Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Cultivare

Expectation of Suffering

Last updated on: July 3, 2014 at 7:07 am   by Daniel Harrell

Expectation of Suffering 2014-05-09T12:19:03-04:00 Daniel Harrell

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Today’s guest post comes from John Barrett, one of an excellent class of students from Bethel Seminary who recently studied the intersection between theology and science.

“For affliction does not come from the dust, neither does trouble sprout from the ground, for man is born for trouble, as sparks fly upward,” (Job 5:6-7).  These words spoken to Job speak to the natural condition of man.  In fact, it expresses just the opposite of our expectations; we tend to believe that trouble is somehow an anomaly, rather than the apparent norm.  Such is the difficulty with our response to suffering.  When we neither imagine its possibility nor believe in its necessity, it always finds us unprepared.  C.S. Lewis says of the Christian, “. . . but from our present point of view it ought to be clear that the real problem is not why some pious, humble, believing people suffer, but why some do not,” (The Problem of Pain, 104).  It seems that in Lewis’ mind, The Grieving Saint, is the customary state.

Suffering is precipitated by some manner of personal affliction which may include physical or emotional pain or distress that comes in the form of sickness, poverty, or oppression.  There is also the idea of national affliction which comes through war or various calamities.  In addition to these, Christians commonly experience affliction in the form of persecution by those in opposition to the cause of Christ.  In this, there is also an expectation; “. . . so that no man may be disturbed by these afflictions; for you yourselves know that we have been destined for this (1 Thess. 3:3).  The theology of the suffering Savior does not exempt Christ from affliction rather it is intimately tied to the expectation that He would suffer.  Christ makes this expectation very clear, “The Son of Man must suffer many things, and be rejected by the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and raised on the third day, “ (Luke 9:22).

Jesus, whose life was marked with the expectation of suffering from the days Isaiah, “He was despised and forsaken of men, a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief; and like one from whom men hide their face, He was despised, and we did not esteem Him,” (Isaiah 53:3); He stands as the model for all believers.  His own prophetic expression concerning what we would face further affirms this expectation of suffering, “These things I have spoken to you, that in Me you may have peace. In the world you have tribulation, but take courage; I have overcome the world,” (John 16:33).  But in as much as there is an expectation that we will suffer, there is also an expectation that it has been overcome and will be temporary, the Psalmist rejoices that “For His anger is but for a moment, His favor is for a lifetime; Weeping may last for the night, but a shout of joy comes in the morning,” (Psalms 30:5).

The Christian experience is profound with expectation.  We wait, expectant for the fruition of God’s plan of redemption; love, mercy and long-suffering are hallmarks of that expectation.  Until that day, our personal theology, while not dwelling on the expectation of suffering should acknowledge, as did Job, “. . . shall we indeed accept good from God and not accept adversity?”

Daniel Harrell

Previous Post



July 2, 2014

Incarnational Hermeneutics

Next Post



July 7, 2014 The Ironic Relativism of Evangelical Fundamentalism


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Alex Blondeau Authors Daniel Harrell Daniel Siedell Dawn Duncan Harrell Kyle Roberts Uncategorized Wyndy Corbin

Select a Month November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Jesus do for Lazarus in Bethany?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Turned him invisible Raised him from the dead Fed him Healed his blindness

Related posts from Cultivare

Evangelical

Signs of the Apocalypse

Cultivare

Evangelical

Your Summer Reading

Cultivare

Evangelical

Love

Cultivare

Evangelical

Adam and Science: A Possible Compromise

Cultivare

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube