Today’s Aquinas: Why is the Word the Son of the Father?

Last updated on: June 28, 2015 at 11:51 am by willduquette

Today’s Aquinas: Why is the Word the Son of the Father? 2015-06-28T11:51:01-05:00 willduquette

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We’re blogging through St. Thomas Aquinas’ Compendium Theologiae, sometimes called his Shorter Summa. Find the previous posts here.

In this Chapter Thomas continues building up a model of the Trinity in Aristotelian terms. I must note that this is not the definitive model of the Trinity; as Augustine famously noted, the Trinity is a mystery that we cannot encompass. But it’s a way of thinking about the Trinity that Thomas found spiritually useful.

He continues from the previous chapter, in which he compared God’s Word to a concept in the intellect, using the human intellect as his model. But God’s knowing is only analogous to human knowing, not identical. There’s a similarity, but also a difference. First, he recapitulates and expands on what he says in the previous chapter:

But here a point of difference must be noted. What is conceived in the intellect is a likeness of the thing understood and represents its species; and so it seems to be a sort of offspring of the intellect. Therefore, when the intellect understands something other than itself, the thing understood is, so to speak, the father of the word conceived in the intellect, and the intellect itself resembles rather a mother, whose function is such that conception takes place in her.

When I understand an apple, the apple itself is in a sense the father of the idea “apple” in my mind. But here we are speaking of self-knowledge:

But when the intellect understands itself, the word conceived is related to the understanding person as offspring to father. Consequently, since we are using the term “Word” in the latter sense, that is, according as God understands Himself, the Word itself must be related to God, from whom the Word proceeds, as Son to Father.

God is not only the one understanding, but also the one understood. God Himself as the thing understood is the Father of the understand of God that is God’s word. Thus we have the first and second persons of the Trinity.

I expect some of my readers are concerned about this argument for the Fatherhood of God; but remember that we have left natural theology behind. Thomas is not attempting to prove the truths of the Faith from first principles; rather, he is trying to put the truths of the Faith into a logical order. We believe in God as Father because the Son, Jesus Christ, revealed God as “Our Father”. Thomas is simply showing one way in which we can understand God as the Father of His Word from all eternity while recognizing that there is no biological relationship involved.

____

photo credit: Public Domain; source Wikimedia Commons

Believing Thomas

compendium theologiae

Thomas Aquinas

Previous Post

June 26, 2015

The Wreck of the Athens Queen

Next Post

June 30, 2015 Why Not Worship Zeus?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Admin App o' the Morning Ask the Dogmat Believing Thomas Bits of Fiction Blasts from the Past Bootstrapping the Interior Life Catholic Mom Christian Living Deep Thoughts from the Doghouse Dominicana Evangelii Gaudium Interviews It Was A Dark and Stormy Night Links to This and That Lumen Fidei Meme Watch On Writing Operation Gratitude Pedant Errant Photography Quill Random Barkings S'Mary's World Shakers of Salt Software Development The Dog Whistler The Dogmat Sez Third Orders Thomas Aquinas Uncategorized Vikings at Dinos Woof Guide to Cinema Woof Guide to History Woof Guide to Literature Woof Guide to Obscure Catholic Music Woof Guide to Philosophy Woof Guide to Popular Music Woof Guide to Technology Woof Guide to Theology Words I Wish I'd Written Works For Me

Select a Month September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which king of Judah destroyed Nehushtan, the bronze serpent?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Manasseh Uzziah Hezekiah Josiah