Establishing One’s I-ness

Last updated on: January 29, 2014 at 8:10 am by Daniel Harrell

Establishing One’s I-ness 2013-12-30T10:13:57-04:00 Daniel Harrell

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Today’s guest post comes from Reggie Robinson, one of an excellent class of students from Bethel Seminary who recently studied the intersection between faith, vocation and work.

What does it mean to be human? Is a human being a soul imprisoned in a body (Plato), an isolated thinking thing (Descartes), consumers that are moved and shaped by an invisible hand (Smith), a being-for-the-other (Lèvinas), or perhaps something else? The answer to this question, for the Christian, must stem from the religious ground motive of creation, fall, redemption, consummation. From this Christian religious ground motive, it is observed that human beings normatively play a critical role in the development of the world in each of its sovereign spheres.

Beginning with creation, the cultural mandate establishes that humanity was created to “Be fertile and increase, fill the earth and master it, and rule over the fish of the sea, the birds of the sky, and all the living things that creep on the earth” (Genesis 1:28). Humanity was given a task, a normative role to play in the interworking of God’s good creation. One sees this in action in the naming of the animals (Genesis 2:19) and in God’s very own forming of the world, in which humanity, as image bearers, are called to replicate. Work is normative, and thereby does not derive as some product of the fall.

However, the fall does have its ramifications on work. As the story goes, in order to be fertile and increase in number, there would be birth pains (Genesis 3:16), and in order to rule over the various facets of creation, humanity would have to battle weeds, it would become more tedious (Genesis 3:19). All of creation had been disrupted by the fall from grace. What sin did was corrupt and distort, but it does not destroy, God’s good creation. Ultimately, with humanity’s fall, it put humanity at odds with the divine, one’s neighbor, oneself, and nature.

As a mediation factor in these conflicts, God provided grace and redemption. Grace in the temple/church to assist in ones relationship with the divine, the state to legislate ones relations with ones neighbors, and a savior to reconcile all things to Christ-self (Colossians 1:20). What one sees develop are specific normative spheres, that are endowed by God, for humanity’s benefit including: the ecclesial, economic, scientific, familial, gubernatorial, aesthetic, etc. Humanity normatively must function within each of these spheres. Humanity is tasked with guiding each sphere in accordance with its creational calling as it has been set free from the bondage of sin in Christ’s death on the cross.

The once-for-all sacrifice of Christ ushered in a kingdom, a kingdom in which Christians, as renewed creatures (2 Corinthians 5:17), participate in. This must be understood as the now-but-not-yet kingdom of God. While the final New Jerusalem is ultimately of a divine origin, specifically in in its offering the final cleansing of the creation, yet humanity is not called to a passive role. Rather each person is called upon to use their skill set in each of the sovereign spheres to build up the kingdom of God. Everyone is necessary and equally valid, from the pastor to the farmer, in the kingdom (1 Corinthians 12:21). Each is called upon to use the skill set that God has given them for the development of creation, towards the kingdom of God.

One’s I-ness is thereby not derived as isolated thinking things or even necessarily in ones relationship to another, nor is ones placement here an accident or some form of imprisonment, but rather there is a much higher calling, a calling to image God in every way. To be Christ’s ambassadors as if Christ was making His appeal through us (2 Corinthians 5:20). The appeal Christ makes in each individual is going to look different, to some are given the task of parenting, to others the task of businessperson, and yet others a task of missionary. But even these various tasks must not define one’s I-ness, for the individual must encompass more than the role one plays in any individual sphere. I-ness is in fact an indissoluble cohesion of the role one plays in each of the sovereign spheres, roles that, for the Christian, are ultimately rooted in the creation, fall, redemption, and consummation religious ground motive.

Daniel Harrell

Previous Post

January 27, 2014

The Eternal Melody: Mendelssohn and Bonhoeffer

Next Post

February 5, 2014 Gladys, Starbucks, and Steve: Finding Calling in the Unemployment Generation

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Alex Blondeau Authors Daniel Harrell Daniel Siedell Dawn Duncan Harrell Kyle Roberts Uncategorized Wyndy Corbin

Select a Month November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many minor prophets are there in the Old Testament?

Select your answer to see how you score.

15 10 12 7