Gendercide isn’t a ‘Women’s Issue’ (it’s a Theological One)

Last updated on: May 22, 2014 at 11:22 am by Kyle Roberts

Gendercide isn’t a ‘Women’s Issue’ (it’s a Theological One) 2014-05-22T11:22:23-04:00 Kyle Roberts

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Untold millions of women and girls around the globe are victims of physical and sexual violence. In the U.S. alone, over one million women suffer a physical assault by a partner. 25% of American women have been or will be victims of sexual assault. In many

source: NigerianCurrent

countries, structural and systemic violence against women results in even more horrifying statistics. How can we possibly wrap our minds around the violence committed towards women globally? The recent kidnappings of Nigerian girls by Boko Haram has raised to the surface a tragic reality that often goes unnoticed and unmentioned. What does the Christian church have to say to violence against women? And why is it that many Christian churches (and pastors) are part of the problem rather than part of the solution?

Elizabeth Gerhardt’s recent book, The Cross and Gendercide, addresses these questions. She argues that gendercide and other forms of violence, oppression, and exploitation of women and girls must be seen as more than a ‘women’s issue.” It most certainly a human rights issue, but one that calls for a theological analysis and response by the Christian church. She has put forth such an analysis and response in this important book, suggesting that the best way to understand violence against women is through a theology of the cross. She puts Luther and Bonhoeffer to work in helping us imagine how to face into this darkness. As she puts it,

A moral and ethical response from the Christian church is only a partial response. What is needed is a powerful, holistic and missional response rooted in a biblical theology of the cross because a theology of the cross does not separate proclamation of the gospel from the prophetic and active role of working to end injustice for millions of women and girls. (25)

The theological basis of social justice work matters, because it enables the church to thoughtfully respond, rather than simply react, to issues like gendercide (26). The starting point for this theological response, she rightfully points out, is the gospel. We must begin our reflection with God, who is both hidden and revealed in the suffering Christ, on the cross. For Gerhardt, “A theology of the cross is our lens for seeing more clearly the call God has for our lives and on our churches” (32).

Gerhardt provides Christians with a model for addressing social problems via a dialectic between the “two tasks of the church, kerygma and diakonia” [proclamation of the gospel and service] (80). In so doing, she offers a strong case for why social justice ought be divorced from theological reflection. But neither can theological reflection be done apart from the shadow side of humanity and the social ills and structural sins of our situation.

Indeed, theology, when disconnected from reality, can itself add to social ills and become demonic. In chapter 3, where she unpacks the history of the “social, religious, and political roots of violence against women and girls,” she tells stories of actual resistance by pastors and other Christians to her own advocacy work for abused women. She writes,

I soon realized through my engagement with Christian churches that the very work of helping to empower and educate women with regard to their inherent dignity and right to life and safety was a threat to those that believed in a patriarchal system as a means to hold onto power. (66)

Theology can be either a means of oppression and injustice or a critique of injustice in the service of liberation and in proclamation of the gospel of Jesus. Reflecting on the Cross and Gendercide, it’s easy to see the better choice. I hope, in a subsequent post, to focus in more on Gerhardt’s particular framing of the “theology of the cross.”

Kyle Roberts

Elizabeth Gerhardt

gendercide

theology of the cross

Previous Post

May 21, 2014

Tension

Next Post

May 28, 2014 The Bible Tells Me So

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Alex Blondeau Authors Daniel Harrell Daniel Siedell Dawn Duncan Harrell Kyle Roberts Uncategorized Wyndy Corbin

Select a Month November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What river did the Israelites cross to enter the Promised Land?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jordan River Tigris River Nile River Euphrates River