Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Cry 'Woof'

Home
Catholic
Review: Adobe Lightroom

Review: Adobe Lightroom

Last updated on: August 5, 2015 at 6:00 am by willduquette

Review: Adobe Lightroom 2015-08-01T13:21:00-05:00 willduquette

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I mentioned last week that I’m getting back into photography, and that I’d picked up a copy of Adobe Lightroom. And I have to say, Lightroom rocks.

Palm Trees Under Glass

Once upon a time it was the case that Photoshop was the tool of choice for professional finishing of digital photographs. It was simply what you used if you could afford the “Photoshop tax”, because it had all the tools you needed. You could crop images, fix (some) exposure issues, adjust the perspective, dodge and burn, change the degree of saturation, and many other things you could do in the analog process by your choice of camera, film, optical filters, and darkroom techniques.

But photographers were not the only users of Photoshop; the designers got a hold of it, and over time it became more an application for creating and modifying images in general, for using digital photos as part of a larger process and for creating images out of whole cloth, for fixing the defects of nature rather than holding up a mirror to it. I don’t mean to look down on designers here; but the point is that Photoshop has gotten increasing complex and powerful over the years. It’s still possible for a photographer to use it to finish photographs, but quite often it’s overkill: everything is possible, but the usual operations are more difficult than a photographer (especially a casual photographer) might like.

Enter Lightroom, which is aimed directly at the working photographer. It’s an all-in-one solution.

First, it imports my images from the camera to my preferred directory structure on the disk. I do not trust applications like iPhoto that want to pull my images into their own directory structures. I’ve used many different applications over the years to manage my images; I want a storage system that will outlast any given tool.

Second, if I shoot “raw” images (something I’m experimenting with) it does the raw conversion for me transparently.

Third, it helps me to catalog all of my photos, doing face detection and tracking other metadata painlessly.

Fourth, it helps me to find images and to browse my archive. It’s by far the most pleasant tool I’ve used to do this; its predecessor in my toolkit was Adobe Bridge 4, which Lightroom resembles in some ways, but Lightroom is speedier and easier and more streamlined, without sacrificing power or flexibility.

Fifth, and this has been the best discovery, it helps me to make the most out of my photos. With Adobe Bridge, you had to jump to Photoshop or Photoshop Elements to “develop” your pictures. Loading the image into the external editor was automatic but dreadfully slow; and then you had a Photoshop file to manage. With Lightroom you just go to the Develop tab, and start working.

The tools on the Develop tab are mostly oriented towards working with the entire image rather than pixel editing: e.g., exposure correction, color adjustment, perspective corrections, cropping, de-hazing, sharpening, noise reduction, and cropping. There are a few tools aimed at editing small portions, such as red-eye removal and spot healing, but that’s about it. And these are the tools I actually need. I purchased a Photography subscription to Adobe’s “Creative Cloud”, which gives me access to Lightroom and Photoshop; so far, I haven’t run into anything I wanted to do that requires Photoshop. I haven’t even started it up.

Better still is the way in which Lightroom modifies your image files, which (except for saving metadata) is not at all. Lightroom never touches your pixels. Instead, the changes you make are saved as a list of things to be done when you view the image; the original image is untouched. Then, when you export the image in some way (as an image file, or to the printer) Lightroom applies the set of changes in the optimal order, yielding a new image with minimal degradation. Further, you can create virtual copies of any image, and develop each in a different way.

All of this makes Lightroom extremely forgiving. I had always found image editing stressful; I was afraid of making mistakes and losing my original, or of doing a lot of work and then screwing it up. The upshot was that I rarely made the effort to pull the best out of an image because it was no fun.

With Lightroom, on the other hand, I’ve been having great fun. Highly recommended.

Incidentally, here’s the unmodified original shot that resulted in the image above. I’d never have attempted this sort of thing without Lightroom.

This is what the camera originally saw, straight out of the raw converter. The picture up above is what I saw on the side of the building and wanted to capture.

Previous Post

August 4, 2015

When Your Fist Strikes My Face, That's a Choice

Next Post

August 6, 2015 The Dogmat Saw Lions, Panthers, and Saints, Oh My!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Admin App o' the Morning Ask the Dogmat Believing Thomas Bits of Fiction Blasts from the Past Bootstrapping the Interior Life Catholic Mom Christian Living Deep Thoughts from the Doghouse Dominicana Evangelii Gaudium Interviews It Was A Dark and Stormy Night Links to This and That Lumen Fidei Meme Watch On Writing Operation Gratitude Pedant Errant Photography Quill Random Barkings S'Mary's World Shakers of Salt Software Development The Dog Whistler The Dogmat Sez Third Orders Thomas Aquinas Uncategorized Vikings at Dinos Woof Guide to Cinema Woof Guide to History Woof Guide to Literature Woof Guide to Obscure Catholic Music Woof Guide to Philosophy Woof Guide to Popular Music Woof Guide to Technology Woof Guide to Theology Words I Wish I'd Written Works For Me

Select a Month September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Why did God reject Saul as king?

Select your answer to see how you score.

He disobeyed God He was tricked by David He was too old He lost in battle