion is a fluke, not the modern norm.

Case in point. Over at the ironically named Friendly Atheist, Hemant Mehta tosses out a kudos to a church that held a garage sale in order to give out free items to the community. Since as far as he can tell there was no proselytizing at the event, he decides it was a good thing, and something atheists could learn from. This is true, as most atheism comes across as a rage against everything and hatred of anything, rather than a positive that does little more than promise a life of self focus and pointless narcissism expressed in hedonism. Personally, I chuckled at his qualifier that it was OK since there was no proselytizing, especially as Mr. Mehta himself has been a major supporter of the New Atheist Evangelism Explosion being promoted by the likes of Richard Dawkins. But that’s atheism for you.

But the part that got me was the comments. Read them. A couple folks jump in to admit this was actually a good thing, and atheists should join in. But others? Look at how many rush to point out that this church deserves no credit at all, good things happen all the time without churches, atheists are always doing such things (I guess the absence of a religious organization equals atheism), and there is nothing at all praiseworthy for what this church has done. The fact that Mr. Mehta seems pleasantly surprised by something churches by the millions have done for generations, just shows how out of touch many atheists are with the one subject that so defines them. The fact that others rail against the idea that churches deserve any credit at all shows how much of modern atheism is just bigotry in new clothes.

Repeat after me: if you have arranged the data to make sure a demographic is unable to get credit for anything good, while insisting that anything bad is the direct result of that same demographic, to paraphrase Jeff Foxworthy, you might be a bigot. Because if you arrange the numbers to make something look entirely evil while dismissing any good, I’m afraid you can make any people group look bad. And after the last century, you’d think we would have learned our lesson.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

September 3, 2012

I love living in smaller towns

Next Post

September 4, 2012 I should have finished my doctorate

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Atheism Awesome things Bigotry for the hip American Blogging Books Catholic Catholic Teaching Catholics on the Internet Christian Persecution Christian Unity Christianity and America Christianity in the Post-Modern World Christianity in the world Culture of Death Culture of Life Current Events Decline and Fall of the Christian West Defending Liberty Fun Stuff Global Warming Good Causes Good News Gun Control Health Care History Holidays Homeschool Humor Important things Inspiring Stories Interesting Insights Interesting Stories Islam and the West Liberal "Tolerance" Liberal observations Life in a post-Christian world Memorial Movies Musings News Other Blogs Our Big Politically Correct Bother Politics Popular Culture Post Modern Values Prayers Pro Life Promoting LGBT Protecting Liberty Racism in the world today Scientism Social Observations Sports Strange Stories The Boys The Catholic Church and the Left The Decline and Fall of the American Dream The end of liberty The Faith and the Left The Faith and the Right The Family The Greatness of God The Internet The Leftist Juggernaut The LGBT Question The Media The Pope The post-liberal Left The Power of Propaganda Tributes Twilight of the American Experiment Uncategorized Uneducating Postmoderns When the Church is wrong Why learn from history when we can repeat it instead Wisdom in the Post Modern Age World Events

Select a Month August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I wrote of a new covenant where God's law would be written not on stone but where?

Select your answer to see how you score.

In a book In the temple On their hearts On scrolls