The Devil and Rich Iott

Last updated on: October 14, 2010 at 8:20 pm by Dave Griffey

The Devil and Rich Iott 2010-10-14T20:20:00-04:00 Dave Griffey

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Or, if the media coverage is to be believed, we could say the Devil is Rich Iott. Despite claims to the contrary, Rich Iott is not one of the darlings of the Tea Party. Though he’s from my own state, I hadn’t heard of him before the story broke. I first heard about it Sunday morning as I was doing some work in the living room. I had the TV on, and suddenly heard someone say ‘…and the Republicans have a candidate who dresses like Nazis.’

Since I both study and teach history in different capacities, I knew immediately what it was about. Obviously an historical reeanactor. Though I never was one myself, I’ve known them and visited them for many, many years. I’m involved enough in various historical hobbies to understand their basic designs. Of course there could be all types, as with any group. You could have nuts, bad apples, whatever. But without any other input, I knew what it was about.

I went to some liberal blogs that night, and it was already making the rounds. Republican Dresses Like Nazis! Of course the initial story from the Atlantic was of the same tenor; it’s purpose was to attack and build stereotypes, not to inform. By Monday it was everywhere. Republicans were abandoning him. Blogs were pouncing. By Tuesday his campaign was being attacked by graffiti in swastika form, and the hobby of reenacting was being called into question, cast with suspicious eyes, and described as ‘people who get into their rusty pickup trucks’ to drive around the country play acting.

All of this, of course, without anyone actually KNOWING anything about the subject. What of the group? Is it a Nazi group? Does it support Nazi ideals? It says it doesn’t. What of Iott? He says this was but one historical reenactment group, he rejects the Nazis as evil, and hadn’t been with that group for some time. Later pictures and testimonials appeared to support that account.

Yet the outrage, the condemnation, the contempt was there. The entire hobby, virtually ignored up until last Friday since who knows when, was suddenly cast aside as for losers at best, for people with severe moral deficiencies if not out right racism and evil at worst. Iott? He is toast. Done. Gone. The most charitable thing I found was a commentator who said ‘obviously he didn’t plan on running for politics when he did it!’

But why? Because, as a society we have gotten nowhere over the last many generations, if not many centuries, and we’ve gotten there fast. This may well have been someone being attacked for listening to colored rock music in the 50s. Or not knowing the Beatles’ names in the late 60s. Or being associated with Dungeons and Dragons in the 1980s. Or basically anything that doesn’t conform to the latest set of norms and values to which society demands conformity.

That’s right, conformity. For all the talk, all the strutting like peacocks under the banner of diversity, all the talk about opening our minds and respecting differences, there ends up being no such thing. Most of the condemnations leveled at this were by people who started by saying ‘I don’t know anything about reenacting.’ Some clever people, even on Catholic blogs, asked me ‘how do I know he ISN’T a racist? Huh?’ Well, because I assume innocence until proven guilty, and since I understand the sub-culture of historical reenacting, I can understand what was going on. Sure, maybe they weren’t the best group, or were lacking in accuracy or a sophisticated balance of history from the POV of the Nazis versus the needed condemnation of the Nazis. But that’s about all we could say with what little was known.

But that’s not what we said. That was by no means what we said. Condemnation, contempt, accusation, verdict, punishment – all of these were the talk of the day. He was called a moral idiot at best, a Nazi racist at worst. No amount of reasoning with people was accepted. What few tried to suggest we may be leaping to conclusions were almost as quickly called into question for their agendas or possible prejudices.

And the funniest thing? Besides, of course, being in a society that is supposed to be based on diversity, tolerance, and open mindedness? That many of those quickest to accuse and condemn are the ones who scream loudest when our Society condemns their pet interests. When some fundamentalist links Harry Potter to witchcraft, or when the MSM floats Pope Benedict’s membership in the Hitler Youth without delving into the details, many of these folks were the first and loudest to cry foul. And they should have cried foul. But now, many were grabbing rope and lumber and preparing for their own lynching.

The reason? Many different reasons in all likelihood. Some because they have axes to grind or agendas to push. Either blasting American politics, washing hands of both parties, or being partisan to one (in this case, the Democrats), made jumping to condemnation a sure thing. Others had personal reasons, feeling that such a hobby so close to the events is beneath contempt, too offensive, to insensitive. That might be more credible if it weren’t for the fact that insensitivity and offensiveness is fast becoming the main foundation on which to build socially acceptable censorship. Or it may be because people are as people always have been, and despite our assurances that we’ve grown and learned and progressed, the fact is we, and the society we are building, have done no such thing. We are the same as we always have been. Fearing, loathing, or having contempt for things we neither like or understand at best, gladly attacking, even destroying those who stand in the way of our agendas at worst.

In either case, it’s clear that there is irony involved. For the crime of Iott was failing to walk that narrow line in dealing with Nazi history. Few can deal with this subject without criticism and condemnation. If you do anything with Nazi history beyond simple condemnation, you do so at your own risk. And yet we insist we learn about that period of time so as not to repeat it. And yet, knowing that many were willing to attack and accuse someone without evidence or even a desire of evidence, simply because he was different or inconvenient next to our agendas, one must ask just who it is that really wasn’t learning from history after all.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

October 14, 2010

Halloween Fun!

Next Post

October 15, 2010 Bill O'Reilly on The View

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Atheism Awesome things Bigotry for the hip American Blogging Books Catholic Catholic Teaching Catholics on the Internet Christian Persecution Christian Unity Christianity and America Christianity in the Post-Modern World Christianity in the world Culture of Death Culture of Life Current Events Decline and Fall of the Christian West Defending Liberty Fun Stuff Global Warming Good Causes Good News Gun Control Health Care History Holidays Homeschool Humor Important things Inspiring Stories Interesting Insights Interesting Stories Islam and the West Liberal "Tolerance" Liberal observations Life in a post-Christian world Memorial Movies Musings News Other Blogs Our Big Politically Correct Bother Politics Popular Culture Post Modern Values Prayers Pro Life Promoting LGBT Protecting Liberty Racism in the world today Scientism Social Observations Sports Strange Stories The Boys The Catholic Church and the Left The Decline and Fall of the American Dream The end of liberty The Faith and the Left The Faith and the Right The Family The Greatness of God The Internet The Leftist Juggernaut The LGBT Question The Media The Pope The post-liberal Left The Power of Propaganda Tributes Twilight of the American Experiment Uncategorized Uneducating Postmoderns When the Church is wrong Why learn from history when we can repeat it instead Wisdom in the Post Modern Age World Events

Select a Month August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Where did Philip meet the Ethiopian eunuch?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Desert road Jericho road Jerusalem road Samaria road