TV Was Better When There Were Only Five Channels

Last updated on: April 3, 2013 at 8:00 am by Daniel Harrell

TV Was Better When There Were Only Five Channels 2013-04-02T15:38:12-04:00 Daniel Harrell

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

David Brooks’ New York Times column this week on same-sex marriage, entitled Freedom Loses One, could just as well been titled In Praise of Limits. His basic thrust was how the marriage severely limits freedom (if you define freedom as doing whatever you please). In America we have more at liberty than ever, as social mores and religious constraints have lost their cohesion and power. It is this liberty that has allowed homosexuality to grow in acceptance with society at large. It is ironic, therefore, that marriage equality would become so important an issue since it marriage represents a restriction of liberty.

Last week saw a setback for the forces of maximum freedom. A representative of millions of gays and lesbians went to the Supreme Court and asked the court to help put limits on their own freedom of choice. They asked for marriage. Marriage is one of those institutions — along with religion and military service — that restricts freedom. Marriage is about making a commitment that binds you for decades to come. It narrows your options on how you will spend your time, money and attention.

Limits may be a good thing. One of the commenters to Brooks’ column drew an analogy to television. “Television seemed better when we had 5 choices, not 500.” The analogy applies beyond the category of same-sex marriage to the power of limits at large. Take growing older. Having settled into my 50s, I am intimately aware of the loss of options I enjoyed in my younger days. Physically, of course, I am not as strong or as nimble as I was–nor do I expect to be–despite the barrage of Viagra and Cialis commercials. Nor do I have the kinds of opportunities vocationally speaking I may have once had. There was a day when I could contemplate an easy change of career with a lateral move in regard to salary or lifestyle. Now, starting fresh would represent a serious sacrifice that I’m unwilling to afford.

I’m stuck being a pastor instead of the movie director I once dreamed I’d be. But there’s some solace in this. I can focus on my calling without being distracted but what I am not. I can only be who I am now.

We spend our later years making peace with the decisions we made in our youth when we were ill-equipped to make them. But maybe that’s a good thing too. If we possessed the wisdom and experience of age in our youth, chances are we would never choose one path or another given all that we’ve learned about the restrictions of limits. We wouldn’t choose to do anything.

Daniel Harrell

Previous Post

April 2, 2013

Life and Death in the Artist's Studio

Next Post

April 9, 2013 God's Grace & Grammatical Violence: A Meditation on Jonah 4:1-4

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Alex Blondeau Authors Daniel Harrell Daniel Siedell Dawn Duncan Harrell Kyle Roberts Uncategorized Wyndy Corbin

Select a Month November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

A Samaritan stopped to help a wounded man after a priest and a Levite passed by. Where was the man traveling from and to?

Select your answer to see how you score.

From Bethany to Jerusalem From Galilee to Judea From Samaria to Nazareth From Jerusalem to Jericho