Jewish leaders demonstrate the problem with rhetoric

Last updated on: January 13, 2011 at 9:02 am by Dave Griffey

Jewish leaders demonstrate the problem with rhetoric 2011-01-13T09:02:00-04:00 Dave Griffey

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Now I haven’t blogged much in the last couple days, owing in part to some other obligations. Also, while I did point to a few things that hopefully dispelled the shameful attempts by many to exploit the Arizona shootings for political gain, I didn’t want to go down there myself. Giving some time and quiet reflection for those who were the victims seemed good enough. But now I’m back to things, and thought I would comment on a strange issue that has come up.

Apparently, a barrage of criticisms from Jewish groups has erupted because Sarah Palin used the term blood libel. File this under WTH? Even the criticism is confusing. The Anti-Defamation league admits it is a term that has become part of common parlance, but then criticizes Palin for using it. Why? Are only some people allowed to use it? Because they don’t like Palin? What does that mean – it’s become common parlance but she shouldn’t have used it?

That is one of the problems in our modern discourse. I’ve spent days insisting that our rhetoric now is no different than in previous years. But that’s NOT to say that the context of our rhetoric is not different. It’s very different. The presence of 24 hour news channels, the existence of the Internet, can take a simple statement and run it over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over again and build up anger and resentment where it may not have been without the constant overplay.

Plus, we are an immature society. I heard Rush Limbaugh reflecting on his birthday yesterday. He made an interesting point. Baby Boomers (and I would say those generations that came after), didn’t have to grow up fast. In fact, the argument could be made that many never grew up at all. The celebrated Greatest Generation had to grow up fast. At 14, my Dad had to work in a lumber yard to help the family. A lumber yard. Today, at fourteen the worst our kids are even allowed to do is bag groceries. And that was par for the course. So by the time that generation as storming the beaches at Normandy, or landing at Iwo Jima, sure they were just kids. But they were kids already more mature and with more common sense wisdom than many Baby Boomer retirees today.

So there are differences in the context. But I also think a big, BIG, part of the angst in our dialogue is that we are dealing with foundational differences. We are literally seeing one side or the other side not really give a damn about anything but their own perspectives, because each side is rooted in conflicting foundational truths. The Anti-Defamation League didn’t come out with any condemnation of Palin’s accusers that I’m aware of, despite basing its existence on righting injustices because of the horrors of all the false accusations that the Jewish people had to bear throughout the centuries. But suddenly, Palin uses a word that the League admits is common, and Bam! Palin is playing to anti-Semitism. She can’t use that word. Can anyone use it? Can only Jewish people use it? Who can use it?

And that’s an issue. Each side wants to impose its values on everyone else, while opening the field for anyting it wants to do. So on one side we see the growth of harsh rhetoric, the F-Bombs, the accusations of this or that because we happen to like or disagree with this particular set of values, while on the other hand a growing list of Forbidden Terms is being imposed on us. You can say this, you can’t say that. You don’t dare say that’s so gay. But Christianity is an evil myth? No problem.

It’s a bi-polar society that not only tolerates, but encourages an extremely disrespectful, and even hateful round of dialogue as long as it suits this or that ideology, while closing the noose on a growing number of phrases, words, and idioms simply because this or that group may be offended.. A sort of tolerant/censorship approach which, I can’t help but guess, causes a lot of the tension and creates the impression that free speech belongs to only such as these, and not those over there. And that’s almost sure to cause the blood to boil in some sectors, more than any posters or slogans could ever do, if I’m any judge of human nature.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

January 13, 2011

Elizabeth Hughes learns the better side of human nature

Next Post

January 13, 2011 Man vs. Machine: Jeopardy style

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Atheism Awesome things Bigotry for the hip American Blogging Books Catholic Catholic Teaching Catholics on the Internet Christian Persecution Christian Unity Christianity and America Christianity in the Post-Modern World Christianity in the world Culture of Death Culture of Life Current Events Decline and Fall of the Christian West Defending Liberty Fun Stuff Global Warming Good Causes Good News Gun Control Health Care History Holidays Homeschool Humor Important things Inspiring Stories Interesting Insights Interesting Stories Islam and the West Liberal "Tolerance" Liberal observations Life in a post-Christian world Memorial Movies Musings News Other Blogs Our Big Politically Correct Bother Politics Popular Culture Post Modern Values Prayers Pro Life Promoting LGBT Protecting Liberty Racism in the world today Scientism Social Observations Sports Strange Stories The Boys The Catholic Church and the Left The Decline and Fall of the American Dream The end of liberty The Faith and the Left The Faith and the Right The Family The Greatness of God The Internet The Leftist Juggernaut The LGBT Question The Media The Pope The post-liberal Left The Power of Propaganda Tributes Twilight of the American Experiment Uncategorized Uneducating Postmoderns When the Church is wrong Why learn from history when we can repeat it instead Wisdom in the Post Modern Age World Events

Select a Month August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the seventh commandment?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Thou shalt not murder. Thou shall not covet. Thou shall have no other gods before me. Thou shall not commit adultery.