Debatable Lies

Last updated on: October 3, 2012 at 8:25 am by Daniel Harrell

Debatable Lies 2012-10-03T08:08:11-04:00 Daniel Harrell

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This wouldn’t be a proper theology and culture blog without a comment about the cultural event of the evening, the presidential debates. Before commenting on those, however, I thought I should say something in response to the gauntlet thrown down by my esteemed colleague in blogging, the right Rev Kimberly Hyatt. On Monday she asked why we pastors don’t just tell the truth, suggesting that we might be better off preaching as academics presenting research rather than as lawyers arguing cases. Ah, if Scripture were as cleanly cut as much as scientific data can be! And if only the interpretative tools we pastors employ were as subject to peer review and replication as those used by chemists and physicists (let’s leave the biologists out of it for now). Thanks to Kimberly for using lawyers as the derogatory referent point (no offense to my lawyer friends). I mean, she could have used politicians.

Which circles me back to my lead point and a post from Adam Clymer which begins with the following warning:

The claims you hear in Wednesday night’s presidential debate may be hazardous, if not to your health, then to your relationship to reality.

I’ll let you read the blog about how politicians use misleading claims and outright lies in debates, and then euphemize these lies into “contradictions of fact.” They do it because it works and we the people are too stupid during election season to care about facts. We like who we like.

Now I would never call a congregation stupid, but “just presenting the facts” isn’t possible in a sermon without a perspective from which those facts are presented. Like it or not, Baptist facts will look different from Pentecostal facts from Presbyterian facts no matter how much Greek and Hebrew and Aramaic you have under your belt. As Lincoln said, both sides read to the same Bible and pray to the same God. Of course he also said both could not be right, but it took the bloodiest war in American history to show that.

All this to say that I think we pastors need to be more like politicians sometimes. Not telling outright lies, of course, but using what we can to persuade people, debunk the enemy and change their thinking. Give everybody the word and the lexicon to be sure, but also give reasons why you believe it says what you think it says. And if you’re concerned your opinion may be leading your flock astray, print an honest warning in the church bulletin:

The claims you hear in Sunday’s sermon may be hazardous, if not to your prior theological commitments, then to your relationship to the preacher.

Previous Post

October 2, 2012

Art and Faithful Presence

Next Post

October 4, 2012 So Romney won Round One: But I Don't Care

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Alex Blondeau Authors Daniel Harrell Daniel Siedell Dawn Duncan Harrell Kyle Roberts Uncategorized Wyndy Corbin

Select a Month November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Though the fig tree does not bud and there are no grapes on the vines, yet I will rejoice in the Lord. What will God make my feet like?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Lions' paws Eagles' wings The feet of a deer A gazelle's legs